Healthcare Stocks Dogged by U.S. Policy Concerns
Large biopharma names are undervalued while device and diagnostic industries look pricey.
Large biopharma names are undervalued while device and diagnostic industries look pricey.
As the markets have remained optimistic over the past 12 months, the Morningstar's US Healthcare Index has increased 21%, but this underperforms the broader equity market's 26% gain. We believe already high valuations in the devices/diagnostics industry combined with U.S. drug policy concerns lingering around biopharma stocks have both contributed to the lower relative performance of the healthcare segment. A long process around potential U.S. drug policy changes is likely weighing on the valuations of global stocks since the U.S. market represents a disproportionate share of profits for many global healthcare companies. We continue to expect only modest policy change.
Healthcare Sector Index Versus Market Index
Source: Morningstar analysts
We view the healthcare sector as slightly overvalued. Our coverage trades at a premium to our overall estimate of intrinsic value with the median price to fair value at 1.09. We see fewer "buys" in the sector, with roughly 25% of our coverage rated 4 or 5 stars.
Star Rating Distribution and Average P/FV for Sector and Key Industry Groups
Source: Morningstar analysts
However, we view the valuation in the sector as split between a general undervaluation in the larger biopharma group and an overvaluation in the device and diagnostics industries. The biopharma valuations imply a high degree of risk involving potential changes in U.S. healthcare policies targeting drug prices. While changes in U.S. drug pricing policies to help reduce out of pocket costs are likely, we don't envision major changes like international reference pricing due to the strong biopharma lobbying group, concerns about disrupting innovation, and a razor thin Democratic majority with different views than Republicans on addressing drug prices. Despite the uncertainty on drug policy, the outlook fundamentally for biopharma firms remains strong with low patent exposure and several new innovative drugs launching and gaining market share.
Conversely, many diagnostic companies look overvalued as they directly benefit from pandemic-related testing and vaccination activities. While the latest virus variants will likely continue driving higher testing volume, we anticipate this revenue to fade over the next few years, as testing becomes increasingly commoditized and vaccination levels grow.
While the coronavirus variants raise the bar to achieve herd immunity, we expect a return to near normal over the next two years in most developed markets as vaccinations climb and new effective oral treatments reach the market. Several players in the biopharma group will gain a windfall of cash from COVID vaccines, but we don't forecast a long tail of this revenue, which limits the valuation impact.
Global Vaccination Rates Continue to Grow
Source: Morningstar analysts
Massive Cash Windfall of COVID-19 Vaccines Through 2022
Source: Morningstar analysts
Top Picks
Biomarin Pharmaceutical (BMRN
)Star Rating: ★★★★
Economic Moat Rating: Narrow
Fair Value Estimate: $105
Fair Value Uncertainty: Medium
We view BioMarin as undervalued as the market overreacted to the delayed launch of hemophilia A gene therapy Roctavian. BioMarin's orphan-drug portfolio and strong late-stage pipeline continue to support a narrow moat rating, and despite Roctavian's delay (launch likely in 2022 instead of 2020), we're still bullish on the launch of achondroplasia drug vosoritide in 2021. In addition, we still think Roctavian data support the drug's safety and long-term efficacy, and competitors are just entering phase 3 trials. Similarly, BioMarin is far ahead of competitors in achondroplasia, which has no approved treatments.
Merck (MRK
)Star Rating: ★★★★
Economic Moat Rating: Wide
Fair Value Estimate: $94
Fair Value Uncertainty: Medium
Merck's combination of a wide lineup of high-margin drugs and vaccines along with a pipeline of new drugs should ensure strong returns on invested capital over the long term. Merck is well-positioned to gain further entrenchment in immuno-oncology with Keytruda, which holds a strong first-mover advantage in the large first-line non-small-cell lung cancer market with excellent data. Also, we expect Keytruda to gain approvals in early-treatment settings, which should open up underappreciated sales potential. Merck's vaccines look ready to drive further gains, led by human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil.
Zimmer Biomet (ZBH)
Star Rating: ★★★★★
Economic Moat Rating: Wide
Fair Value Estimate: $192
Fair Value Uncertainty: Medium
With the addition of smaller competitor Biomet, Zimmer is the undisputed king of large joint reconstruction, by far. We expect favorable demographics, which include aging baby boomers and rising obesity, to fuel solid demand for large-joint replacement that should offset price declines. However, Zimmer stumbled into a series of pitfalls in 2016-17, including integration issues, supply and inventory challenges, and quality concerns that have caught the attention of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. But new management has tackled these issues, and the firm is poised to ramp up its growth.
Damien Conover does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.