Skip to Content
Our Picks

The Problem with P/E Multiples

Why this common metric isn't that useful for finding investment value.

We often get correspondence from our subscribers that discusses stocks in terms of a price/earnings (P/E) multiple--especially our higher-rated stocks that trade at high multiples. The letters usually go something like this: "I see you have a 5-star rating on stock XYZ. How can this company be a buy at a P/E multiple of 40 when the market trades at a P/E multiple of 20?"

The reality is that the P/E multiple is just a shortcut method for valuation, and a pretty bad shortcut at that. There are quite a few problems with P/E-based valuations.

  • Trailing vs. forward P/E confusion--Not all P/E multiples are created equal, and one has to be careful to compare apples to apples. Trailing P/E is calculated based on the trailing 12-month earnings, while forward P/E is based on notoriously optimistic Wall Street estimates--and they are just that, estimates.
  • Short-term errors in earnings--Earnings include a whole lot of accounting estimation and opinion, allowing for manipulation or just plain error. Over short time horizons, temporary effects on earnings can generate a large error in trailing P/E. As an extreme example, Global Crossing  recently traded at a P/E of 0.029 based on 2003 earnings because of $24.9 billion of "earnings" resulting from a write-down of liabilities.
  • Earnings volatility--Earnings of many companies are volatile, rising and falling dramatically with the economy or other factors. This makes the denominator of the multiple volatile, producing high P/Es during times of depressed earnings.
  • Debt--a company with more debt in its capital structure will generally have higher returns on equity, but the earnings volatility will be greater. All else being equal, volatile earnings should be worth less, so a more leveraged company should trade at a lower P/E.
  • Growth--A more quickly growing company will typically be valued at a higher P/E multiple because rapidly growing cash flow is worth more than slowly growing cash flow. Some investors try to compensate for this by using a PEG ratio (P/E divided by growth rate) and use a PEG of 1 as a benchmark. But even with this adjustment, the PEG ratio isn't a good basis for comparison across companies because it doesn't include information about how long the company will be growing at that high rate.

Let's focus on the problems of using a P/E on a rapidly growing company. A great historical case where a P/E-based valuation would have led you astray is  Home Depot (HD). The table below contains some of the metrics we've been discussing for the period 1990 to 2003. We calculated both the cumulative return had an investor held the stock to 2003, as well as the return over a five-year holding period.

 Home Depot Metrics
YearPrice*
( $ )
Earnings
( $ Mil )
Earnings
Growth
( % )
P/E RatioPEG Ratio

Return to
2003
( % )

5-Year
Return
( % )

19902.8816346310.72130
19917.4824651601.2148
199211.236347661.41112
19938.7845726401.51536
199410.260532371.11546
199510.673221321.51634
199611.193828281.01836
199719.61,16024381.6104
199840.71,61439621.6-3-3
199968.62,32044731.7-15N/A
200045.72,58111393.5-8N/A
200151.03,04418432.4-17N/A
200224.03,66420150.848N/A
200335.5N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
* Data as of year-end date each year.

In 1990, Home Depot was a bargain at a trailing P/E of 31. If you'd bought Home Depot in 1990 and held it to the end of 2003, your average annual return would have been 21% over that time period. In fact, in 1991, it was approximately fairly priced at a trailing P/E of 60, with a return to the end of 2003 of 13% per year.

One great example of a stock with similar characteristics today is  CarMax (KMX). CarMax is trading at a trailing P/E multiple of about 32 times earnings--and we think it is a bargain at this price. Because CarMax is a great business and will continue to increase earnings for many years, our discounted cash-flow model values the company at $58, or a trailing P/E of about 54. The price of the company on Mr. Market's voting machine may not rise today, next week, or next month. But we think the success of the company will drive up the earnings and cash flows for many years to come, and eventually all that cash will start to pile up on Mr. Market's weighing machine. When Mr. Market looks at the scale, his greed will take over and the stock price will reflect the value of all of that cash.

We ran a screen Morningstar.com's  Premium Stock Screener to search for other stocks that we think are good values despite high P/E multiples. We selected companies with a trailing P/E above 30 that we rate 4 or 5 stars. The examples below are other stocks like CarMax--stocks we like for their long-term growth potential.

 CH Robinson Worldwide  (CHRW)
Morningstar Rating: 4 Stars
Business Risk: Average
From the  Analyst Report: "Our valuation assumptions include a return to healthier growth in net revenue (a logistics industry term for gross profit), averaging 14% over the next five years."

 Iron Mountain  (IRM)
Morningstar Rating: 5 Stars
Business Risk: Below Average
From the  Analyst Report: "We assume the company will see 8.5% internal revenue growth (consistent with the past five years) through 2007, improving the gross margin to 55%."

 Medtronic (MDT)
Morningstar Rating: 4 Stars
Business Risk: Below Average
From the  Analyst Report: "We assume heart-device sales growth will settle into the high teens, while sales growth of diabetes, neurological, and spinal products should stay in the midteens to high 20s."

 Paychex  (PAYX)
Morningstar Rating: 5 Stars
Business Risk: Below Average
From the  Analyst Report: "Our sales growth forecast averages 14% and our margins expand from about 36.5% in 2003 to 42.3% in 2008. We believe these assumptions are aggressive but attainable."

Click  here to run this screen yourself. Note: The stocks mentioned above passed our screen as of March 12. The results of the screen may change due to daily price fluctuations or other factors. After clicking, you can save the search to use later by clicking the "Save Criteria" button in the bottom right-hand corner of the screen. (You will need to be logged in as a Premium Member to view and save the complete screen.)

Sponsor Center