Why the Chrysler Reorganization Is Bad for Capitalism
By ignoring bankruptcy law, the president's auto task force has made other U.S. companies worth less.
When financial historians look back on the spring of 2009, don't be surprised if this time period stands out as a not-so-bright one in the annals of U.S. capitalism. This is not just because the country, and the world for that matter, is dealing with an extremely severe pullback in economic output. Downturns happen in the normal course of economic growth and occur from time to time as the free market cleans out excesses created in each prior cycle. More distressing is the manner in which the long-standing bankruptcy law was recently usurped so that a group of junior creditors (with strong political connections) of a high-profile automaker were made more "whole" than the senior creditors--all in plain sight and in the name of fairness and sacrifice.
I'm talking, of course, of recent events at Chrysler, and more specifically, of a decision by the current administration that helps more than 100,000 workers and retirees in the short term but may well be harmful to countless others over the long term. The reason? The cost of capital for a whole host of U.S. businesses just went up.
Eric Landry does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.