These 3 Network Security Stocks Get a Moat Upgrade
We think their excess returns on invested capital will endure, thanks in part to switching costs.
We think their excess returns on invested capital will endure, thanks in part to switching costs.
We have upgraded our economic moat ratings for Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP), Fortinet (FTNT), and Palo Alto Networks (PANW) to wide from narrow. For our moat trend ratings, we maintained Palo Alto at positive, adjusted Fortinet to positive from stable, and kept Check Point at stable. The moat rating upgrades drove fair value estimate increases as well: to $137 per share from $132 for Check Point, to $285 per share from $250 for Fortinet, and to $585 per share from $550 for Palo Alto.
These three network security companies have established prolific customer switching costs and network effects, helping drive solid records of excess economic returns on invested capital that we expect to endure.
Cybersecurity is not a winner-take-all market, but we do believe that certain subsegments will have a few dominant players. To us, this means that vendors can establish moats in various subsegments of the $130 billion cybersecurity market, and certain segments like network security (which includes firewall and demands about 20%-25% of security product budgets) can have multiple companies with wide moats. We believe that the network security market will continue consolidating around Check Point, Fortinet, and Palo Alto and that these companies will continue expanding outside their core solutions to gain further spending.
Changing security vendors today is more challenging than it was a decade ago because of the integration of features covering various security aspects, in our view. These three leading cybersecurity companies have built out security platforms containing their core firewall security products plus tangential solutions. The buying pattern of cybersecurity has shifted away from point-based security solutions, which has led to security toolset sprawl within organizations, and toward fewer key vendors that cover particular pieces of security. Based on various industry reports, we estimate enterprises maintain 60-80 different security solutions but want to condense that to 15-20 key vendors. We think Check Point, Fortinet, and Palo Alto have leading platforms that will keep customers locked into their ecosystem for the long haul.
The positive moat trend ratings for Fortinet and Palo Alto come from those companies’ larger, stickier deals being landed with strongly growing customer bases--and those deals can include various products per deal. These companies are also gaining momentum in areas outside their core network security offerings, such as cloud security, automating security responses, and software-defined networking. We believe the two positive-trend companies are making customers more reliant upon their solutions and further locking clients into their ecosystems.
With regard to Check Point’s stable trend, we believe the company has a large, loyal customer base that relies upon its sticky products, but its conservative approach to investing in development and sales and marketing efforts has caused leading competitors to make inroads into the broader security landscape. Nonetheless, we believe these three network security vendors will remain leaders and are essential to daily operations for organizations.
Mark Cash does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.