Fund Times: Vanguard Adopts New Benchmark for SRI Fund
Plus, TIAA-CREF tries to alter the past, news on PBHG, and more.
Plus, TIAA-CREF tries to alter the past, news on PBHG, and more.
By year-end 2005, Vanguard will change the primary benchmark for Vanguard Calvert Social Index to the FTSE4Good US Select Index. The international FTSE4Good Index was first launched in 2001 by the London-based FTSE Group to "measure the performance of companies that meet globally recognized corporate responsibility standards, and to facilitate investment in those companies." Specific details have yet to be released on the makeup of Vanguard's narrower version of the FTSE index. However, the FTSE4Good US Index invests in more than 700 large-capitalization U.S. stocks focusing on three areas: environmental sustainability, upholding and supporting universal human rights, and developing positive relationships with stakeholders. The index will not include companies that are in the tobacco, alcohol, adult entertainment, firearms, gambling, or nuclear power industries, or those that violate fair-labor practices or equal-opportunity standards.
Although the press release stated that the change would not have "a material impact" on the fund's 0.25% expense ratio, we suspect that Vanguard may have moved to a new index provider to save a few basis points in expenses. In particular, if Vanguard eventually releases a socially responsible ETF using this index, a lower fee structure would be a plus. And although we haven't seen the composition of the new index, it may well be less growth-oriented than traditional socially responsible indexes.
Whatever the case, Vanguard's decision to change the fund's index is a blow to socially responsible heavyweight Calvert.
TIAA-CREF Tries Again
We first reported in mid July that TIAA-CREF wanted to change the expense structure for most of its funds. However, shareholders rejected the idea, which would have seen fees rise in some cases from two to six times what they cost now. But, a Wall Street Journal article this past week claimed that the firm is considering holding another vote and lobbying several large institutional clients to change their votes.
Aside from the fact that we view TIAA-CREF's continuted attempts at raising fees to be extremely unfriendly to shareholders, we're hard pressed to understand how institutional voters--who mostly represent 529 plans--can honor their fiduciary responsibilities by changing their votes. Moreover, one has to wonder why TIAA-CREF's fund board doesn't consider hiring Vanguard as the funds' advisor, if TIAA-CREF is truly incapable of managing the funds at their current expense levels.
Big Changes at PBHG
Liberty Ridge, formerly known as Pilgrim Baxter, will cease to exist as a money manager at the end of October. All of the firm's funds will be subadvised by a New York-based, institutional/separate account shop called Forstmann Leff, in which Liberty Ridge parent Old Mutual intends to buy a 60% stake. The funds will all take on the moniker "Old Mutual Forstmann Leff".
Two PBHG managers, Jerome Heppelmann and Sam Baker, plus four analysts will likely join the new firm, but continue to work out of Wayne, Pa., running PBHG Large Cap , PBHG Focused , PBHG Tech & Communications , and PBHG Emerging Growth , plus the growth half of PBHG Strategic Small Company (PSSAX). The remainder of the funds will be run by Forstmann. Incidentally, several planned fund mergers were cancelled, but mergers will likely occur following the acquisition of Forstmann at the end of October. Although Forstmann has not run open-end mutual funds to date, the firm's track record managing separate accounts is a mixed bag. For example, their mid-cap offering is a solid performer, frequently beating the category average on a year-to-year basis, whereas its large-cap option has had a hard time standing out from the crowd.
Finally, we're happy to hear that the funds will also see further fee cuts beyond those mandated by the market-timing settlement.
Etc.
Oberweis Asset Management, Inc. (OAM), launched a new fund, Oberweis China Opportunities (OBCHX). The fund is managed by James Oberweis, who also manages Oberweis Micro-Cap (OBMCX) and Oberweis Mid-Cap . Vanessa Shiu, based out of OAM’s Hong Kong office, will perform analytical work for the fund. The fund will target smaller Chinese companies that focus on the increasing purchasing power of the Chinese consumer. Additionally, the fund will employ the firm's "Oberweis Octagon" strategy, looking at such things as rapid growth in revenue, rapid growth in pretax income, and reasonable price/earnings ratio in relation to the company's underlying growth rate, among others. The fund is expected to carry an expense ratio of 2.49%, which is more costly than the typical Pacific/Asia ex-Japan fund's 2% levy. This offering is just the latest in a line of funds trying to make a play on China's growth, and as with most of the others, it is best avoided.
Former manager Dan Ahrens left Mutuals Advisors on Sept. 7, 2005 for undisclosed reasons. Charles Norton has replaced Ahrens on two of the firm's funds, Vice Fund (VICEX) and Generation Wave Growth . Norton has no public experience managing open-end mutual funds, although he previously worked as an analyst for a New York-based hedge fund.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.