Choose Your All-Weather Fund with Care
Some moderate-allocation funds have risks you shouldn't ignore.
Some moderate-allocation funds have risks you shouldn't ignore.
Moderation-allocation funds have attracted quite a bit of attention since the beginning of the last bear market. In fact, they've continued to attract attention even after this past year's turnaround: For example, they received nearly $5.5 billion in net inflows in April, according to Financial Research Corporation, which is $1.3 billion more than the runners-up, large-value offerings, collected. And moderate-allocation funds have also been the most popular type of offering for the year to date, with approximately $23 billion in net inflows.
This doesn't come as a shock. The moderate-allocation category contains well over 300 offerings, and many of its members are well established and successful funds that work quite well as core holdings. What's more, these funds mix stocks and bonds in one portfolio, and thus offer more stability than all-stock funds, but better capital-appreciation potential than funds devoted solely to bonds. Therefore, they have understandable appeal in tumultuous conditions.
But make sure you do your homework before buying or adding to a moderate-allocation offering right now. For one thing, all funds in the group are not the same--not even close. Though a sizable majority of these funds focuses on larger-cap-blend or larger-cap-growth stocks, many concentrate on value or smaller-cap names. These value and smaller-cap fans have enjoyed a substantial advantage over the majority in recent years--and have generally performed quite well--because the types of stocks they favor have fared far better than growth and large-cap stocks in the early 2000s. But take care: Bargain- and smaller-cap-oriented moderate-allocation funds do come with risks that shouldn't be ignored.
American Funds American Balanced (ABALX) received approximately $5.3 billion in inflows in the first four months of 2004, which is tops among all moderate-allocation offerings and second among all funds. This isn’t a surprise. The fund began the year with close to $30 billion in assets; it boasts an excellent long-term record; and it's part of one of the most respected families around. What’s more, it posted its fourth straight strong year in 2003, thanks to its good stock selection as well as its hard-core large-value discipline. Just remember that the fund's emphasis on cheap blue chips can leave it lagging, as its subpar late-1990s returns attest.
American Funds Income Fund of America (AMECX) hasn’t attracted quite as much money as its sibling this year, but it has seen roughly $3.8 billion in inflows and remains the biggest moderate-allocation offering around. That makes sense given its impressive overall risk/reward profile and other attributes. Nonetheless, it's crucial to note that management's commitment to dividend-paying stocks, which was a boon in recent years, was a burden in the late 1990s and is likely to weigh the fund down whenever tech and other growth stocks lead the way. Moreover, this fund's considerable girth severely limits its agility.
Oakmark Equity & Income (OAKBX) is another popular moderate-allocation offering that looks especially good these days. This fund grew from less than $60 million in assets at the end of 1999 up to roughly $7 billion in late April 2004, as it crushed its peers during each of the first four years of this decade. Oakmark, wisely, just closed this fund to certain brokers and intermediaries, so asset growth isn't likely to be a big problem here going forward. That said, this fund is a hard-core bargain hunter and has the freedom to make full use of the market-cap spectrum, so its strategy has been quite in favor in recent years. It won't always find itself in the market's sweet spot.
Finally, as always, don’t just pick names from the top of the performance charts. For example, it's important to note that Greenspring (GRSPX) and several of the other moderate-allocation funds that boast the best three- and five-year returns at present have benefited from their taste for smaller caps as well as their miserly natures. Greenspring, in fact, normally sports one of the smallest average market caps in the moderate-allocation category plus big overweights in the financials and other traditional value sectors. Though these sorts of biases have been quite advantageous in the early 2000s, they also can backfire, as Greenspring's poor late-1990s showings make clear.
In short, it's essential to understand that many of the popular and successful moderate-allocation funds have enjoyed a real tailwind in recent years and that they are unlikely to do as well when conditions change and they encounter a significant headwind. Moreover, while American Funds American Balanced, American Funds Income Fund of America, Oakmark Equity & Income, and even Greenspring remain good long-term holdings for the right investors, moderate-allocation fans shouldn't forget about Pax World Balanced (PAXWX) and some of the other more-talented growth vehicles in the group.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.