Has Employment Peaked? -- Page 2
A more robust look at jobs data may hold the answer.
A more robust look at jobs data may hold the answer.
So, how leading is this leading indicator? If we look at the historical temporary employment services numbers, a rarely publicized figure from the BLS' monthly Employment Situation report, we can see that temporary employment growth turned negative about eight months before the rest of employment posted its first decline in the last recession. (Temporary employment dropped 1% in December 2000, while total employment less temporary employment posted its first decline--0.1%--in August 2001.)
What Is the Data Telling Us Now?
Temporary employment growth turned negative in December 2006 and has remained negative for 12 of the last 13 months. Unfortunately, temporary employment data became available only in 1990, so it's hard to say what a long-run average lead time is, but it's safe to say this is a worrisome trend.
Data from staffing companies, the primary providers of temporary employees, lend further credence to this bearish outlook. Most staffing companies, such as those Bill mentioned earlier, have continued to see revenue growth, but a growing portion of the top-line boost has come from price increases, while in some cases volume has become a drag. As is common in many industries, price increases (bill rates, in this case) often lag the onset of a supply shortage, eventually leading to the counterintuitive situation of rising prices with falling demand (volume). If volume continues to fall, as appears likely, employers will begin to realize that there is an abundance of workers available, pressuring bill rate growth.
What Does All This Mean?
At Morningstar, our equity analysts focus primarily on bottom-up company analysis, but we'd be remiss to ignore persistent trends within economic data. As Bill said earlier, chinks in the labor market's armor are forming, and the data increasingly suggest more, and possibly larger, dents are still to come.
In an upcoming Stock Strategist article, we'll dig deeper into various attributes of temporary employment and its relationship to total employment. We'll also add a microeconomic view through a profile of our employment services coverage universe. This should let us separate good stocks from the bad, given the challenging macro environment.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.