The Current State of the U.S. Auto Industry
Not bailing out Detroit would be a disaster for the U.S. auto industry.
As of the time this article is being written, General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Chrysler LLC (the Detroit 3) have just submitted proposals to Congress and testified justifying why each firm deserves government aid. Assuming no private sources of capital or government aid appear, GM and Chrysler will be forced to file for bankruptcy this month. Ford has more time but is heading down the same path. This situation is very fluid and the outcome is very uncertain, but whatever happens will have a large impact on the entire automotive supply chain. The outcome for the Detroit 3 will likely take one of three forms, which we discuss in turn.
Option 1: No Assistance--Followed by Bankruptcy
First, if the government does not provide any assistance, GM and Chrysler will likely file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. This could quickly lead to Chapter 7 liquidation as neither company has enough cash to operate in bankruptcy for very long. This outcome would be the economic equivalent of dropping an atomic bomb in the U.S. manufacturing sector. A Nov. 4 study by the Center for Automotive Research estimates such a scenario would cause 2.5 million jobs to be lost throughout the entire U.S. economy; over three years, it would cost the private sector $275.7 billion in lost personal income and would cost the government $108.1 billion. Bankruptcy in GM and Chrysler could cause Ford's distress to accelerate as supplier failures would hurt all automakers. Ford and GM have 80% supplier overlap and even healthy companies such as Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC) use some of the same suppliers as the Detroit 3. This outcome is the least likely outcome, however, as we do not think the Obama administration will want to put more factory workers in key electoral states out of work, and Speaker Pelosi stated on Dec. 2 that bankruptcy was not an option.
David Whiston does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.