Don't Throw in the Towel on Recovery Just Yet
The fall in the ISM index this month doesn't necessarily mean the recovery is stalled.
The fall in the ISM index this month doesn't necessarily mean the recovery is stalled.
Every month the ISM (Institute of Supply Management) releases its survey of purchasing managers in the manufacturing sector. Today's PMI number was below expectations, clocking in at 52.6 versus 52.9 the prior month and expectations of something closer to 54. This miss is at least partially responsible for the market hitting the panic button today.
Still, given that the market has come up so fast and so far (almost 60% in just over six months) some retrenchment was probably in the cards, with or without the PMI number. In fact, things really aren't so dire, a number over 50 indicates that more people believe things are getting better than getting worse. A number sustained in this range typically correlates with GDP growth of over 3%.
The PMI is a wonderful and very reliable early indicator of the end of a recession. As I have mentioned many times, this indicator tends to bottom four or five months prior to the recession, which is exactly what happened this time, as I believe the end of the recession will be pegged in either May or June based on the big coincident indicators (retail sales, employment, industrial production, and incomes). This would be about five months after the index bottomed at 32.9 in December.
So after a move from 32.9 to 52.9 over eight months, a one-month setback of 0.3 doesn't seem to be a reason to throw in the towel on an economic recovery just yet. Also, as I have warned in past pieces, the PMI is not as good an indicator on the way down. For example, between the 1990 and 2001 recessions, the indicator moved down sharply and back up three times over those 11 years before correctly predicting another recession on its fourth dip.
The temporary setback in the PMI number today is very typical of the past 10 recessions. On average the PMI index experiences a reversal in its upward trend about four or five months after the end of the recession. In eight out of 10 recessions, that trend resumed its upward movement in just one month, and in three months during the other two recessions. So we won't have to wait long to see if the number is a fluke or the start of a double dip.
Recession Start YearMonths to PMI ReversalMonths of Adverse Trend19481119532119588119614119704119748119808319824119907320005120074?Average5.11.4I'd also note that most, but not all, recessions are proceeded by at least one reading that is below 50. Now if the trend is down for two more months and one of those readings is below 50, I will need to rethink my optimism.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.