Beware of European Bank Value Traps
Despite recent price falls, most European banks are not bargains.
With the European sovereign debt crisis dominating the headlines and many European banks trading near half of tangible book value, many value investors are drooling over the potential for bargain hunting. While many European banks' regulatory capital ratios look fine--most are near or above the new market-imposed 10% target--this disguises wide variation among firms, in our opinion. As we illustrate below, other measures show that many European banks are undercapitalized and have poor funding relative to U.S. banks. These banks may need to raise new capital not only in the near term as they prepare for write-downs on sovereign debt, but also in the long-term as investors become more conscious of the importance of investing in banks with sturdy capital bases. These capital raises are likely to be highly dilutive for current shareholders. We caution investors to beware of the value traps that may lie among Europe's many undercapitalized banks, and stick to the high ground of the best-capitalized, most liquid banks--namely, HSBC(HBC) (HSBA), Standard Chartered (STAN), and Julius Baer (BAER).
Hunting for Well-Capitalized Banks
With nearly all banks reporting adequate regulatory capital ratios, it can be difficult for general investors to distinguish between the best- and worst-capitalized banks. The chart below shows the core Tier 1 capital ratios of the major European banks, along with those of the top four U.S. banks. Core Tier 1 capital has largely replaced Tier 1 capital as the market's favorite gauge of banks' capital. Core Tier 1 capital measures the ratio of equity capital excluding preferred equity (and other types of debt-equity hybrids) to risk-weighted assets. As you can see, banks almost uniformly nearly meet or exceed the market-imposed 10% target and seem broadly comparable to U.S. banks. A couple, like Julius Baer and UBS (UBS) stand out as having capital well above the 10% level, but none stand out as having too little.
Erin Davis does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.