Skip to Content
Fund Spy

One of the Best Fund Companies You've Never Heard Of

A hidden gem from upstate New York.

Thanks to the bear market, many fund sponsors are on the auction block. That, alas, is not necessarily good news for shareholders of the affected funds. Deals involving money-management firms often lead to mergers and manager shakeups. That is one reason I like funds offered by employee-owned asset managers: Such companies rarely put themselves up for sale.

One modest, employee-owned asset manager you've probably never heard of is Manning & Napier. Although the firm, based in Fairport, N.Y., runs $16 billion in total, it's a blip in the fund world, with $5.2 billion spread among 17 funds. But in recent years Morningstar has warmed to the M&N funds, even if few others have.

Collegial Approach
The big draws at Manning & Napier are consistency and discipline. A nine-member team, supported by 43 analysts and 11 economists, manages all of the funds. The managers and analysts search for strong companies trading at reasonable valuations--usually at least 25% below what they think the companies are worth. Thousands of funds have a similar approach to stock-picking, but they lack M&N's strong emphasis on downside protection and successful results.

Manning & Napier's model attracts good stock-pickers and gets them to work as a team. To get a stock included in a portfolio, an analyst must first persuade a senior partner that it's a winner. The partner then does his or her own research to confirm or refute the analyst's work. In determining bonuses, analysts get 80% of the credit (or blame) for a stock pick, and the partner gets 20%. The compensation clock starts ticking when the stock goes into the portfolio, and it doesn't stop until the stock is sold. So if a stock does well one year, but those gains are wiped out--or worse--the following year, the analyst's bonus takes a hit. That is a great way to align the interests of the professionals with those of fund shareholders.

M&N has built a line of relatively low-cost stock funds and balanced funds that have delivered strong risk-adjusted results. Here are my favorites.

 Manning & Napier Equity (EXEYX) is a large-company growth fund that has managed to perform relatively well this year as well as last. That may not sound like much, but this year's rebound has been led by last year's hardest-hit sectors and names, so it's no mean feat. From its inception through June 30, 2009, it gained 6.2% annualized versus a loss of 3.9% for the S&P 500.

I also like (and own)  Manning & Napier World Opportunities , an overseas stock fund that, from its inception in September 1996 through June 30, 2009, outpaced the MSCI EAFE Index by an average of 900 basis points per year. Its 10-year returns through August are 8.72% versus 5.99%. It uses the same strategy, but its overseas picks have emphasized European health and consumer names, with a dash of Latin American consumer stocks.

If you really want to dial down risk, there's  Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Conservative Term (EXDAX), which holds 64% of its assets in bonds, 11% in cash, and the rest in stocks. In 2008, the fund lost just 5%. Of course, its upside is rather limited, too. It has gained just 9% so far this year. From its inception through June, the fund returned an annualized 6% versus a return of 0.7% for the Morningstar Moderate Target Risk Index.

One move that helped last year's performance across nearly the entire M&N lineup was a decision in 2006 to start trimming the funds' weightings in financial stocks. Managers had become concerned about the overheated real estate market and a lack of transparency among financial firms.

In today's fast-moving world, Manning & Napier remains an oasis of stability. The firm isn't selling itself, hasn't laid off professionals, and hasn't been overwhelmed with a flood of new cash. All of this suggests that Manning & Napier funds stand a better chance than most of maintaining their good records. Because of the firm's risk-averse style, I suspect that M&N's results won't be as impressive during blistering market rallies. But that's an acceptable price to pay for dependable, gimmick-free funds.

This article originally appeared in Kiplinger's.

Poll Results
In my last Fund Spy poll, I asked: "Which fund most deserves to be dumped?" Here's how you voted:

23% - Firsthand Technology Value
21% - Van Kampen Government Securities
28% - Direxion Small Cap Bull 2.5X
28% - Leader Short Term Bond

 

 

FundInvestor Newsletter
Morningstar FundInvestor is
a 48-page newsletter dedicated to helping investors pick great mutual funds, build winning portfolios, and monitor their funds for greater
gains. This one-year subscription consists of 12 monthly issues, a Reader's Guide, and four free investing reports.
Learn more.
 $129.00 for 12 Print Issues $119.00 for 12 PDF Issues
   

Sponsor Center