Pay Attention to the Men behind the Curtain at Vanguard
Family lifts the veil on its Managed Payout Funds' investment committee.
Family lifts the veil on its Managed Payout Funds' investment committee.
Vanguard has revealed the men behind the curtain of its Managed Payout Funds.
Since it launched its three endowmentlike funds in 2008, the fund family has kept to itself the names of the members of the investment committee that sets and tweaks the asset allocations for the portfolios. That opacity is one of the reasons why it has been hard to recommend these offerings, which are designed to use sophisticated, institutional-grade portfolio-management strategies to make investors' nest eggs last forever, while supporting monthly payments of 3% to 7% of the funds' three-year trailing average net asset values. Think David Swensen's Yale Model for the masses.
The other reasons have included the uninspiring showing of the funds, which are Vanguard's first attempt at endowment-style investing for retail investors. Vanguard Managed Payout Growth Focus , Vanguard Managed Payout Growth & Distribution , and Vanguard Managed Payout Distribution Focus have lost between 5% and 8% annualized from their May 2008 inception through early March 2010, more than most other payout funds that have been launched in recent years, such as Fidelity's Income Replacement funds and Schwab's Monthly Income funds. From June 2008 to June 2009, Vanguard's Managed Payout Funds also shed more than the typical college and university endowment, which dropped 18.7%, according to a survey of 842 institutions by the National Association of College and University Business Officers and educational institution investment firm Commonfund. The funds fell between 21% and 27% in that time.
The Vanguard Managed Payout Funds' poor performance since inception has forced the funds to reduce the dollar amount of their payments in each of the past two years. They've also had to return capital to fundowners because there haven't been enough capital gains and income to cover distributions. Adding to the uncertainty is the fact that the family is toying with the idea of adding an internally managed hedge fund to the Managed Payout Funds' arsenal. And Vanguard's experience, so far, with alternative investment approaches like these funds and the Vanguard Market Neutral (VMNFX) hasn't exactly impressed.
At least the family has made the Managed Payout Funds' management more transparent. Vanguard has long said its CIO and indexing and quantitative investing expert Gus Sauter would lead the investment committee setting the funds' course, and Vanguard 500 (VFINX) manager Michael Buek would implement the panel's recommendations. Until now Vanguard left it at that and kept the rest of the committee a secret. Soon, however, the firm will disclose in its prospectuses that its chief economist Joseph Davis, investment counseling and research group chief John Ameriks, and portfolio review department head Chris McIsaac make up the balance of the committee.
It's curious that some of Vanguard's other talent, such as fixed-income group head Robert Auwaerter or the family's head of active quant investing, Joel Dickson, aren't on the committee. But the roster raises no red flags. Unlike Sauter, none of the other committee members have public fund management records. They've all been with Vanguard for years, though, and have experience thinking about portfolios. Davis and Ameriks have Ph.D.s and have led the firm's research, respectively, into economic forecasting and retirement planning and investing, as well as investor behavior. McIsaac oversees Vanguard's group of analysts that selects and monitors the subadvisors of many of Vanguard's actively managed funds.
Unveiling the composition of the Managed Payout Funds' brain trust clears some of the fog around these funds' future, but not all of it. They still have to prove they can meet their objectives over the long term.
Vanguard Fund Family Report | ||||
Our new eight-page report gives you independent Morningstar opinion and information on these fund families each month. | It includes news, in-depth analysis on what it means for you, the best and worst funds in a family, and much more. Learn more. | |||
$115.00 for 12 issues | ||||
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.