Morningstar's 2006 Contrarian Portfolio
10 stocks for investors who aren't afraid to go against the crowd.
10 stocks for investors who aren't afraid to go against the crowd.
Contrarian investment strategies posit that attractive returns are earned by investing in stocks that are out of favor with most investors. A few years ago, we decided to test this theory, and started analyzing Morningstar's Web site traffic to compare the returns from stocks that are popular with our subscribers with those that are unpopular. Although we believe that investing in the stocks that are most popular with Morningstar's audience offers a good shot of achieving returns that outperform the market, our research indicates that even higher returns seem more likely in less-popular, or "contrarian," stocks.
At Morningstar, we can directly measure a stock's popularity--or lack thereof--with our subscribers. Using our Web site data, we can count unique page views for each stock we cover, and then create a page rank that measures the stock's popularity with our clients. We define a page view as one client clicking on the Analyst Report for a stock once. This yields a direct, and unique, measure of "popularity." For example, in 2005, Microsoft (MSFT) was our most-viewed Analyst Report (with a page rank of 1), while Monolithic Power Systems (page rank 8,006) was least popular. By creating an ordinal ranking of the stocks we cover using our page ranks, we can easily identify the most "contrarian" stocks we cover.
We continue to acknowledge that our methodology isn't perfect. Our 5-star stocks are the most popular, so they generate more page views, and thus higher page rankings. What's more, well-known stocks tend to get more page views regardless of value or market activity. Our page-rank data is also a partial measure of our subscribers' interests, which tend to lean heavily toward undervalued stocks in general. Finally, we can't prove that Morningstar's subscribers are a representative sample of the financial markets. However, we think the data are reliable enough to prove useful, and any strategy that helps investors uncover good businesses that they can buy with an attractive margin of safety has merit.
To get started, let's review the 10 most popular stocks among Morningstar subscribers in 2003, 2004, and 2005:
2003's Most Popular Stocks | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Rank | 2003 Return ( % ) | 2004 Return ( % ) | 2005 Return ( % ) | |
![]() | ||||
Pfizer (PFE) | 1 | 17.76 | -22.31 | -10.45 |
![]() | ||||
Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) | 2 | 5.73 | 0.51 | -10.26 |
![]() | ||||
Microsoft (MSFT) | 3 | 6.81 | 8.95 | -0.94 |
![]() | ||||
General Electric (GE) | 4 | 30.75 | 20.68 | -1.48 |
![]() | ||||
Home Depot (HD) | 5 | 49.42 | 21.47 | -4.35 |
![]() | ||||
Altria Group (MO) | 6 | 42.74 | 18.38 | 27.30 |
![]() | ||||
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 7 | -2.11 | 25.17 | -3.22 |
![]() | ||||
Cisco Systems (CSCO) | 8 | 84.96 | -20.26 | -11.39 |
![]() | ||||
General Dynamics (GD) | 9 | 15.97 | 17.40 | 10.53 |
![]() | ||||
First Data | 10 | 16.28 | 3.72 | 1.72 |
![]() | ||||
Avg (equally weighted) | 6 | 26.83 | 7.37 | -0.25 |
![]() | ||||
S&P 500 | 28.69 | 10.88 | 4.83 | |
![]() | ||||
Outperformance | -1.86 | -3.51 | -5.08 | |
![]() |
2004's Most Popular Stocks | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Rank | 2004 Return ( % ) | 2005 Return ( % ) | ||
![]() | ||||
Pfizer (PFE) | 1 | -22.31 | -10.45 | |
![]() | ||||
Microsoft (MSFT) | 2 | 8.95 | -0.94 | |
![]() | ||||
Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) | 3 | 0.51 | -10.26 | |
![]() | ||||
General Electric (GE) | 4 | 20.68 | -1.48 | |
![]() | ||||
Merck (MRK) | 5 | -27.76 | 3.70 | |
![]() | ||||
Coca-Cola (KO) | 6 | -16.12 | -0.50 | |
![]() | ||||
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 7 | 25.17 | -3.22 | |
![]() | ||||
Anheuser-Busch (BUD) | 8 | -1.95 | -13.29 | |
![]() | ||||
Home Depot (HD) | 9 | 21.47 | -4.35 | |
![]() | ||||
Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK.B) | 10 | 4.30 | -0.02 | |
![]() | ||||
Avg (equally weighted) | 6 | 1.29 | -4.08 | |
![]() | ||||
S&P 500 | 10.88 | 4.83 | ||
![]() | ||||
Outperformance | -9.59 | -8.91 | ||
![]() |
2005's Most Popular Stocks | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Rank | 2005 Return ( % ) | |||
![]() | ||||
Microsoft (MSFT) | 1 | -0.94 | ||
![]() | ||||
Pfizer (PFE) | 2 | -10.45 | ||
![]() | ||||
Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) | 3 | -10.26 | ||
![]() | ||||
Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK.B) | 4 | -0.02 | ||
![]() | ||||
Coca-Cola (KO) | 5 | -0.50 | ||
![]() | ||||
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 6 | -3.22 | ||
![]() | ||||
Anheuser-Busch (BUD) | 7 | -13.29 | ||
![]() | ||||
General Electric (GE) | 8 | -1.48 | ||
![]() | ||||
ExxonMobil (XOM) | 9 | 11.80 | ||
![]() | ||||
Dell | 10 | -28.93 | ||
![]() | ||||
Avg (equally weighted) | 6 | -5.73 | ||
![]() | ||||
S&P 500 | 4.83 | |||
![]() | ||||
Outperformance | -10.56 | |||
![]() |
While most of these stocks are certainly popular, their returns aren't consistently attractive. The 2003 stocks delivered positive returns in 2003 and 2004, but they have lagged the returns of the S&P 500 in each of the last three years. The 2004 stocks underperformed the S&P 500 by about 9 percentage points over the last two years. And 2005's most popular stocks were even worse, lagging the S&P 500 by more than 10 percentage points, with only ExxonMobil (XOM) generating a positive return.
Let's review the returns of Morningstar's 10 least popular stocks for each of the last three years. If our "contrarian" theory has merit, these should be higher.
2003's Least Popular Stocks | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Rank | 2003 Return ( % ) | 2004 Return ( % ) | 2005 Return ( % ) | |
![]() | ||||
Neiman Marcus | 1,907 | 76.60 | 34.57 | ** |
![]() | ||||
Gabelli Asset Manage (GBL) | 1,645 | 32.56 | 26.50 | -8.86 |
![]() | ||||
Knight Ridder | 1,467 | 24.48 | -11.83 | -3.30 |
![]() | ||||
Navistar | 1,403 | 97.00 | -8.17 | -34.92 |
![]() | ||||
Citizens Comm | 1,288 | 17.73 | 34.09 | -4.06 |
![]() | ||||
Getty Images | 1,265 | 64.09 | 37.34 | 29.66 |
![]() | ||||
Sealed Air (SEE) | 1,251 | 45.15 | -1.61 | 5.44 |
![]() | ||||
VISX | 1,210 | 141.65 | 11.75 | 1.60 |
![]() | ||||
Barra | 1,201 | ** | ** | ** |
![]() | ||||
Bausch & Lomb | 1,199 | 46.11 | 25.30 | 6.14 |
![]() | ||||
Avg (equally weighted) | 1,384 | 54.54 | 14.79 | -0.83 |
![]() | ||||
S&P 500 | 28.69 | 10.88 | 4.83 | |
![]() | ||||
Outperformance | 25.85 | 3.91 | -5.66 | |
![]() | ||||
** Was acquired, data unavailable |
2004's Least Popular Stocks | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Rank | 2004 Return ( % ) | 2005 Return ( % ) | ||
![]() | ||||
Equity Lifestyle Prop (ELS) | 6,393 | 20.88 | 24.76 | |
![]() | ||||
Pemstar | 6,377 | -44.99 | -18.23 | |
![]() | ||||
WebMethods | 6,324 | -20.77 | 6.93 | |
![]() | ||||
Tim Hella ADR** | 6,278 | 45.09 | ** | |
![]() | ||||
Distribucion y Serv ADR | 5,816 | -11.12 | 7.75 | |
![]() | ||||
Molex | 5,732 | -13.66 | -12.91 | |
![]() | ||||
Marsh A | 5,667 | 8.57 | -17.88 | |
![]() | ||||
Kindred Healthcare | 5,630 | 15.24 | -13.99 | |
![]() | ||||
United National Group A | 5,494 | 5.38 | -1.40 | |
![]() | ||||
Com. Brasileira de Dist. (CBD) | 5,445 | 2.76 | 29.80 | |
![]() | ||||
Avg (equally weighted) | 5,916 | 0.74 | 0.48 | |
![]() | ||||
S&P 500 | 10.88 | 4.83 | ||
![]() | ||||
Outperformance | -10.14 | -4.35 | ||
![]() | ||||
** Was acquired, data unavailable |
2005's Least Popular Stocks | ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Rank | 2005 Return ( % ) | |||
![]() | ||||
Monolithic Power | 8,006 | 61.18 | ||
![]() | ||||
Calpine | 7,437 | -94.67 | ||
![]() | ||||
Charles Schwab (SCHW) | 7,373 | 22.57 | ||
![]() | ||||
Tasty Baking | 6,830 | -4.82 | ||
![]() | ||||
MSC.Software | 6,807 | 62.37 | ||
![]() | ||||
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) | 6,631 | 22.52 | ||
![]() | ||||
Stewart Enterprises | 6,577 | -21.53 | ||
![]() | ||||
National Interstate | 6,574 | 23.15 | ||
![]() | ||||
Petroleum Geo-Serv ADR (PGS) | 6,125 | 49.78 | ||
![]() | ||||
Gramercy Capital | 5,765 | 17.84 | ||
![]() | ||||
Avg (equally weighted) | 6,813 | 13.84 | ||
![]() | ||||
S&P 500 | 4.83 | |||
![]() | ||||
Outperformance | 9.01 | |||
![]() |
And for the most part, they are. The returns on our least popular 2003 stocks more than doubled the returns of the most popular stocks in 2003 and 2004, and were in line with the returns of the most popular stocks in 2005. The returns from 2004's least popular stocks lagged the S&P 500, but handsomely beat the return of the most popular stocks last year. And for 2005, the returns on the least popular stocks bested the returns of the most popular stocks by almost 20 percentage points. One aside is important at this point--note the average page rank of these stocks. For the 2003 stocks it was 1,384; for the 2004 stocks, 5,916; and for the 2005 stocks it was 6,813. In other words, on average during 2005, there were more than 6,800 stocks that were more popular among Morningstar's subscribers, so we're definitely in contrarian territory. (Morningstar covers only about 1,900 stocks, so the other rankings reflect page views for stocks we don't cover).
>> Click here for Part 2 of the article and Morningstar's Contrarian Portfolio.
Justin Fuller does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.