Hussman on the Risk/Reward Trade-Off for 30-Year Treasuries
John Hussman looks at the interest-rate risks inherent in buying long-term government debt.
John Hussman looks at the interest-rate risks inherent in buying long-term government debt.
Ryan Leggio: Jeff Gundlach, the president of DoubleLine Funds and the manager of DoubleLine Total Return, he is the former manager of TCW Total Return, gave a keynote address at the Morningstar Investment Conference last week in which he recommended investors' purchase a long term treasuries. Specifically, because of the deflationary concerns out there, because of the relatively steep yield curve, and his recommendation was, long-term treasuries are the place to be, but if investor confidence in the United States government wanes to get out very, very quickly.
And the reason why he had to qualify his remarks and say to get out quickly was because of the math of long-term treasuries. As you and I both noted, the long term 30-year Treasury is about 4% annualized right now. The problem with that is the duration of 30-year Treasury Bond is, approximately 15 years.
John Hussman: It's actually closer to – the benchmark is closer to 17 right now.
Leggio: So 17.
Hussman: As the yields come down and – durations blow out when yields come down exactly.
Leggio: So 17 years, so if investors really time that poorly, they are in a world of hurt, because that capital loss will more than overcome the income return. Do you have any specific comments about that investment strategy, especially since both you and Jeff Gundlach both think there are deflationary issues over the next few years for the U.S. economy?
Hussman: I do think that there are those issues, the question becomes, how much risk do you want to take for a given amount of expected return? As we just went over, if you are looking at 15 to 17-year duration on a 30-year bond really what that means is that if interest rates move by a 100 basis points, the bond price moves by about 17%, up or down. So you're really looking at a lot of sensitivity.
We actually saw a similar situation back in the beginning, actually at the end of '08, where we got 10-year yields down to just about 2%, it was fascinating and the 30-year bond was really down to low yield as well. And my concern was that very quickly 30-year bonds could give up 25%, 30% of value, and in fact they did, because we got down to such a low yield that any yield movement at all had to be on the downside or investors would be hurt.
And so my suggestion here is for investors to actually be very tolerant, very aware of the amount of risk that they can tolerate, because it's not at all clear to me that we're going to see any let up in the amount of debt that the Treasury has to issue if not for bailouts, which I hope they don't, at least for unemployment compensation most likely for stimulus plans, which again, I have mixed feelings about, and so forth. But normally after credit crisis as Reinhart and Rogoff note in their book, This Time it's Different. Domestic debt tends to go up by about 86% over the three years following credit crisis. So we are going to see a lot more Treasury issuance probably.
And I am hesitant about the idea, we'll speculate on something that's very risky until you shouldn't, and as soon as you shouldn't get out. Because my experience has been that investors don't get the chance to all get out at the same time. And for our part we prefer to panic before everybody else does, that's one of the things we've constantly said. We tend to be early, but we prefer to panic before everyone else does and that served us well. I think the same is true of investing in 30 years.
You really have to know your risk tolerance otherwise for our parts I think 10-year Treasury securities are fine as a portion of a portfolio with the understanding, as you mentioned Ryan, that if interest rates turned, those things lose in proportion to their duration. So you don't want to have a lot of duration risk as we move further through any economic downturn or crisis. You would tend to want to move to shorter maturities even though those maturities invariably will be providing you next to no yield, because it's just safer and it's better to have your money in something safe that doesn't have a lot of capital loss than to have something in something risky where you could actually lose a lot if interest rates turn.
Leggio: So John, it really sounds like bond investors and stock investors really need to be not only resilient, but really need to keep an eye on market conditions over the next few years.
Hussman: Sure.
Leggio: John, thanks so much for joining us today.
Hussman: It's a great pleasure as usual.
Leggio: Thank you for joining us. This is Ryan Leggio for Morningstar.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.