Our Take on Pending Mergers and Acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions grind to a halt after a run of boom times.
Mergers and acquisitions grind to a halt after a run of boom times.
The excuses for the slowdown vary, but the evidence is striking. According to Thomson Financial Securities Data, worldwide M&A volume dropped 54% in the first half of the year. And other than a couple of major announcements--such as Hewlett-Packard acquiring Compaq --the trend seems to be continuing.
In some sectors, overcapacity and a spate of mergers that have yet to be digested have left some companies hesitant to bite off more than they can chew. In other cases, potential buyers say their weak stock prices are preventing them from acquiring other companies. Still others want to wait for better economic times before they go on a buying spree.
Nonetheless, of the deals now on the table and the ones that have been completed recently, only a few excite us. Here's a look at some buyers and sellers, along with others that have been forced to the sidelines.
General Motors (GM) wants to sell its Hughes Electronics division, which owns DirectTV. Two companies--EchoStar (DISH) and News Corp. --have shown an interest in buying it. Who stands to gain and who stands to lose? Flip channels among these three analyses-- GM, EchoStar, and News Corp.--to find out.
Cooper Industries wants to sell out and it has one offer on the table. But will a deal go through? Analyst Josh Peters handicaps the odds.
First Union has failed at acquisitions before. Click here to find out whether the company has learned from its mistakes or whether its recent merger with Wachovia will spell more trouble.
Since Hewlett-Packard announced a deal to acquire Compaq, investors have said the plans do not compute. Click on either company's analysis to find out why.
Cisco (CSCO) has been a major acquirer for years, but its deal count has dropped in 2001. Analyst Jay Ritter sorts out when growth will return to "normal" and what it means for investors.
Craig Woker does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.