2008's ETF Winners--Page 2
ETFs are gathering assets amid the market malaise.
ETFs are gathering assets amid the market malaise.
The performance of currency ETFs was all over the map during the course of the past year as we saw a massive unwinding of the carry trade--a popular hedge fund strategy where investors borrow in (or short) low-yielding currencies and invest (or go long) in higher-yielding currencies. The trick was that many of the hedge funds that crowded into this trade used excessive leverage in order to magnify the spreads they were earning. However, when the reality of the grim economic landscape set in (and commodity prices plunged through the floor), these hedge funds couldn't unwind their trades fast enough. Investor redemptions and margin calls greatly exacerbated this effect.
In the end, the Japanese yen topped the charts, in terms of currency appreciation, thanks to the mad rush of hedge funds buying the yen to cover their short positions. The reverse was true for the commodity-based, high-yielding currencies that were used for the other side of this trade. In the desperate race to unwind the ubiquitous carry trade, hedge funds were forced to sell high-yielding currencies like the Aussie, New Zealand, and Canadian dollar, ultimately leading to a devaluation of these commodity-based currencies.
Currency ETFs | |||
2008 | 2008 Cash Inflows (MM) | AUM (MM) | |
CurrencyShares Japenese Yen Trust (FXY) | 22.98 | (451.874) | 703.570 |
iPath JPY/USD Exchange Rate ETN (JYN) | 22.90 | (67.156) | 12.951 |
CurrencyShares Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) | 7.51 | 218.185 | 436.675 |
CurrencyShares Euro Trust (FXE) | -1.65 | (239.663) | 682.204 |
iPath EUR/USD Exchange Rate ETN (ERO) | -2.24 | (89.311) | 8.185 |
* Data as of 12-31-2008. |
Through the malaise and credit crisis of 2008, U.S. Treasuries proved to be the save haven of choice for risk-averse investors. In fact, as investors fled for safety, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell to just marginally above 2%--the lowest level seen in more than 70 years. This is a testament to just how much fear was in the markets in 2008. Investors are willing to accept real negative yields on their money in exchange for the comfort of having the explicit backing of the U.S. government. With large banking institutions failing left and right over the course of the year, it's no wonder investors were hesitant to simply park their cash in the bank. Now, the question is whether Treasuries are in a bubble. We'd encourage investors to read Scott Burns' recent article on this topic, as we think this will continue to be a hot subject as we move through 2009.
Fixed-Income ETFs | |||
2008 | 2008 Cash Inflows (MM) | AUM (MM) | |
Vanguard Extended Dur Tre Index (EDV) | 55.46 | 21.221 | 51.519 |
iShares Barclays 20+Yr Treas Bond (TLT) | 33.77 | (167.925) | 1,892.624 |
SPDR Lehman Long Term Treasury (TLO) | 24.14 | (0.608) | 25.409 |
PowerShares 1-30 Laddered Treasury (PLW) | 21.82 | 69.150 | 99.137 |
iShares Barclays 10-20 Yr Treasury Bond (TLH) | 20.10 | 58.174 | 169.224 |
* Data as of 12-31-2008. |
1 2 3 | Next Page >>
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.