Lost Momentum
Momentum investing: Lost cause or comeback kid?
Momentum investing: Lost cause or comeback kid?
These are difficult times for momentum investors. A horrific 2008 put the exclamation point on an awful decade, during which their style worked in only two years, really--three if they were lucky.
Momentum investing is based on the idea that people underestimate change, both for the better and for the worse. Practitioners typically buy stocks of companies that have surprised Wall Street by beating earnings and revenue estimates. It helps, too, if analysts are boosting their estimates. Advocates of "Big Mo" don't usually care much about valuation. And momentum investors are often quick on the trigger, selling at the first sign of a reversal of the pattern.
One recent sign of the growing disillusionment with momentum strategies came when Vanguard removed Turner Investment Partners as co-manager of Vanguard Growth Equity . The firing came nearly 10 years after Vanguard adopted the fund from Turner. Had you invested $10,000 at the time Vanguard rebranded the fund in June 2000 and sold at the end of 2008, you'd be down to $4,217.
That got me thinking. If Vanguard threw in the towel on Turner, one of the best momentum investors, is the strategy washed up? It's certainly sobering that Vanguard, which has such a strong record of picking outside money managers, would choose one that turned out to be such a disappointing performer.
Elsewhere, a number of firms are turning away from momentum. AIM Funds stopped using the strategy in some funds and de-emphasized it in others after the firm got burned in this decade's first bear market. Others who played the momentum game, such as Garrett Van Wagoner, have completely given up.
What happened to momentum? The biggest problem was that its practitioners rode the Internet bubble to great heights in the 1990s, then spent most of this decade relinquishing those outsized gains. If that's the end of the story, momentum ought to enjoy a nice run over the next decade. After all, about 10 years ago investors and the media were raising the same question about value managers, after they had turned in several years of pitiful performance, and many either retired or were fired. (I figure that asking about the death of momentum is my contribution to the strategy's comeback.)
But hold on. Momentum investing may also be losing its effectiveness because corporate news and analysts' estimates are now processed at lightning speed. Find a winning momentum formula and 50 other money managers may quickly copy you and eliminate any edge. Hedge funds compound the problem. They helped push up share prices to exorbitant levels, then helped force them down when the funds had to sell stocks to meet redemption requests from unhappy clients.
On the plus side, momentum stocks are priced more favorably than in the past. Consider two purchases of the Brandywine Fund (BRWIX), which incorporates some momentum elements in its stock picking. Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) sold for 85 times earnings in 1999; in early April, its price/earnings ratio was 15. Gilead Sciences (GILD) had no P/E in 1999 because it had no profits; today, its P/E is 22--not dirt-cheap, but hardly off-the-charts for a fast-growing biotech company.
I wouldn't be surprised if momentum funds snap back over the next year or two. But it's tough to maintain an advantage when speed is everything, so you should limit your holdings in funds that emphasize super-fast growth to a single-digit percentage of your portfolio. Brandywine is one of my favorites. So is Turner Midcap Growth . The expenses aren't as low as Turner's former Vanguard fund, but it has done a good job buying stocks of midsize companies, traditionally the sweet spot for momentum investors.
This article originally appeared in Kiplinger's.
New! Fund Spy: Morningstar's Inside Secrets to Selecting Mutual Funds that Outperform. Save 24%! | ||||
Author Russel Kinnel, Morningstar's Director of Mutual Fund Research, expands on his enormously popular Morningstar� FundInvestor newsletter to assist you in navigating through thousands of funds and intelligently selecting the right ones for your portfolio. Filled with in-depth insights | and unparalleled expert advice, Fund Spy offers proven strategies to sharpen your fund investing skills by showing you methods on how to evaluate performance, assess fund managers, and ultimately choose funds that will help achieve your long-term financial goals. Learn more. | |||
$24.95$18.95 for Single copy | ||||
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.