An Aggressive ETF Portfolio for Retirees
See what we recommend for risk-averse ETF investors with 20-plus-year time horizons.
A few decades ago, retirees could reasonably hunker down in certificates of deposit and other safe investments and generate a livable income. But that formula has been turned on its head for today's retirees. With cash and bond yields as low as they are, as well as the fact that many retirees could be drawing on their portfolios for a few decades or more, sticking with the safe stuff just isn't going to cut it unless you have a very high level of wealth.
Therefore, it's probably not too surprising that several readers sounded a similar critique about my recent conservative and moderate exchange-traded fund portfolios: They argued that the portfolios are not aggressive enough. For retired or soon-to-be-retired investors with a bigger appetite for capital appreciation--and who can also stomach the higher volatility and the potential for outright losses that come along with a higher dose of stocks--this aggressive model ETF portfolio is for you. It holds half of its assets in stocks and the rest in bonds and cash. It's appropriate for retirees and pre-retirees with time horizons (estimated life expectancy) of 20 or more years. Thus, capital appreciation is an equally important goal as is stability.
But first--why ETFs for retirees? For starters, ETFs usually have low costs and good tax efficiency, and now many brokerage firms are allowing commission-free trades to boot. There's also that small fact that the typical active fund hasn't outperformed its benchmark over time. But perhaps the key benefit of ETFs or index funds in retiree portfolios is the ability to set it and forget it. Using exchange-traded funds gives an you a high degree of control over asset allocation. As a result, it's easy to shift into more conservative investments over time, and you don't have to worry about factors such as manager changes.
In-Retirement Portfolio: AggressiveHolding Allocation %Vanguard Mega Cap 300 Index MGC 27Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO) 9Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB) 3iShares MSCI EAFE Index (EFA) 9Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock ETF (VWO) 2iShares Barclays TIPS Bond (TIP) 17Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) 9SPDR DB Int'l Gov't Infl-Protected Bond (WIP) 2iShares Barclays MBS Bond (MBB) 6iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corp Bond (LQD) 12Cash 4Total 100
As with the other two portfolios, I've relied on Morningstar's Lifetime Allocation Indexes, which in turn rely on the research of Ibbotson Associates, a division of Morningstar, to flesh out the asset allocations. It's helpful to think of these allocations as a starting point: Users should feel free to tweak them based on their own situations, risk tolerances, and time horizons.
As with the previous two portfolios, I've leaned heavily on the insights of Morningstar's ETF analysts for their best ideas for populating an ETF portfolio. That team produces Morningstar's ETFInvestor newsletter, which also includes two model portfolios--the Hands-Free Portfolio, a long-term strategic portfolio, and the Hands-On Portfolio, featuring a more tactical-allocation approach. Note that these portfolios include holdings from multiple providers such as Vanguard and iShares, but it's possible to get fairly close to these portfolios' asset allocations using ETFs from Vanguard or iShares only.
A Total-Return Approach
This aggressive ETF portfolio stakes roughly half of its assets in stocks and holds the rest in a combination of cash, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, and other bonds. Truly aggressive retirees and pre-retirees--such as those whose living expenses are fully covered with income from Social Security, a pension, or a business--might consider tipping even more into equities. While it contains a hefty stake in bonds, it's not designed solely or even primarily for current income. Rather, the goal is to deliver a combination of capital appreciation with a reasonable amount of stability and income. As with the other portfolios, the assumption is that investors will use a total-return approach and periodically shift some of their investment assets to cash to fund current living expenses. (For a discussion of income versus total return and the merits of each, read this helpful thread.)
As with the previous two portfolios, this portfolio doesn't take the total bond market route in an effort to avoid a giant weighting in government bonds. Instead, it includes separate holdings dedicated to corporates ( iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond (LQD)) and mortgage-backed bonds (iShares Barclays MBS Bond (MBB)). Together, these two funds replicate the securities in a total market bond index fund, except they exclude the government-bond exposure. (Those seeking a more streamlined, hands-off portfolio that's agnostic about the current market environment could also use a total bond market index fund like Vanguard Total Bond Market (BND).) However, it's worth noting that the portfolio doesn't eschew government bonds altogether. It includes a 26% stake in iShares Barclays TIPS Bond (TIP) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV). For additional inflation protection, it also includes a smaller position in SPDR DB International Government Inflation-Protected Bond (WIP), giving it exposure to inflation-protected bonds issued by foreign governments. Inflation-conscious investors might also consider a small slice of commodities or even precious metals exposure, but they should bear in mind that these investments have some limitations, as I discussed in this article.
On the U.S. equity side, I've again modeled the holdings on ETFInvestor's Hands-Free Portfolio and have included three distinct funds. One could obtain similar market exposure via a broad market index portfolio such as Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI), but our portfolio has a modest emphasis on mega-caps, which look relatively attractive to our equity analyst team right now.
The Role of Cash
As with last week's portfolio, this one does include cash, but it's not here to fulfill investors' income needs; rather, it's here to improve the portfolio's overall risk/return characteristics. The amount of cash you hold will be highly dependent on your personal situation: your spending needs, whether you're receiving income from other sources, and the size of your overall portfolio. The traditional rule of thumb is for retirees to keep two to five years' worth of living expenses in cash.
|New! 30-Minute Money Solutions|
|Need help picking up the pieces in this turbulent market? 30-Minute Money Solutions by Morningstar Director of Personal Finance Christine Benz simplifies the daunting task of getting your financial house in order. Written for novice and experienced investors alike, this book offers manageable, step-by-step solutions for tackling money challenges and building a comprehensive financial plan in simple 30-minute increments. Learn more.|
|Reserve Your Copy Today--$16.95|
Publishes January 2010
Christine Benz does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.