Is the Era of the Star Fund Manager Over?
We wouldn't call it history just yet.
In October, Janus announced that it was filling the void left on Janus Fund (JANSX) by one of its stars, David Corkins, with two managers instead of one. Days later, news surfaced that Fidelity plans to have a broad lineup of managers running some new funds rather than entrusting them to just one person. In a different twist on the same theme, Vanguard has gradually moved more to a system of multiple managers over the years. But, in this case, Vanguard has combined multiple outside subadvisors to manage several of its funds.
We've noticed a growing trend toward multiple managers at a number of fund companies. There are several reasons driving a shift. For one, institutions, consultants, and financial advisors may be reticent to entrust client assets with a fund run by a single manager who's not backed by a very deep team. Those constituencies drive a lion's share of flows, and fund shops are paying attention to what they favor. Fund companies are also painfully aware that investors who buy a fund because of the manager often run for the hills when that person leaves or retires. Thus, a move to multiple managers can help smooth over high-profile departures and reduce the rush of outflows that often come with it. Finally, there are more assets than ever in mutual funds, and the job has grown more complex.
Perhaps the most enticing reason for fund companies to consider a multiple-manager system is the success that American Funds, Dodge & Cox, and Primecap have had with it. Those firms' ability to deliver performance, gather assets, and handle growth has driven rivals to consider whether a group of managers is a better mousetrap. At the very same time, some legendary single-manager funds, such as Bill Miller's Legg Mason Value (LMVTX) and Bill Nygren's charges at Oakmark, have hit rough patches.
Karen Dolan does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.