Skip to Content
Stocks

20 Best Healthcare Companies to Invest In

These companies largely earn their competitive advantage from intangible assets, and their stocks are great choices for an investor’s watchlist.

These companies stand out from the competition and can be good choices for long-term investing.

Find the full list of companies and read about our selection methodology.

The strongest long-term opportunities for healthcare companies primarily fall in three industries: drug manufacturing, medical devices, and diagnostics and research.

And all 20 of the best healthcare companies to invest in have intangible assets that provide a wide moat against competitors. This intangible-asset advantage is often derived from either patents or proprietary technology.

Patents are temporary government licenses that exclude competition from copying an invention. For example, in pharmaceutical companies, patents are necessary owing to the ease with which some drugs can be replicated. Similarly, patents are vital in the medical-devices industry to protect companies’ product designs.

Proprietary technology encompasses more-complex processes and tools than a company’s patents might cover—many companies keep their intellectual property as a trade secret rather than provide a public description in a patent application. In general, the more sophisticated and customized a product or service becomes, the more that proprietary technology plays a role in driving competitive advantage. In healthcare, this is seen in biopharma, medical devices, and contract research organizations.

Here, we highlight the 20 healthcare companies that made our list of the Best Companies to Own in 2024. These companies earned their spot on the list by both having carved out wide moats and having made smart capital decisions.

Because this list is built for the long term, rather than to identify presently undervalued companies, it may not be the right time to buy all these names. Rather, we believe these healthcare companies are strong choices for an investor’s watchlist.

You should consider buying only when they’re trading below our price/fair value estimate, which assesses whether a stock’s price is high or low compared with its fundamental value.

Company Name
Ticker
Industry
Moat Source — Cost Advantage
Moat Source — Efficient Scale
Moat Source — Intangible Assets
Moat Source — Network Effect
Moat Source — Switch Cost
Agilent Technologies IncADiagnostics and ResearchNoNoYesNoYes
Thermo Fisher Scientific IncTMODiagnostics and ResearchNoNoYesNoYes
Waters CorpWATDiagnostics and ResearchNoNoYesNoYes
AstraZeneca PLCAZNDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Bristol-Myers Squibb CoBMYDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Gilead Sciences IncGILDDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
GSK PLCGSKDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Johnson and JohnsonJNJDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Merck and Co IncMRKDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Novartis AGNVSDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Pfizer IncPFEDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Roche Holding AGRHHBYDrug Manufacturers - GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Sanofi SASNYDrug Manufacturers - GeneralYesNoYesNoNo
Haleon PLCHLNDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericYesNoYesNoNo
Zoetis IncZTSDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GeneralYesNoYesNoNo
Medtronic PLCMDTMedical DevicesNoNoYesNoNo
Stryker CorpSYKMedical DevicesNoNoYesNoYes
Zimmer Biomet Holdings IncZBHMedical DevicesNoNoYesNoYes
Coloplast A/SCLPBYMedical Instruments & SuppliesNoNoYesNoYes
West Pharmaceutical Services IncWSTMedical Instruments &SuppliesNoNoYesNoYes

Intangible Assets Give Drug Manufacturers Their Edge

All the drug manufacturers on the best companies list, both general and specialty, gain an edge from their intangible assets.

Pfizer PFE is a prominent member of the group. “Pfizer’s patent-protected drugs carry strong pricing power that enables the firm to generate returns on invested capital in excess of its cost of capital,” writes Morningstar sector director Damien Conover. “The patents give the company time to develop the next generation of drugs before generic competition arises.”

Johnson & Johnson JNJ, the world’s largest and most diverse healthcare firm with a market cap of $373 billion as of Dec. 11, 2023, also thrives in this area. Conover notes that Johnson & Johnson’s wide moat is “supported by intellectual property in the drug group … and strong brand power from the consumer group. Despite carrying some lower-margin divisions, J&J maintains strong pricing power and has posted gross margins above 70% during the past four years, validating its strong competitive position.”

Ten of the 20 companies with a moat driven by intangible assets have an additional moat source, either a cost advantage or a high switching cost.

Switching Costs Aid Medical Device and Diagnostic Industries

Of the six qualifying companies in either the diagnostic and research or medical devices industries, all have an advantage from intangible assets, and five benefit further from switching costs. (Medtronic MDT is the lone company among them that doesn’t have a switching cost advantage.)

With a market cap of $191 billion as of Dec. 11, 2023, Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO is the largest of the diagnostics and research companies on the list. Thermo Fisher sells scientific instruments and laboratory equipment, diagnostics consumables, and life science reagents.

Like key competitors Agilent A and Waters WAT, Thermo Fisher’s analytical instrument business benefits from intangible assets and switching costs, says Morningstar Holland’s director of equity research Alex Morozov. “The intangible asset is the firm’s differentiated technology and its leadership positions within tools such as mass spectrometry, chromatography, microscopy, and others. … The business is also rather sticky, particularly within the biopharma end market, where the regulatory process assures high switching costs. Production methods have to stay uniform throughout the lifecycle of a drug, which often extends beyond the lifecycle of a typical mass spectrometer.”

Medical devices, for their part, have high switching costs because surgeons develop expertise in using a differentiated set of tools and device systems have component parts that are designed to work together.

“The highest switching costs in medical devices is in orthopedics, where all the device makers have their own differentiated implants and the tools to install the implants,” says Morningstar senior analyst Debbie Wang.

“It takes years for the orthopedic surgeons to become practiced enough on one vendor’s tools and implants to deliver optimal patient outcomes, and after they have mastered them, they are reluctant to switch to another vendor where they’d have to relearn some of it,” Wang explains. “For this reason, the switching costs are the highest for companies like Zimmer Biomet ZBH and Stryker SYK.”

2 Top Medical Instruments and Supplies Companies

Tied only with specialty and generic drug manufacturers, the medical instruments and supplies subindustry has the fewest representatives on our list: just Coloplast A/S CLPBY and West Pharmaceutical Services WST.

Coloplast is the market leader of ostomy and continence care, holding 40% of global market share. Morningstar sector strategist Debbie Wang notes: “Though ostomy products do benefit from some protection of intellectual property, we think the moat is also rooted in sticky end-user relationships.”

West Pharmaceutical Services, for its part, is the global market leader in primary packaging and delivery components for injectable therapeutics. The company has two moat sources: intangible assets and switching costs. As for the latter, Morningstar sector strategist Karen Andersen notes: “Any component that comes in direct contact with a drug product must be written into the drug application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and remains on file for the life of the product. Practically, this means West remains the primary packaging provider for the entire time a drug remains on market.”

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

More on this Topic

Sponsor Center