| • QUARTERLY REPORT • CERTIFICATION • CERTIFICATION • CERTIFICATION • CERTIFICATION • EX-101.INS • EX-101.SCH • EX-101.CAL • EX-101.DEF • EX-101.LAB • EX-101.PRE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.20549
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012
Commission file number: 0-7914
![]() (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Check whether the issuer is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Shares of common stock outstanding on August 10, 2012: 1,706,756
EARTHSTONE ENERGY, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Current Report on Form 10-Q, including information incorporated herein by reference, contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs, assumptions and information currently available to management. The use of any statements containing the words "anticipate," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," "predict," "plan," "should," "likely," "may," "will," "continue" or similar expressions are intended to identify such statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts that address activities that we anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things:
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others, such things as:
Furthermore, forward-looking statements are made based on our current assessment available at the time. Subsequently obtained information concerning the merits of any property, as well as changes in estimated exploration and development costs and ownership interest, may result in revisions to our expectations and intentions and, thus, we may alter our plans regarding any exploration and development activities.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, those expectations may prove to be incorrect. As with comparable companies within our industry, there are numerous factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances.
3
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Page 1 of 2
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Earthstone Energy, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Page 2 of 2
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
30-Jun-12
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim financial statements of Earthstone Energy, Inc. (formerly Basic Earth Science Systems, Inc.) are unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes any applicable adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial and operational results for the interim period according to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
At the directive of the Securities and Exchange Commission to use “plain English” in public filings, the Company will use such terms as “we,” “our,” “us” or “the Company” in place of Earthstone Energy, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary. When such terms are used in this manner throughout the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, they are in reference only to the corporation, Earthstone Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and are not used in reference to the Board of Directors, corporate officers, management, or any individual employee or group of employees.
The financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. We believe the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading and suggest that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the previous fiscal year-end.
Further, the results of operations for the three months covered by this report, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the year.
Fair Value Measurements. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables and accrued liabilities, all of which are considered to be representative of their fair market value, due to the short-term and highly liquid nature of these instruments.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions concern matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions are revised periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period it is determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU requires the Company to disclose both net and gross information about assets and liabilities that have been offset, if any, and the related arrangements. The disclosures under this new guidance are required to be provided retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Company is required to implement this guidance effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
2. Other Assets
8
3. Accrued Liabilities
4. Income Tax
A reconciliation between the income tax provision at the statutory rate on income tax and the income tax provision for the three months ended is as follows:
The overall effective tax rate expressed as a percentage of book income before income tax for the three month period, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was lower due primarily to lower pre-tax income and increased capital expenditures compared to the comparable period.
9
Projections of future income taxes and their timing require significant estimates with respect to future operating results. Accordingly, deferred taxes may change significantly as more information and data is gathered with respect to such events as changes in commodity prices, their effect on the estimate of oil and gas reserves and the depletion of these long-lived reserves.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and income tax from multiple state jurisdictions.
The Company's tax returns for the prior four tax years of filings are still subject to examination by tax authorities.
10
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, as well as the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and other information appearing in Item 1 of this report.
The preparation of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes including matters arising during the normal course of business. We apply our best judgment, our knowledge of existing facts and circumstances and our knowledge of actions that we may undertake in the future in determining the estimates that will affect our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis using our historical experience, as well as other factors we believe appropriate under the circumstances, such as current economic conditions, and adjust or revise our estimates as circumstances change. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results may differ from these estimates.
As used in this report, unless the context otherwise indicates, references to “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Earthstone Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary collectively.
As an oil and natural gas producer, our revenue, cash flow from operations, other income and profitability, reserve values, access to capital and future rate of growth are influenced by the prevailing prices of crude oil and natural gas. Changes in commodity prices affect, both positively and negatively, our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain financing and operating results. Changes in commodity prices may influence, both positively and negatively, the amount of crude oil and natural gas that we choose to produce. Prevailing prices for such commodities fluctuate in response to changes in supply and demand and a variety of additional factors beyond our control, such as global, political and economic conditions. Inherently, the prices received for crude oil and natural gas production are unpredictable, and such volatility is expected. Most of our production is sold at market prices. Obviously, if the commodity indexes fluctuate, the price that we receive for our production will fluctuate. Therefore, the amount of revenue that we realize, as well as our estimates of future revenues, is to a large extent determined by factors beyond our control.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity Outlook. Our primary source of funding is the net cash flow from the sale of our oil and natural gas production. The profitability and cash flow generated by our operations in any particular accounting period will be directly related to: (a) the volume of oil and gas produced and sold, (b) the average realized prices for oil and gas sold, and (c) lifting costs. At the current price of oil, we believe the cash generated from operations, along with existing cash balances, should enable us to meet our existing and normal recurring obligations during the next year and beyond.
Overviewof our Capital Structure. We recognize the importance of developing our capital resource base in order to pursue our objectives. However, subsequent to our last public offering in 1980, debt financing has been the sole source of external funding. In addition to our routine production-related costs, general and administrative expenses and, when necessary, debt repayment requirements, we require capital to fund our exploratory and development drilling efforts and the acquisition of additional properties as well as the enhancement of held and newly acquired properties.
We have received numerous inquiries regarding the possibility of funding our efforts through equity contributions or debt instruments. Given strong cash flows, and the relatively modest nature of our current drilling projects, we have thus far declined these overtures. Our primary concern in this area is the dilution of our existing shareholders. However, going forward, given that one of the key components of our growth strategy is to expand our oil and natural gas reserve base through drilling and/or acquisitions, if we were presented with a significant opportunity and available cash and bank debt financing were insufficient, it is possible we would consider alternative forms of additional financing.
11
Hedging. During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we did not participate in any hedging activities, nor did we have any open futures or option contracts.
Working Capital. At June 30, 2012, we had a working capital surplus of $4,389,000 (a current ratio of 2.29:1) compared to a working capital surplus at March 31, 2012 of $6,572,000 (a current ratio of 2.91:1).The decrease in current ratio is primarily a result of the use of cash for the acquisition, development and exploration of oil and gas properties.
Cash Flow. Cash used by operating activities was $42,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to cash provided by operating activities $349,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Changes in operating cash relate primarily to the decline in net income adjusted for non-cash expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period ended June 30, 2011. The fluctuation in deferred income tax expense, the timing and payment of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, especially pertaining to capital expenditure outlays, in addition to the timing and collection of accounts receivable and the application of prepaid balances were also factors in deriving net cash flows from operations.
Overall, net cash used in investing activities more than doubled for the three months ended June 30, 2012, at $2,150,000, from $851,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This was the result of an increase in the number of wells drilled and completed during the period compared to the same period in the prior year, in addition to spending on the acquisitions of oil and gas property, as explained in “Capital Expenditures” below.
No cash was used for financing activities in either of the three months ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.
Capital Expenditures
The amounts presented herein are presented on an accrual basis, and as such may not be consistent with the amounts presented on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows under investing activities for expenditures on oil and gas property, which are presented on a cash basis.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we spent $2,748,000 on various projects. This compares to $1,115,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, capital expenditures were comprised of drilling and completions of our wells (approximately 0.15 net) producing as of period end (8%), drilling of eighteen wells (approximately 0.65 net) to be completed as of calendar year end (74%), and leasehold (7%). The remaining 11% of costs were primarily dedicated to recompleting existing wells. The majority (97%) of capital expenditures were spent in the Williston basin. These projects were funded entirely with internally generated cash flow.
We have approved spending under various Authorizations for Expenditure (“AFEs”) that, as of June 30, 2012, has not yet been incurred or accrued totaling $474,000 for our share in completion costs of new wells in which we share a working interest. At present cash flow levels, we expect to have sufficient funds available for our share of both the outstanding AFEs and any additional acreage, seismic and/or drilling cost requirements that might arise from our existing opportunities. We may alter or vary all or part of any planned capital expenditures for reasons including, but not limited to changes in circumstances, unforeseen opportunities, the inability to negotiate favorable acquisition, farmout, joint venture or divestiture terms, commodity prices, lack of cash flow, and lack of additional funding.
We are continually evaluating drilling and acquisition opportunities for possible participation. Typically, at any one time, several opportunities are in various stages of evaluation. Our policy is to not disclose the specifics of a project or prospect, nor to speculate on such ventures, until such time as those various opportunities are finalized and undertaken. We caution that the absence of news and/or press releases should not be interpreted as a lack of development or activity.
12
Divestitures/Abandonments
We neither sold nor plugged any wells during the three months ended June 30, 2012.
Impact of Inflation and Pricing
We deal primarily in U.S. dollars. Inflation has not had a material impact on the Company in recent years because of the relatively low rates of inflation in the United States. However, the oil and natural gas industry can be cyclical and the demand for production places pressure on the economic stability and pricing within the industry. Typically, as prices for oil and natural gas increase, associated costs rise. Conversely, cost declines are likely to lag and may not adjust downward in proportionto declining prices. Changes in prices impact our revenues, estimates of reserves, assessments of any impairment of oil and natural gas properties, as well as values of properties being acquired or sold. Price changes have the potential to affect our ability to raise capital, borrow money, and retain personnel. While we do not presently expect business costs to materially rise, higher prices for oil and natural gas could result in increases in the costs of materials, services and personnel.
Reserves
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, proved reserves in barrels of oil equivalent (“BOE”) decreased 1% from March 31, 2012, from 1,335,000 to 1,324,000 at June 30, 2012. The reserve balance reflects the favorable impact of newly developed reserves offset by the natural decline curve for existing wells. Not reflected in this fluctuation in reserves are potential reserves for six wells which purportedly are on production at June 30, 2012, but for which no information is available on which to prepare reliable reserve estimates, as such production data has not yet been disclosed by the operator or the state regulatory agencies.
Other than the aforementioned outstanding AFEs, we do not have any other commitments beyond our office lease and software maintenance contracts. See further detail in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
13
Results of Operations
The following provides selected financial information and averages for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
14
Overview. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012, was $270,000 compared to net income of $665,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in net income resulted from the decline in oil prices coupled with an increase in expenses for the three month period.
Revenues. Oil sales revenue declined 3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $2,187,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2,128,000 for the current period, due to a lower realized price per barrel offset by the increase inreported productionas described in “Volumes and Prices” below.
Gas sales revenue decreased $201,000 (68%) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three ended June 30, 2011,as a result of having divested the Company’s working and/or override interests in 38 gas wells in Weld County, Colorado in January of this year.
Volumes and Prices. Oil sales volumes rose by 20% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The average price per barrel declined by 19% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The rise in oil sales volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was the result of a significant contribution from 19 new producing oil wells in North Dakota since the comparable period in the prior year.
The divestiture of the Company’s working and/or override interests in 38 wells in Weld County, Colorado since the comparable prior year period ended June 30, 2011, resulted in the decline in our reported natural gas production. As of June 30, 2012, we hold interests in 3 gas wells. The 32% drop in average price per Mcf for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the respective period in the prior year had only a minor impact relative to the divestiture of the aforementioned properties.
Production Expense. Production expense is comprised of the following items:
Oil and gas production expense increased $97,000 (10%) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, over the expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011, largely due to the increase in number of producing wells.
Routine lease operating expense (“LOE”), consisting of field personnel, fuel/power, chemicals, disposal and other costs, per BOE was $22.53 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $20.33 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, which reflects the industry-wide increase in vendor costs.
As a percent of oil and gas sales revenue, routine LOE was 31% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 23% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This unfavorable movement in cost in proportion to revenue reflects the effect of oil and gas prices on revenues as well as the industry-wide increase in costs.
Workover operations, which generally consist of downhole repairs on a producing well, are conducted to restore or increase production and are generally random in nature. Therefore, workovers account for unpredictable fluctuations in oil and gas expense from period to period. The number of wells on which workover costs are expended varies as does the extent of workover operations. Workover expenses decreased $59,000 (26%) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the respective period ended June 30, 2011. Consequently, workover costs in the first quarter of 2012 decreased from $8.27 per BOE in the first quarter of 2011 to $5.81 per BOE in the current quarter.
Production taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2012, increased 42% over thethree months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the reduction of activity in jurisdictions with lower tax rates and the upsurge in activity in jurisdictions with higher production tax rates. The increase in production volumes also contributed to the increase in production tax expense. As a percent of oil and gas sales revenue, production taxes rose to 9% from 6% for the respective prior year three month period. Production taxes are primarily based on the wellhead values of production, though normal fluctuations occur in the percentage between periods based upon the timing of approval of incentive tax credits in Texas, changes in tax rates, and changes in the proportion of our production between states. Because production tax rates vary from state to state our average production tax rate will vary depending on the quantities produced from each area and the production tax rates in effect for those jurisdictions.
15
While overall lifting costs (oil and gas production costs, including production taxes as well as workovers) are spread over greater reported volumes, per BOE, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, the cost rose from $33.57 to $35.00, as a result of the industry-wide rise in costs.
Other Expenses.
Depletion and depreciation increased $98,000 (50%) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in expense was a result of an increase in BOE production for the quarter and the addition of capital costs for newly drilled wells into the pool of depletable property costs.
General & Administrative (“G&A”) expense increased $239,000 (54%) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, over the expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This rise in costs is comprised primarily of compensation-related expenses for additional employees, contact labor and consultants, which account for $193,000 of the increase. Public company expenses and state franchise taxes were up $25,000 and $21,000, respectively, for the three month period.
The escalation in G&A costs resulted in the 47% increase in expense per BOE from $15.90 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $23.14 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.
Income Tax. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $8,000, as compared to $246,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our effective income tax rate was 3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The overall effective tax rate expressed as a percentage of book income before income tax for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011, was lower due primarily to lower pre-tax income and increased capital expenditures compared to the comparable period.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no significant off balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations.
16
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a “smaller reporting company,” we are not required to provide this information.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, the phrase “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012. This evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
17
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
As a “smaller reporting company,” we are not required to provide this information.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
Not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following summarizes month share repurchase activity for the first quarter of the year ended March 31, 2013:
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
None.
None.
18
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report is signed by the following authorized persons on behalf of Earthstone Energy, Inc.
20
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||