Brighter Outlook for Bank Technology Providers
We're still ambivalent about recent M&A, though.
We're still ambivalent about recent M&A, though.
We have boosted our long-term growth and margin assumptions for the three bank technology providers we cover. As a result, our fair value estimates have increased to $131 per share from $98 for Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), to $108 per share from $89 for Fiserv (FISV), and to $149 per share from $131 for Jack Henry (JKHY). Additionally, we have changed our fair value uncertainty rating for Fidelity National to medium from high and raised our stewardship rating for the company to Standard from Poor. We are maintaining our wide moat rating for Jack Henry and narrow moat ratings for Fidelity National and Fiserv. We believe providing core processing and complementary services remains a wide-moat activity, given extremely high switching costs, but mergers and acquisitions have diluted Fidelity National’s and Fiserv’s businesses to a point where a narrow moat rating is more appropriate.
Currently, we see Fidelity National and Jack Henry as modestly overvalued, while Fiserv trades at a slight discount and looks to be the best relative value. Following Fiserv’s merger with First Data last year, the acquiring business is no longer laboring under a heavy debt load. With these financial health concerns removed, we think the company has room to increase investment in the business and start to close the growth gap with its peers. While First Data remains relatively reliant on its banking partners, initiatives such as Clover (a cloud-based point-of-sale platform) suggest it is capable of adjusting to a changing industry. Clover’s small-business solution is similar to Square’s offering and has seen strong growth, with volume at an annualized run rate of $90 billion. This is a drop in the bucket relative to overall volume, but Clover enjoys much stronger pricing and is the type of platform that we think the company needs to move its growth rate more in line with the rest of the industry.
We remain ambivalent about the recent mergers that added acquiring operations for Fidelity National and Fiserv. The COVID-19 pandemic illustrates one of the main negatives of these mergers--the acquiring businesses are now significantly more macro-sensitive than they were when they were more heavily weighted toward their legacy bank technology operations. However, recent results suggest that payment volume has steadily improved from its April lows and is returning to positive year-over-year growth. Unless the recovery from the pandemic takes a sharp negative turn, the long-term secular tailwind appears to be reasserting itself with the worst of the crisis seeming to be past the industry. In the long run, we believe the secular tailwind for electronic payments should boost overall growth for Fidelity National and Fiserv.
Jack Henry is a smaller player and sat out the recent wave of mergers, but we believe its patient approach to growth has bolstered its moat. Fiserv and Fidelity National are essentially roll-ups, and while building a leading position through M&A in an attractive industry is not a negative, it has left these companies with multiple acquired platforms that they must maintain, or risk voiding their switching cost advantages. In contrast, Jack Henry has grown organically and utilized acquisitions only sparingly. As a result, it has built unified platforms for banks and credit unions. Its slimmed-down product set allows it to focus its resources and maintain operating margins on par with its larger peers, and historical results suggest that Jack Henry has increased its share over time.
Brett Horn does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.