Putting Mutual Fund Fees in Context
Our new data point gives investors a quick review on how their funds' fees stack up.
Our new data point gives investors a quick review on how their funds' fees stack up.
Costs matter in selecting funds. But viewing a fund's fees without context is a fruitless exercise. Is a 1.00% expense ratio high or low? As my tax professor once quipped, many of the best questions can be answered with, "It depends." With fund fees, it depends on the asset class and the level of services provided. For example, a 1.00% fee is competitive among foreign small-cap stock funds purchased with the assistance of a broker, but the same fee is questionable for an institutional large-cap offering.
Morningstar's new Fee Level scoring gives investors the context needed to compare a fund's share class-level fees. Research shows that a fund's fee level is one of the better predictors of future relative performance. With the Morningstar Fee Level, users quickly gain insight into a fund's relative level of fees compared with funds that have both a similar asset-class focus and distribution characteristics. The Morningstar Fee Level is a good first step evaluating fees after an investor has determined the asset class and distribution channel he wishes to use.
How It Works
This new tool doesn't dictate an arbitrary fee analysis across all funds and categories, but rather highlights the relative fee level within classes in five gradations.
In some cases, Morningstar categories have been combined into broader comparison groups of similar asset types. For example the large-value, large-blend, and large-growth categories are combined in a large-cap comparison group, as the market profile and liquidity of these segments are relatively similar. It isn't more or less costly to invest in one area of the large-cap market.
Within those comparison groups, fund share classes are divided into five distribution classes based on their investment minimums, load structures, and distribution fee profiles. The five classes are no load, front load, deferred load, level load, and institutional. As a result, example comparison groups would be:
Within each distribution class, a fund's annual report net expense ratio (prospectus net expense ratio is used for target-date funds to capture underlying fund fees) is ranked against its peers using five quintiles. Each quintile corresponds to one of the following scores:
The methodology originated in Morningstar's Stewardship Grade for funds. We have leveraged the fee analysis done there across virtually all mutual fund share classes.
How to Use It
The comparison groups (detailed below) provide a strong starting point for investors building portfolios and are especially helpful for asset-allocation decisions. The fee level also provides added insight because share classes are judged on a like-distribution or "apples to apples" basis.
Morningstar refines its categories and methodologies based on changing industry dynamics to provide the most relevant analysis to help investors. Adding much-needed context to the study of fees will help investors make better decisions. Click here to see the methodology of the Fee Level calculation.
Comparison Groups
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.