Skip to Content
Stock Strategist

All-Star Managers Report on the Rally

Our stock analysts' favorite managers remain true to their game.

Mentioned: , , , , , , , , ,

Each quarter, Morningstar stock analysts review the shareholder letters and holdings of a select group of fund managers in an attempt to learn more about their stock-selection process. The past two years have been enlightening, to say the least, as we followed the managers from the beginning of the recession (and some well-publicized missteps) to the market depths reached in March and now on to stabilization and possibly the beginnings of recovery.

Managers Warn against Market-Timing
After the massive stock market rally that took place in the second quarter, some of the managers on our roster of favorites are probably justified in defending their decision to stay invested in the face of the deteriorating macroeconomic picture in 2007 and 2008, and despite the losses incurred in the interim.  Third Avenue Value's (TAVFX) Marty Whitman explained the reasoning behind his decision to remain invested, writing that "Fund Management cannot make sound investment decisions if it assumes that draconian general market declines are just around the corner," and casting a skeptical eye toward claims that such a thing can be done. According to him, "the sole reason why TAVF Management does not pay any attention to general market factors, is that we are no good at making such prognostications. We don't think anybody else--perhaps with the exception of a few geniuses who are unknown to us--is any good at it either."  Weitz Partners Value's (WPVLX) Wally Weitz agreed that market-timing is nearly always an exercise in futility, observing that "taking the extreme position of going to 100% cash in the fall of 2007, or even in the summer of 2008, would have saved us considerable grief. Unfortunately, though, if we had tried to get out of stocks every time we sensed stock market 'danger' over the past 39 years, we probably would have produced much lower returns and higher tax bills." Weitz also invokes Warren Buffett's statement that he "would not have been pleased if [his potential successor] had moved to cash" during this period. Fund managers also made their case for security analysis, or as Mario Gabelli of  Gabelli Asset (GABAX) called it, "Plain Old Stock Picking." According to the management team at  Mutual Shares (TESIX), "macroeconomic developments do matter, but not to the exclusion of company specifics, as seemed to be the case for much of 2008 and the first part of the year."

Jim Sinegal has a position in the following securities mentioned above: BRK.B, AIG. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.