Skip to Content
Our Picks

21 Standout Companies Run by Women

These firms have carved out economic moats and are led by female CEOs.

Mentioned: , , , ,

Editor's note: This article is part of our Women and Investing special report.

ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood (and her hot investing hand) has become a financial media favorite this year--and investors seem equally impressed: Her ARK family of funds is raking in oodles of money, in some instances to the tune of $1 billion per day. Similarly, Bumble (BMBL) founder Whitney Wolfe Heard made headlines this year as the youngest female CEO to take a company public in the United States.

Don't let these headline makers fool you, though: Women still hold a disproportionately small number of CEO roles among U.S. companies. How small? Only 6% of CEO positions were held by females in 2019, according to recent research.

Of course, buying a stock simply because the company's CEO is a woman doesn't make any more investment sense than buying a stock simply because the company's CEO is a man. Instead, you want to examine fundamentals, consider valuation, and apply whatever other investment metrics matter to you before buying. Moreover, CEOs come and go. That female-led company may be managed by a man---and vice versa--soon enough.

But given that International Women's Day is right around the corner, today we're looking at woman-led companies through the lens of economic moats: We're sharing some companies that our analysts follow with Morningstar Economic Moat Ratings of wide and narrow that have women at the helm. These firms have all carved out competitive advantages that should allow them to thrive for the next decade or more.

Here's a closer look at three of the stocks from the list.

Anthem (ANTM)
"Anthem continues to capitalize on its enviable position as the exclusive licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield brand in 14 states. We would argue that the Blue Cross Blue Shield brand is the most recognizable and trusted franchise in the U.S. health insurance industry. As the largest Blue Cross Blue Shield operator, Anthem (42.9 million at the end of 2020) nearly covers as many medical members as industry leader UnitedHealth (UNH) (43.0 million). Anthem's position is particularly impressive given its limited geographic reach compared with UnitedHealth's national network. Specifically, Anthem's market share dives deep in its license states where it claims average membership share of around 35%. This high local market share remains particularly valuable in health insurance since medical care providers typically only operate in limited geographic areas, making local market share the most relevant to most reimbursement negotiations.

"With its substantial local and national market share, Anthem aims to deepen its influence on both the provider and client front. Specifically on the provider front, Anthem uses its deep local market share to align incentives through value-based and risk-sharing relationships that appear significantly above the industry average. We believe alignment like this between payers and providers could help rein in healthcare cost trends in the U.S., which should benefit clients and end users alike. On the client front, Anthem's launch of its IngenioRx pharmacy benefit management platform should help it provide a more holistic view of a patient's health, which could lead to better cost controls and management of health conditions. Anthem aims to roll out this service to existing clients and expand its reach with other Blue Cross Blue Shield systems in particular.

"With strategic initiatives like these, Anthem seeks to accelerate its growth in the long run. Specifically, management is targeting 10%-12% annualized revenue growth and 12%-15% adjusted earnings per share in its core business. While its near-term outlook may be constrained by COVID-19 and policy challenges, we still project low-double-digit earnings growth annualized through 2025."

--Julie Utterback, senior analyst

Duke Energy (DUK)
"Duke Energy is one of the largest regulated utilities by market cap in the United States. Florida is Duke's most constructive and attractive jurisdiction, with higher-than-average load growth and best-in-class regulation that allows for higher-than-average returns on equity, forward-looking rates, and automatic base-rate adjustments. We expect significant solar growth in the region, and new legislation offers a long runway of storm-hardening investments.

"In North Carolina, Duke's largest service territory, we view the regulatory framework as average and continue to expect Duke will receive support for its investments in the state. In early 2021, Duke entered into a settlement that if approved would resolve historical recovery of coal ash costs and provide clarity on future recovery. We view the settlement favorably, as it addresses the treatment of significant required investment over the next decade. We also think the settlement, if approved, provides a positive indicator that the regulatory environment in North Carolina will remain constructive, which is key given the importance of the Carolinas to Duke's financial outlook.

"South Carolina has taken a tougher stance with utilities. A less constructive regulatory environment could lead management to direct capital investment to its other utilities. South Carolina represents just 12% of total rate base, with fewer growth opportunities than Duke's other regulated subsidiaries.

"Indiana remains constructive. Regulators approved a peer-average allowed return on equity. The subsidiary is allowed recovery for investments for renewable energy and recovery on and of investments for coal ash remediation. Management recently entered into an agreement to sell 19.9% of the entity at an attractive valuation.

"Duke's updated $60 billion, five-year capital investment plan is focused on clean energy as the company works toward net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and net-zero methane emissions by 2030. Management recently gave us a first look into growth opportunities beyond 2024, noting expectations for $65 billion to $75 billion of capital expenditures, supporting 7% annual rate base growth from 2024-29."

--Andrew Bischof, senior analyst 

Nasdaq (NDAQ)
"Nasdaq is adeptly making the transition from being solely an equity exchange to a diversified data and technology company. Although Nasdaq's market services, or traditional trading, business accounts for less than 40% of net revenue, the firm is benefiting from higher transaction-based revenue. The market services business received a nice bump in revenue in 2020 from higher market volatility and changes in retail investor behavior because of COVID-19, which we expect will partially revert in the following quarters. The market services business remains a key part of Nasdaq's overall business, as it is the foundation for much of the company's other segments: information services, market technology, and corporate services.

"Nasdaq's management team has fairly high hopes for the information services and market technology segments, with expected revenue growth over the medium term of 5% to 7% in information services and 13% to 16% for market technology after the acquisition of Verafin. These "solutions" segments are more stable sources of revenue for Nasdaq and have high predicted growth rates. Nasdaq is successfully shifting its business mix into more data and technology, and the market has recently been rewarding the company for it.

"We believe that the company's pivot in recent years under CEO Adena Friedman has been beneficial. The cash equities and equity options that are the bulk of Nasdaq's market services business are competitive, and new competitors have emerged in recent years. There's also been some pushback from clients and regulators regarding the pricing of data products. The movement into areas with large addressable markets, such as financial compliance services, and those that are exposed to secular tailwinds, such as indexes and ESG, could provide a fairly exciting revenue growth story for the company."

--Michael Wong, director 

Susan Dziubinski does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.