Skip to Content

New ETFs Give Fixed-Income Investors Cheaper Options

We examine the 18 new entrants.

Mentioned: , , , , , , ,

The growing number of bond exchange-traded funds launched in 2020 has made it easier for investors to find cheaper fixed-income funds--both actively managed and index-tracking strategies. This year’s crop of 18 new bond ETFs continues the trend of recent years for an increased number of bond strategies available in an exchange-traded wrapper. Offerings since 2018 include bond ETFs from Vanguard, Pimco, and Fidelity.

These newer funds have increased fee competition in most bond categories--good news for investors. Of the fixed-income funds that are among the cheapest 10% of their respective Morningstar Categories, 40% were launched in the past four years.

Seven of the 18 fixed-income ETFs launched this year are actively managed strategies. While expenses on these funds are slightly higher than the average ETF, they are still lower than what investors pay for actively managed open-end funds. 

Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) is one of the actively managed ETFs launched this year; the $137.5 million fund carries an expense ratio of 0.29%, below the average intermediate core bond fee of 0.53%. The fund is one of three intermediate core bond funds launched this year, which is already home to the largest number of passive fixed-income funds. Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) launched in April, and its 0.14% expense ratio puts it in the cheapest 10% of funds in the intermediate core bond category. 

Low-Cost Bond ETFs With High Morningstar Quantitative Ratings 
Which of the low-cost funds rank the highest by Morningstar’s quantitative metrics? Newer funds typically aren’t reviewed immediately by Morningstar’s analysts, so we used the forward-looking Morningstar Quantitative Rating to pick out the highest rated funds launched in the past two years. 

Multiple funds with Gold and Silver Morningstar Quantitative Ratings have opened their doors in the high-yield category. BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) launched in April, and its 0.22% expense ratio is 0.6 percentage points lower than the median expense ratio for high-yield funds of 0.86%. Another high-yield fund, PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL), carries a below-median expense ratio of 0.53%. 

In the ultrashort category, three funds launched in the past three years that received Gold or Silver quantitative ratings. Pimco Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) carries an expense ratio of 0.24% and invests in short-term fixed-income securities with a concentration on socially conscious companies. The fund was added to the Morningstar Prospects list by our Manager Research analysts in July. Fidelity also offers a cheap ultrashort fund--Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 13 percentage points lower than the median fund in the category with an expense ratio of 0.15%.

The best deal out of the new ETFs may be the Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW), launched in 2018. BNDW carries an expense ratio of 0.06% and offers exposure to world bond funds at a significantly lower cost than other funds in the category. (The median world bond expense ratio is 0.76%.)

JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) offers a low-cost option in a typically more expensive category. With fees of 0.39%, JPMB lands well below the median expense ratio for all emerging-markets bonds at 0.93%. 

Katherine Lynch does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.