Skip to Content
Fund Spy

The High-Yield Dilemma

Is the extra income still worth it?

Mentioned: , , , , , , , , ,

High-yield corporate-bond mutual funds have surged in popularity so far in 2011. They took in $7.0 billion in new money during the first two months of the year alone, according to Morningstar estimates, which comes close to matching the category's $7.6 billion intake during all of 2010.

But are investors too late? Some could be chasing the impressive gains junk bonds have posted in recent years. High yield took a big hit during late 2008's financial crisis when frozen credit markets and rising defaults pushed yields on these bonds above 20% and prices below $60 (on par notional value), on average. But it rebounded with a vengeance beginning in March 2009; the Barclays Capital U.S. High Yield Index gained a record 58% that year. The sector's advance slowed somewhat in 2010, but the typical high-yield fund still managed to generate a 14% gain last year, almost matching the S&P 500's performance. Capital appreciation made up a significant component of the sector's performance in both of the past two years. The average dollar price of bonds in the Barclays index rose in 2009 to $95 from $61, and then to $102 by the end of 2010.

Those heady gains are over for now. With the index's average price above $103 currently, there's very little room for prices to rise further. Many of these bonds include call features, which limit how high dollar prices can go; issuers have an incentive to call their bonds when they're trading at a premium, because it means they can issue new debt more cheaply. The sector's potential income returns also appear muted: The Barclays index's 7% yield is near the low end of its historical range. The last time the index was priced above $103 was early 2005, when it also yielded a little less than 7%. That year, the typical high-yield bond fund returned just 2.6%.

Miriam Sjoblom does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.