ETF Wire: Slew of Commodities, Foreign Funds Launch
Plus, new filings for infrastructure, nuclear, and timber funds, and more.
Plus, new filings for infrastructure, nuclear, and timber funds, and more.
Following is a quick synopsis of goings-on in the exchange-traded fund industry, including our big-picture view of the ETF landscape, a rundown of recent ETF analyses, feature articles, and blog postings, as well as links to ETFs that recently launched.
New ETF Article
This week, we put out a piece entitled "ETF Picks to Put Our Market Outlook into Action" that marries our stock analysts' recently published sector outlooks to various ETF "picks." In that way, if you're looking for an ETF that taps into some of the profitable themes and opportunities that our stock analysts tick off, you'll have a worthwhile short list to work from.
New ETF Analyst Reports
As you might have heard, we recently launched our new-and-improved ETF Analyst Reports on Morningstar.com. Those reports are available to Premium Members. If you're not a Premium Member yet, check out our recent piece, "Our Take on One of 2007's Hottest Emerging-Markets ETFs", in which you'll find a sample ETF Analyst Report. To see more ETF analyses, take a free, 14-day Premium Membership trial.
We continued to publish new Analyst Reports recently. Last Wednesday, for instance, my colleague Harry Milling added SPDR S&P Metals & Mining (XME) to coverage. The fund is quirky--it owns a collection of domestic miners and metals-related producers, despite the fact that some of the biggest players can be found abroad. Nevertheless, metals and mining has been a subject of intense interest lately given the global commodities boom and attendant benefits to miners. But does that make this ETF a buy? Harry sets out to answer that question in his write-up.
Last Friday, my colleague Emiko Kurotsu provided her take on SPDR S&P Retail (XRT). Retailer stocks have gotten crushed in recent months as fears of a prolonged consumer malaise have set in. Nevertheless, our consumer stock analyst team thinks some of the selling looks overdone, creating bargains in the process. The question is whether the whole--this ETF--exceeds the sum of its parts. Emiko explores that issue, among others, in her Analyst Report.
Also on Friday, Harry Milling brought PowerShares Dynamic Oil & Gas Services (PXJ) under coverage. We're not sold on the fund's quantitative stock-selection approach, which hasn't reaped major dividends thus far when compared with ETFs that track traditional indexes. Nevertheless, Harry has drilled down into the portfolio, in a manner of speaking, to see whether the fund's holdings are attractive on a fundamental basis. The verdict? Check out Harry's Analyst Report.
And yesterday Emiko Kurotsu put out a report on iShares S&P Global Energy (IXC). It's a one-of-a-kind ETF in the sense that it's the only broad-based energy fund that dabbles in foreign stocks. But is it distinctive enough to justify its higher expense ratio? Emiko sets out to answer that question in her Analyst Report.
New ETF Analyst Notes
In addition to new reports, we also put out several ETF Analyst Notes last week. Each week our analysts canvass the sectors they cover and prepare an overview of noteworthy recent developments. Following are links to Analyst Notes that we put out last week summarizing our analysts' take on the latest goings-on in the sectors they cover, and providing commentary on the impact these issues are likely to have on relevant ETFs.
Blog Roll
Here are some of the topics we've covered recently in our ETF-related blog, Basis Pointing.
New Listings
Following is a tally of ETFs and ETNs that began trading in the last week or so (we've linked to the relevant prospectus whenever possible).
By our count, 56 ETFs have launched thus far in 2008, with commodity (20) and currency (10) funds being most common. ETNs have accounted for roughly one in every two launches this year.
ETF Pipeline
After a lull, the pipeline sprung to life again. ETF providers filed for the following products in the past week or so. For a capsule summary of each of these funds, see this post in our Basis Pointing blog.
Also, as mentioned above, the registration statement for one ETF--Haverford Quality 250--was withdrawn this week.
Taking Stock
Want to know how some of the most popular ETFs have fared? This performance summary should whet your appetite.
If it's the leaders and laggards that interest you, then give our best/worst performers list a look.
Finally, looking beyond ETFs to the benchmarks and industries themselves, you can find a wealth of performance data on Morningstar.com, including performance stats by indexes, sectors, and industries. Also, be sure to check out our quote reports for the Dow, S&P 500, Russell 2000, and Nasdaq Composite indexes.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.