|• FORM 10-Q • EX-31.1 • EX-31.2 • EX-32 • XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-14549
United Security Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). In addition, United Security Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or USBI), through its senior management, from time to time makes forward-looking statements concerning its expected future operations and performance and other developments. The words estimate, project, intend, anticipate, expect, believe and similar expressions are indicative of forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates reflecting the Companys best judgment based upon current information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and various factors could cause results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors could include those identified from time to time in the Companys Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and other public announcements, including the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. With respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for the Company, these factors include, but are not limited to, the rate of growth (or lack thereof) in the economy, the relative strength and weakness in the consumer and commercial credit sectors and in the real estate markets and collateral values. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the dates on which the forward-looking statements are made, except as required by law.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United Security Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or USBI). The Company is the parent holding company of First United Security Bank (the Bank or FUSB). The Bank operates a finance company, Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. (ALC). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. While certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), management believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the condensed consolidated information presented not misleading. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. In preparing the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, management evaluated subsequent events through the date on which the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The standards set forth in ASU 2011-04 supersede most of the accounting guidance currently found in Topic 820 of FASBs Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) and previously known as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments will improve comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments also clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. These amendments include (1) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, (2) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entitys shareholders equity and (3) disclosing quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used within the Level 3 hierarchy. This ASU became effective for the Companys interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 5 for the newly-required disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends existing standards to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under both options, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income; each component
of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income; and a total amount for comprehensive income. Any changes pursuant to the options allowed in the amendments should be applied retrospectively. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this new guidance with first quarter 2012 financial reporting. In January 2012, the FASB issued accounting guidance that indefinitely defers the effective date of certain provisions concerning the presentation of comprehensive income. The guidance indefinitely defers the requirement to present reclassification adjustments by component in both the statement where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. See the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for further details.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11 Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this Update affect all entities that have financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The requirements amend the disclosure requirements on offsetting in ASC 210-20-50. This information will enable users of an entitys financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entitys financial position, including the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with certain financial instruments and derivative instruments in the scope of this Update. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Basic net income attributable to USBI per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to USBI by the weighted average shares during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Diluted net income attributable to USBI per share for each of the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is computed based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of all potentially dilutive instruments outstanding. There were no outstanding potentially dilutive instruments during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 or 2011, and, therefore, basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were the same.
The following table represents the basic and diluted net income attributable to USBI per share calculations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Comprehensive income consists of net income attributable to USBI and the change in the unrealized gains or losses on the Companys available-for-sale securities portfolio arising during the period. In the calculation of comprehensive income, certain reclassification adjustments are made to avoid double counting items that are displayed as part of net income for a period that also had been displayed as part of other comprehensive income in that period or earlier periods.
The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC Topic 820 requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the consolidated statements of financial condition, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The assumptions used in the estimation of the fair value of the Companys financial instruments are detailed below. Where quoted prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flows and other valuation techniques. The use of discounted cash flows can be significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. The following disclosures should not be considered a surrogate of the liquidation value of the Company, but rather represent a good-faith estimate of the increase or decrease in value of financial instruments held by the Company since purchase, origination or issuance.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods, including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash, due from banks and federal funds sold: The carrying amount of cash, due from banks and federal funds sold approximates fair value.
Federal Home Loan Bank: Based on the redemption provision of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), the stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost.
Securities: Fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on market prices of comparable instruments.
Accrued interest: The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates fair value.
Loans, net: For variable-rate loans, fair values are based on carrying values. Fixed-rate commercial loans, other installment loans and certain real estate mortgage loans were valued using discounted cash flows. The discount rate used to determine the present value of these loans is based on interest rates currently being charged by the Company on comparable loans as to credit risk and term.
Demand and savings deposits: The fair values of demand deposits are equal to the carrying value of such deposits. Demand deposits include non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and money market demand accounts.
Time deposits: The fair values of relatively short-term time deposits are equal to their carrying values. Discounted cash flows are used to value long-term time deposits. The discount rate used is based on interest rates currently being offered by the Company on comparable deposits as to amount and term.
Short-term borrowings: These borrowings may consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and the floating rate borrowings from the FHLB. Due to the short-term nature of these borrowings, fair values approximate carrying values.
Long-term debt: The fair value of this debt is estimated using discounted cash flows based on the Companys current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Off-balance sheet instruments: The carrying amount of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit approximates fair value. The carrying amount of the off-balance sheet financial instruments is based on fees currently charged to enter into such agreements.
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized below.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. Level 2 securities include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. Level 2 fair
values are obtained from quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. In certain cases, where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Currently, all of the Companys available-for-sale securities are considered to be Level 2 securities, except for $10,313 and $10,284 for June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, in equity securities that are considered to be Level 1 securities.
Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company is required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including impaired loans. Loan impairment is reported when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans existing rate or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. Loans, net of specific allowances, subject to this evaluation amounted to $16,052,303 and $16,245,779 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. This valuation would be considered Level 3, consisting of appraisals of underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analysis.
Non-Financial Assets and Non-Financial Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The Company has no non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include foreclosed assets (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test and intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.
During 2012, certain foreclosed assets, upon initial recognition, were remeasured and reported at fair value through a charge-off to the allowance for loan losses based upon the fair value of the foreclosed asset. The fair value of a foreclosed asset, upon initial recognition, is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on observable market data or Level 3 inputs based on customized discounting criteria. Foreclosed assets measured at fair value upon initial recognition totaled $302,740 and $5,115,994, (utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs) for the periods ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. In connection with the measurement and initial recognition of the foregoing foreclosed assets, the Company recognized charge-offs of the allowance for possible loan losses totaling approximately $238,929 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $2,514,983 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Foreclosed assets totaling $8,525,171 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and $14,157,679 for the year ended December 31, 2011, were remeasured at fair value, resulting in impairment loss of $2,863,446 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $6,389,774 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The following table presents detailed information regarding assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2012. The table includes the valuation techniques and the significant unobservable inputs utilized. The range of each unobservable input as well as the weighted average within the range utilized at June 30, 2012 is included. Following the table is a description of the valuation technique and the sensitivity of the technique to changes in the significant unobservable input.
NON-RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
Impaired loans are valued based on multiple data points indicating the fair value for each loan. The primary data point for non-performing loans is the appraisal value of the underlying collateral to which a discount is applied. Management establishes this discount or comparability adjustment based on recent sales of similar property types. As liquidity in the market increases or decreases, the comparability adjustment and the resulting asset valuation are impacted.
Foreclosed property and other real estate
Foreclosed property and other real estate under contract for sale are valued based on contract price. If no sales contract is pending for a specific property, management establishes a comparability adjustment to the appraised value based on historical activity considering proceeds for properties sold versus the corresponding appraised value. Increases or decreases in realization for properties sold impact the comparability adjustment for similar assets remaining on the balance sheet.
The estimated fair value and related carrying or notional amounts of the Companys financial instruments at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:
Details of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
The scheduled maturities of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at June 30, 2012 are presented in the following table:
For purposes of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the weighted-average contractual maturities of underlying collateral. The mortgage-backed securities generally mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.
The following table reflects the Companys investments gross unrealized losses and market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment no less frequently than quarterly and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) whether the Company does not intend to sell these securities, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, based on the aforementioned considerations, management did not record other-than-temporary impairment on any security that was in an unrealized loss position.
As of June 30, 2012, six debt securities had been in a loss position for more than twelve months, and five debt securities had been in a loss position for less than twelve months. The losses for all securities are considered to be a direct result of the effect that the current interest rate environment has on the value of debt securities and not related to the creditworthiness of the issuers. Further, the Company has the current intent and ability to retain its investments in the issuers for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Therefore, the Company has not recognized any other-than-temporary impairments.
Investment securities available-for-sale with a carrying amount of $72.1 million and $80.0 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for FHLB advances.
The following chart represents the gross gains and losses realized on securities:
The Company has limited partnership investments in affordable housing projects for which it provides funding as a limited partner and receives tax credits related to its investments in the projects based on its partnership share. The Company has invested in limited partnerships of affordable housing projects as investments in funds that invest solely in affordable housing projects. The Company has determined that these structures require valuation as a variable interest entity (VIE) under ASC Topic 810 Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. The Company consolidates one of the funds in which it has a 99.9% limited partnership interest. The resulting financial impact to the Company of the consolidation was a net increase to total assets of approximately $148,510 as of June 30, 2012 and $150,000 as of December 31, 2011. The remaining limited partnership investments are unconsolidated and are accounted for under the cost method as allowed under ASC Topic 325 Accounting for Tax Benefits Resulting from Investments in Affordable Housing Projects. The Company amortizes the excess of carrying value of the investment over its estimated residual value during the period in which tax credits are allocated to the investors. The Companys maximum exposure to future loss related to these limited partnerships is limited to the $1.4 million recorded investment.
The assets and liabilities of these partnerships consist primarily of apartment complexes and related mortgages. The Banks carrying value approximates cost or its underlying equity in the net assets of the partnerships. Market quotations are not available for any of the aforementioned partnerships. Management has no knowledge of intervening events since the date of the partnerships financial statements that would have had a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Bank had no remaining cash commitments to these partnerships at June 30, 2012.
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the composition of the loan portfolio by reporting segment and portfolio segment was as follows:
The Company grants commercial, real estate and installment loans to its customers. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, 72.7% of the portfolio is concentrated in loans secured by real estate.
The Company has divided the loan portfolio into eight portfolio segments, each with different risk characteristics and methodologies for assessing the risk described as follows:
Construction, land development and other land loans Commercial construction, land and land development loans include the development of residential housing projects, loans for the development of commercial and industrial use property and loans for the purchase and improvement of raw land. These loans are secured in whole or in part by the underlying real estate collateral and are generally guaranteed by the principals of the borrower.
Secured by 1-4 residential properties These loans include conventional mortgage loans on one-to-four family residential properties. These properties may serve as the borrowers primary resident, vacation home or investment property. Also included in this portfolio are home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrowers residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home.
Secured by multi-family residential properties These are mortgage loans secured by apartment buildings.
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties Commercial real estate loans include loans secured by commercial and industrial properties, office or mixed-use facilities, strip shopping centers or other commercial property. These loans are generally guaranteed by the principals of the borrower.
Other real estate loans Other real estate loans are loans primarily for agricultural production, secured by mortgages on farm land.
Commercial and industrial loans Includes loans to commercial customers for use in normal business to finance working projects. These credits may be loans and lines to financially strong borrowers, secured by inventories, equipment or receivables, and are generally guaranteed by the principals of the borrower.
Consumer loans Includes a variety of secured and unsecured personal loans, including automobile loans, loans for household and personal purpose and all other direct consumer installment loans.
Other loans Other loans comprise overdrawn checking accounts reclassified to loans and overdraft lines of credit.
Related Party Loans
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank makes loans to certain officers and directors of the Company, the Bank and ALC, including companies with which they are associated. These loans are made on the same terms as those prevailing for comparable transactions with others. Such loans do not represent more than normal risk of collectibility, nor do they present other unfavorable features. The amounts of such related party loans and commitments at June 30, 2012, December 31, 2011and June 30, 2011 were $2,711,659, $3,036,740 and $2,450,038, respectively. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, new loans to these parties totaled $53,283, and repayments by active related parties were $372,984. Director Dan Barlow retired from the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank in May of 2012; his loan totaling $5,380 was eliminated from the June 30, 2012 balance. During the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2011, new loans to these parties totaled $1,301,901, and repayments were $426,665. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, new loans to these parties totaled $449,601, and repayments were $138,093.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Changes in the allowance for loan losses by reporting segment and portfolio segment were as follows:
Impaired Loan Evaluations
The following table details loans individually evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
The following table details loans collectively evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
Credit Quality Indicators
The Bank has established a credit risk rating system to assess and manage the risk in the loan portfolio. It establishes a uniform framework and common language for assessing and monitoring risk in the portfolio.
The following is a guide for an 8-grade system of credit risk:
Included in Special Mention assets could be workout or turnaround situations, as well as those borrowers previously rated 2-4 who have shown deterioration, for whatever reason, indicating a downgrading from the better grade. The Special Mention rating is designed to identify a specific level of risk and concern about a loans and/or borrowers quality. Although a Special Mention asset has a higher probability of default than previously rated categories, its default is not imminent.
The table below illustrates the carrying amount of loans by credit quality indicator at June 30, 2012.
The table below illustrates the carrying amount of loans by credit quality indicator at December 31, 2011.
The following table provides an aging analysis of past due loans and nonaccruing loans by class at June 30, 2012.
The following table provides an aging analysis of past due loans and nonaccruing loans by class at December 31, 2011.
At June 30, 2012, the carrying amount of impaired loans consisted of the following:
At December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of impaired loans consisted of the following:
The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:
Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued amounted to $17,532,838 and $16,502,314 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. If interest on those loans had been accrued, such income would have approximated $713,200 and $1,459,843 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, respectively. Interest income actually recorded on those loans amounted to $12,211 and $35,519 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, respectively. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more amounted to $1,660,876 and $2,331,718 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, respectively.
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Loans are considered restructured loans if concessions have been granted to borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions granted generally involve the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment schedule or interest rate, which generally would not otherwise be considered. Restructured loans can involve loans remaining on nonaccrual, moving to nonaccrual or continuing on accrual status, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. Nonaccrual restructured loans are included and treated with all other nonaccrual loans. In addition, all accruing restructured loans are being reported as troubled debt restructurings. Generally, restructured loans remain on nonaccrual until the customer has attained a sustained period of repayment performance under the modified loan terms (generally a minimum of six months). However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and whether the loan should be returned to or maintained on nonaccrual status. If the borrowers ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains on nonaccrual. Based on the above, the Company had $1,844,536 and $1,821,696 of non-accruing loans that were restructured and remained on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company had $1,735,471 and $2,488,060 of restructured loans that were restored to accrual status based on a sustained period of repayment performance at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
The following table provides the number of loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring by loan portfolio during the periods ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, as well as the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Restructured loan modifications may include payment schedule modifications, interest rate concessions, maturity date extensions, modification of note structure, principal reduction or some combination of these concessions. During the periods ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, restructured loan modifications of loans secured by real estate, commercial and industrial loans primarily included maturity date extensions and payment schedule modifications.
The change in troubled debt restructuring as of June 30, 2012 was as follows:
All loans $500,000 and over modified in a troubled debt restructuring are evaluated for impairment. The nature and extent of impairment of restructured loans, including those that have experienced a subsequent payment default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses. This evaluation resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $865,434 and $494,352 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Short-term borrowings consist of federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements. Federal funds purchased generally mature within one to four days. There were no federal funds purchased outstanding at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011. There were no treasury tax and loan deposits outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements, which are secured borrowings, generally are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The Company may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. The Company monitors the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. Securities sold under repurchase agreements at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $714,355 and $355,787, respectively.
At June 30, 2012, the Bank had $7.8 million in available federal fund lines from correspondent banks.
The Company uses FHLB advances as an alternative to funding sources with similar maturities, such as certificates of deposit or other deposit programs. These advances generally offer more attractive rates when compared to other mid-term financing options. They are also flexible, allowing the Company to quickly obtain the necessary maturities and rates that best suit its overall asset/liability strategy. At June 30, 2012, there were no advances outstanding and no investment securities or mortgage loans pledged to secure these borrowings. At December 31, 2011, investment securities and mortgage loans amounting to $22.6 million were pledged to secure these borrowings in the amount of $20.0 million.
At June 30, 2012, the Bank had $181.0 million in available credit from the FHLB.
The Company files a consolidated income tax return with the federal government and the state of Alabama. ALC files a Mississippi state income tax return on its Mississippi branches. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and the states in which it files for the years ended December 31, 2008 though 2011.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits related to Federal or state income tax matters and does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits relative to any tax positions taken prior to June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had accrued no interest and no penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The consolidated tax provision differed from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 34.0%, as described in the following table:
Under ASC Topic 280 Segment Reporting, certain information is disclosed for the two reportable operating segments of the Company. The reportable segments were determined using the internal management reporting system. These segments are composed of the Companys and the Banks significant subsidiaries. The accounting policies for each segment are the same as those described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011. The segment results include certain overhead allocations and intercompany transactions that were recorded at current market prices. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated to determine the consolidated balances. The results for the two reportable segments of the Company are included in the following table: