Our Outlook for Consumer Cyclical Stocks
While the U.S. economy still faces headwinds, we're projecting growth in 2011.
While the U.S. economy still faces headwinds, we're projecting growth in 2011.
<< Return to Main Market Outlook Page
While pockets of softness still exist, our expectation for a modest recovery among consumer cyclical firms in 2011 remains intact, with mid-single-digit top-line growth projected for much of the sector. Retail sales remain particularly strong as the sector recently posted its fifth consecutive month of sequential growth in excess of 6% on an annualized basis. A strong December would bring the string of improvements to six months.
Clarity on the Bush tax cuts and unemployment benefits, sharply improving markets, and new stimulus money (in the form of a 2% cut in payroll tax) should give consumers even more cash to spend in the months ahead. All in, the government appears determined to bring the consumer back to help lead the U.S. economic recovery. To date, we've frankly been a bit surprised by the strength, but the recent trends and data give us increased confidence that sales momentum can continue into the first half of 2011.
Within the consumer cyclical sector are a diverse group of industry categories, including advertising and marketing services, entertainment, publishing, restaurants, specialty and apparel retail, and travel and leisure. While each is unique, we've presented the prevalent themes for each industry during a period of gradual economic recovery:
Advertising and Marketing Services
Entertainment
Substitutes to the traditional pay television model--such as offerings from Apple (AAPL), Hulu, Netflix (NFLX), Roku, and others--have generated a substantial amount of buzz, but pay television remains a dominant industry. Roughly 90% of television households receive service from a cable, satellite, or phone company, according to Nielsen.
Considering the tough economic times and high unemployment rate in the United States, pay TV subscriptions have been exceptionally resilient. Compared to other cyclical categories, total pay television subscriber growth modestly increased in 2009 (partially a result of the digital broadcast transition that made it more difficult to get over-the-air programming and the aggressive price promotion among distributors) and has remained essentially flat in 2010. We would not be surprised to see some modest subscriber losses over the next few quarters due to cyclical issues such as tepid household formation numbers, but we don't anticipate any precipitous subscriber declines given the lack of comparable substitutes.
We expect demand for television content to continue in 2011 with more viewing occurring on mobile devices and tablet computers like the iPad. In order to satisfy consumer demand, we believe content owners and distributors will come together to allow subscribers to access content on multiple devices with an authentication system. We think both sides of the lucrative pay TV ecosystem recognize the importance of making content available across multiple platforms. Time Warner was one of the early proponents of this concept, which it named "TV Everywhere," and its premium HBO Go service allows subscribers to access content through its proprietary website. HBO customers will be able to stream programming on portable devices by early 2011. Included within the recently extended carriage agreement between Disney (DIS) and Time Warner Cable was access to a new authenticated service, which now allows cable subscribers to access ESPN and will soon offer ESPN2, ESPNU, and ESPN Goal Line on multiple devices.
We view the "TV Everywhere" model as limiting the threats of cord-cutting and piracy in the long run. While this concept is still in the early stages, we expect cable networks to offer digital access as a negotiating tool to continue to push for higher affiliate fees when negotiating with its cable, satellite, and telecom partners, driving revenue growth rates upward
Publishing
Following a rough 2008 and 2009, advertising trends at magazine and newspaper publishing industries improved during 2010 and will likely continue in 2011 due to an overall recovery in advertising budgets. However, we don't expect the rebound in advertising to benefit all advertising-dependent companies equally, as the secular shift in media consumption from print to online benefits companies like Google at the expense of newspaper and magazine publishers. Therefore we're expecting gradual advertising declines for the magazines and newspapers beyond 2011.
Several large magazine publishers have formed a consortium called Next Issue Media to jointly work on an electronic delivery business model for e-readers like the Kindle and iPad. The publishers want to make it easy for consumers to browse and buy content on the device of their choice, and plan to work with Amazon (AMZN), Apple, and other device manufacturers. However, we believe a significant challenge for the consortium will be retaining control of the customer relationship, as Amazon and Apple both have closed systems that control distribution. We think electronic reading devices, particularly Apple's iPad, could help increase readership of publications; however, the ad revenue model for digital content is unclear
Restaurants
The domestic restaurant industry has been impacted by a number of headwinds over the past several years, including fewer meals eaten away from home, increased prepackaged meal offerings from grocers and warehouse clubs, elevated unemployment rates, and wage rate hikes. However, we started to see a reversal in several of these trends in 2010, with fast-casual chains--which offer higher-quality ingredients than quick-service chains but at lower average prices than casual-dining restaurants--leading the pack. Collectively, we forecast mid-single-digit top-line growth for the restaurant industry in 2011, driven primarily by improving restaurant traffic (but still well below historic norms). We also anticipate some impact from menu price inflation, as restaurant operators have already started to raise prices in light of rising commodity costs.
Specialty and Apparel Retail
Most retailers saw merchandise margins improve during 2010 as sales rebounded and firms kept expenses in check. There were still signs of aggressive markdowns in some cases, owing to a cautious and value-focused consumer, but with inventory levels near cyclical lows, the full-priced sell-through was much improved. Retailers were also cautious in expanding their selling, general, and administrative expense budgets in 2010, and only added headcount, advertising and marketing spend as they gained visibility on consumer spending trends. A few highlights:
Travel and Leisure
The travel and leisure industry remains in recovery mode after a multiyear slump. We are optimistic that trends will slowly continue to improve for the travel industry in 2011. Although many indicators have improved markedly since their lows, we still think there is room for further improvement before reaching more normalized levels. Vehicle miles driven and global air passenger enplanements have both improved, foretelling positive trends in other travel spending such as cruise vacations, rental car bookings, hotel bookings, or leisure activities. However, we do not expect sentiment or travel volumes to return to 2007 levels anytime soon. Most of the gains to be had from increased consumer willingness to spend were achieved in the recent past; gains from consumers' ability to spend are much more slow to arrive and will only be reached as the employment situation improves.
Dealing with Commodity Headwinds
As consumer cyclical firms take a moment to reflect upon 2010, many will agree that it has been a trying yet ultimately successful year. Despite an uneven consumer appetite, most companies will have reported a solid rebound in sales, low inventories, and record margins. As we detailed above, there are a number of reasons for continued near-term optimism as it relates to the first half of 2011, and we recognize further signs of an improving economy. At the same time, while we have become less concerned about sustainability of the top line, our attention has turned to commodity costs, which may have more of a mixed impact on firms' margins next year.
Many retailers already warned against rising input costs in the first half of 2011, specifically citing transportation, labor, and cotton as the primary culprits. Companies like Polo Ralph Lauren , VF Corporation, Carter's (CRI), and Phillips-Van Heusen (PVH) have gone out of their way on conference calls, in filings, and at investor events to highlight these pressures and set expectations. Management's statements are a clear indication that firms across the retail supply chain are being impacted by the higher input costs, and even the largest and most financially sound manufacturers will be forced to raise prices over the course of calendar 2011.
Kohl's (KSS) and J.C. Penney are managing vendors, assortments, and product makers for cost increases. First-half 2011 orders are already booked with only modest cost increases, but there is increased uncertainty surrounding the back half of the year. Retailers are delaying orders, and vendors are weighing whether to lock in materials; there is work to be done to avoid dramatic price increases, particularly for cotton-based merchandise.
For example, cotton prices increased by 30%-50% from the $0.80-$0.90 per pound range earlier this year as demand from apparel manufacturers picked up, outpacing supply. The supply/demand imbalance was further exacerbated by bad weather in the world's largest cotton producers, including China, India, and Pakistan (which account for 30%, 20% and 8% of global production, respectively) in recent months, pushing cotton prices up to $1.55 per pound in November 2010. Since the lead time for apparel manufacturing is typically about six to nine months, apparel retailers will start to see the impact of higher cotton prices hit home in spring 2011, with further sourcing cost pressures projected for the fall season. However, consistent with prior cycles, we project that cotton prices will eventually moderate as more supplies come online, and prices have started to retreat from the peak. Cotton prices have averaged $0.70 per pound over the longer term; we think the downward trend will continue over the back half of 2011.
Restaurants are another industry category that will face inflationary cost pressures in 2011. Despite our outlook for solid top-line growth, we believe restaurant operating income growth may be more muted in 2011 than it was 2010, as restaurant operators contend with higher food prices across several beef, wheat, dairy, and coffee inputs. Additionally, we believe restaurant chains will need to invest more on labor and other in-store improvements in 2011 to satisfy heightened consumer demand.
As we consider such headwinds, we think that the larger and more established consumer cyclical firms have more of an opportunity to offset these higher commodity costs: 1) Selective price increases are "inevitable," according to several management teams. 2) Although promotions may continue, most retailers appear to be holding clean inventory positions, suggesting that markdown activity in 2011 should be less than this year. Discounting will also remain a key theme in restaurants, but we believe competition will be more rational than it was in 2010. 3) Companies will place additional advertising and marketing behind their faster-growing (and most profitable) products/brands in an attempt to take incremental share. 4) Product mix will undoubtedly change. In apparel, shifts toward wool, polyester, sportswear other non-denim (high cotton content) products will be made in an attempt to preserve overall margins. We also expect restaurant menus to continue their shift toward beverages and portable snack items to drive operating income higher. 5) Consolidated top-line growth may become even more dependent on international markets. Some domestic brands are becoming well-known in the local Chinese marketplace, which should drive incremental gross profit dollars to firms in 2011.
With Plenty of Cash on the Sidelines, M&A Could Continue
On Nov. 23, J. Crew became the latest to join the M&A fray after the company announced that it would be acquired by private equity firms TPG Capital and Leonard Green & Partners. This marks the second LBO deal in the specialty retail space in the fourth quarter alone (following Bain Capital's acquisition of Gymboree). Under the agreement, J. Crew shareholders will receive $2.8 billion, or $43.50 per share, a 16% premium to the stock's closing price from Nov. 20, before takeover reports surfaced. On the flipside, some firms are taking steps of their own: Radio Shack , Barnes & Noble , and BJ's Wholesale had at one point or another this year reviewed strategic alternatives, while Aeropostale was reported to have hired Barclays Capital as its strategic advisor to help fend off potential offers by private equity firms.
There is still a large amount of uncommitted capital available for takeovers (more than $400 billion, according to market research firm Preqin), with U.S.-focused buyout firms sitting on more than half of the available funds. Therefore, we expect a continued appetite for similar leveraged buyouts in the consumer industry over the next several months. While private-equity deals in the retail sector have been a mixed bag historically, given the cyclical nature of the industry, these companies exhibit strong free cash flow generation with minimal debt on the balance sheet, which fits the typical LBO profile.
Morningstar has developed a proprietary scoring system, which assesses each firm's feasibility of takeover based on company size, current capital structure, free cash flow generation, and management's ability and/or barriers in pursuing a possible transaction. Based on the rankings, we think lululemon athletica, Carter's , Wendy's/Arby's Group (WEN), and Sonic could potentially be the next takeout targets. Additionally, several names that have been the subject of recent takeover rumors, such as Aeropostale, Chico's , American Eagle, and Brinker International (EAT), also scored high on our list.
Consumer Cyclical Stocks for Your Radar
Consumer Cyclical Stocks for Your Radar | |||||
Star Rating | Fair Value Estimate | Economic Moat | Fair Value Uncertainty | Price/ Fair Value | |
International Speedway | $38.00 | Wide | Medium | 0.67 | |
Lowe's | $36.00 | Wide | Medium | 0.71 | |
Sonic Corporation | $13.00 | None | Medium | 0.82 | |
Staples | $27.00 | None | Medium | 0.83 | |
Opentable | $25.00 | Narrow | Very High | 2.77 | |
Data as of 12-20-10. |
International Speedway
Demand for motorsports entertainment has been largely impacted by high unemployment, but we expect International Speedway will see a steady influx of fans returning to the sport as more job-seekers find work in the coming years. Much of this growth will fall directly to free cash flow because a large portion of the firm's costs are fixed, regardless of revenue. The firm is currently trading at 23 times trailing earnings, but only 10 times our estimate for 2012 earnings. Our fair enterprise value is 8 times 2010 EBITDA.
Lowe's (LOW)
Despite a shaky macro environment, Lowe's has remained profitable and continues to generate significant cash from operations. The market's pessimism reflects persistent fears surrounding housing and consumer spending uncertainty. The removal of homebuying stimulus and higher interest rates could remain downside risks in the short term; however, we expect shares to recover as U.S. economic growth normalizes and macro concerns subside.
Sonic
Near-term restaurant traffic and margins will likely be plagued by high unemployment and aggressive industry discounting, but we're optimistic about Sonic's long-term prospects. We find the firm's domestic growth opportunities, profitable menu mix, ascending royalty rate structure, and lower capital requirements particularly compelling. Same-store sales trends should start to improve against easier comparisons.
Staples
High unemployment and small-business budget constraints have weighed on results, but we believe the market is underestimating this company's ability to deliver a strong performance as the economy improves. Staples is the dominant retailer of office products, and continues to see an uptick in customer traffic while rivals have seen declines. Corporate Express continues to have a positive impact on international and North American delivery segment profits, and we remain optimistic about the long-term synergies.
Opentable
An exceptional business model and strong growth potential are not enough to justify an excessively lofty valuation for this firm. Even under our most optimistic forecasts, the stock appears expensive and is currently trading at more than 60 times our forward fiscal-year earnings estimate.
If you'd like to track and analyze the stocks mentioned above, click here to create a watch list. Then simply click "continue," name your watch list, and click "done." (If this link does not work, please register with Morningstar.com--registration is free--or sign in if you're already a member, and try again.) This will allow you to save and monitor these holdings within our Portfolio Manager.
Other Outlook Articles
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.