|• FORM 10-Q • EX-10.1 • EX-31.1 • EX-31.2 • EX-32.1 • EX-32.2 • XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 Commission file number 001-35296
FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
See accompanying notes
FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
See accompanying notes
FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
See accompanying notes
FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
See accompanying notes
Principles of Consolidation:
Farmers National Banc Corp. (the Company) is a one-bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company provides full banking services through its nationally chartered subsidiary, The Farmers National Bank of Canfield (the Bank). The Company provides trust services through its subsidiary, Farmers Trust Company (the Trust), and insurance services through the Banks subsidiary, Farmers National Insurance. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and its subsidiary and the Trust. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
Basis of Presentation:
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring items) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. Certain items included in the prior period financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. There was no effect on net income or total stockholders equity.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, deferred tax assets, carrying amount of goodwill and other intangibles and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The Company changed its methodology for estimating the valuation allowance for probable incurred loan losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012. During the most recent period end, management computed the historical loss percentage based upon the loss history of the past 12 quarters. In previous years, management used a historical loss percentage based on the past 8 quarters. Using a 12 quarter loss history resulted in a larger historical loss ratio than what would have been computed using an 8 quarter history. The primary factor for the change was the lower historical loss percentage applied to homogeneous and pass rated loans due to recent lower levels of net charge-offs. This new 12 quarter history methodology resulted in a $400 thousand loan loss provision for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012.
The Company provides a broad range of financial services to individuals and companies in northeastern Ohio. While the Companys chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is primarily aggregated and reported in two lines of business, the Bank segment and the Trust segment.
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive income or loss consists solely of the change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of reclassification for gains or losses recognized in income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. and International accounting principles. Overall, the guidance is consistent with existing U.S. accounting principles; however, there are some amendments that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this guidance are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The effect of adopting this standard did not have a material effect on the Companys operating results or financial condition, but the additional disclosures are included in the Fair Value footnote.
In June 2011, the FASB amended existing guidance and eliminated the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. The amendment requires that comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement or in two separate consecutive statements. The amendments in this guidance are effective as of the beginning of a fiscal reporting year, and interim periods within that year, that begins after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this amendment for the year ended December 31, 2011, by presenting comprehensive income in new Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The new statements follow the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income:
There were no security sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. There was one security sale during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011. Proceeds from the sale were $3.4 million with no gain or loss recognized.
The amortized cost and fair value of the debt securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed, CMO and SBA securities are not due at a single maturity date and are shown separately.
The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position. Unrealized losses for U.S. Treasury and U.S. government sponsored entities and corporate bonds rounded to less than $1 thousand for the periods ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. Investment securities are generally evaluated for OTTI under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions and whether the Company has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. In analyzing an issuers financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, or U.S. government sponsored enterprises, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuers financial condition. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If an entity intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and 2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income or loss. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. For equity securities, the entire amount of impairment is recognized through earnings.
As of June 30, 2012, the Companys security portfolio consisted of 416 securities, 18 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of the unrealized losses on the Companys securities are related to its holdings of mortgage-backed securities as discussed below.
Unrealized losses on debt securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities have not been recognized into income because the securities are of high credit quality, management does not have the intent to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery and the decline in fair value is largely due to fluctuations in market interest rates and not credit quality. Consequently, the fair value of such debt securities is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date.
Unrealized losses on debt securities issued by state and political subdivisions have not been recognized into income. Generally these securities have maintained their investment grade ratings and management does not have the intent to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date.
All of the Companys holdings of mortgage-backed securities-residential were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities. Unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities-residential have not been recognized into income. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities-residential and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be OTTI.
Unrealized losses on small business administration securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities have not been recognized into income because the securities are of high credit quality, management does not have the intent to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery and the decline in fair value is largely due to fluctuations in market interest rates and not credit quality. Consequently, the fair value of such debt securities is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date.
The Companys equity securities are made up of local and regional bank holdings. The unrealized losses associated with these holdings have not been recognized into income. Generally these securities have suffered as most banking securities have suffered during the recent economic cycle. The fair value is expected to recover as the banking sector recovers. Management does not have the intent to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery.
Loan balances were as follows:
The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The recorded investment in loans includes the unpaid principal balance and unamortized loan origination fees and costs, but excludes accrued interest receivable, which is not considered to be material:
The following tables present information related to impaired loans by class of loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans by class for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Interest income recognized during impairment for the three and six month periods was immaterial.
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual by class of loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by class of loans:
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Total troubled debt restructurings were $6.5 million and $4.3 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company has allocated $91 thousand and $48 thousand of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. There are no commitments to lend additional amounts to borrowers with loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan; an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan.
Troubled debt restructuring modifications involved a reduction of the notes stated interest rate in the range of 1% and 3.6% on loans with maturity periods ranging from 5 months to 41months. One loan involved an extension of the maturity date by 5 years.
The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the six month period ended June 30, 2012:
The troubled debt restructurings described above decreased the allowance for loan losses by $416 thousand during the six month period ended June 30, 2012. There were no charge offs as a result of the allowance adjustments.
There were two residential real estate loans modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there were payment defaults within the previous twelve months, for the period ended June 30, 2012. The loans were not past due at June 30, 2012. There was no additional provision or any impact to the allowance for losses associated with these loans. A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 30 days contractually past due under the modified terms.
Credit Quality Indicators:
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company establishes a risk rating at origination for all commercial loan and commercial real estate relationships. For relationships over $300 thousand management monitors the loans on an ongoing basis for any changes in the borrowers ability to service their debt. Management also affirms the risk ratings for the loans and leases in their respective portfolios on an annual basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institutions credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:
The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential, consumer indirect and direct loan classes, the Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential, consumer indirect and direct auto loans based on payment activity as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Nonperforming loans are loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest and nonaccrual loans.
Earnings Per Share:
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is shown in the following table:
Stock options for 5,000 and 28,500 shares were not considered in the computing of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because they were antidilutive.
Stock Based Compensation:
The Companys Stock Option Plan (the Plan), permitted the grant of share options to its directors, officers and employees. Under the terms of the Plan no additional shares can be issued. Option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys common shares at the date of grant, with a vesting period of 5 years and have 10-year contractual terms. At June 30, 2012 there were 5,000 outstanding options of which 3,000 were fully vested and exercisable.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model. Total compensation cost charged against income for the stock option plan for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2012 was not material. No related income tax benefit was recorded.
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2 Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value:
Investment Securities: The Company used a third party service to estimate fair value on available for sale securities on a monthly basis. This service provider is considered a leading evaluation pricing service for U.S. domestic fixed income securities. They subscribe to multiple third-party pricing vendors, and supplement that information with matrix pricing methods. The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices in active markets, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active or inputs other than quoted prices, which provide a reasonable basis for fair value determination. Such inputs may include interest rates and yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks and default rates. Finally, inputs used are derived principally from observable market data (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). The fair values of Level 3 investment securities are determined by using unobservable inputs to measure fair value of assets for which there is little, if any market activity at the measurement date, using reasonable inputs and assumptions based on the best information at the time, to the extent that inputs are available without undue cost and effort by the Companys Chief Financial Officer and Controller. For the period ended June 30, 2012 the fair value of Level 3 investment securities was immaterial.
Impaired Loans: At the time loans are considered impaired, collateral dependent impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value and non-collateral dependent loans are valued based on discounted cash flows. Impaired loans carried at fair value generally receive specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses. For collateral dependent loans fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrowers financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and managements expertise and knowledge of the client and clients business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Other Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair values are commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may use a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Appraisals for both collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial and commercial real estate properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company. Once received, a member of the Appraisal Department reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with via independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. On an annual basis, the Company compares the actual selling price of collateral that has been sold to the most recent appraised value to determine what adjustments should be made to appraisals to arrive at fair value.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial assets for which the Company has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Impaired loans that are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a principal balance of $3.7 million with a valuation allowance of $864 thousand at June 30, 2012, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $339 thousand and $420 thousand for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012. At December 31, 2011, impaired loans had a principal balance of $4.6 million, with a valuation allowance of $936 thousand. The additional provision for loan losses was $66 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $397 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2011, for loans carried at fair value. Excluded from the fair value of impaired loans, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, discussed above are $4.3 million and $2.3 million of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings, which are not carried at fair value.
Impaired commercial real estate loans, both owner occupied and non-owner occupied are valued by independent external appraisals. These external appraisals are prepared using the sales comparison approach and income approach valuation techniques. Management makes subsequent unobservable adjustments to the impaired loan appraisals. Impaired loans other than commercial real estate and other real estate owned are not considered material.
The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2012:
Other real estate owned measured at fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of $276 thousand at June 30, 2012. The Company sold nine other real estate owned properties during the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The Company recorded $73 thousand in write downs on four other real estate owned properties during the six month period ended June 30, 2012. At December 31, 2011, other real estate owned had a net carrying amount of $346 thousand. During the year ended December 31, 2011 five properties were charged down reflecting updated appraisals which resulted in a write-down of $115 thousand.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value, not previously described, are described as follows:
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2. The Company has determined that cash on hand and non-interest bearing due from bank accounts are Level 1 whereas interest bearing fed funds sold and other are Level 2.
Restricted Stock: It is not practical to determine the fair value of restricted stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Loans: Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for sale, are estimated as follows: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values resulting in a Level 3 classification. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality resulting in a Level 3 classification. Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value as described previously. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.
Loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based upon binding contracts and quotes from third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable: The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate fair value resulting in a Level 2 or Level 3 classification. The classification is the result of the association with securities, loans and deposits.
Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and money market accounts - are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date resulting in a Level 1 classification. The carrying amounts of variable rate certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date resulting Level 2 classification. Fair value for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flows calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Short-term Borrowings: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings, generally maturing within ninety days, approximate their fair values resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Long-term Borrowings: The fair values of the Companys long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Off-balance Sheet Instruments: The fair value of commitments is not considered material.
The reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered, primarily distinguished between banking and trust operations. They are also distinguished by the level of information provided to the chief operating decision makers in the Company, who use such information to review performance of various components of the business, which are then aggregated. Loans, investments, and deposits provide the revenues in the banking operation, and trust service fees provide the revenue in trust operations. All operations are domestic.
Significant segment totals are reconciled to the financial statements as follows:
Forward Looking Statements
Discussions in this report that are not statements of historical fact (including statements that include terms such as will, may, should, believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, project, intend, and plan) are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future performance and actual future results could differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Many of these factors are beyond the Companys ability to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on those forward-looking statements. The following list, which is not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, summarizes several factors that could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or expected in these forward-looking statements:
Other factors not currently anticipated may also materially and adversely affect the Companys results of operations, cash flows and financial position. There can be no assurance that future results will meet expectations. While the Company believes that the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable, the reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. In addition, these statements speak only as of the date made. The Company does not undertake, and expressly disclaims, any obligation to update or alter any statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law.
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $2.3 million, compared to $2.1 million for the same three month period in 2011. On a per share basis, net income for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 was $0.12 per diluted share, compared to $0.11 for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $4.8 million, compared to $3.8 million for the same six month period in 2011. On a per share basis, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.26, an increase of 23.8% compared to the same six month period in 2011. The tangible common equity ratio increased to 10.15% at June 30, 2012, compared to 10.11% at June 30, 2011, mainly as a result of net income. Farmers total assets reported at June 30, 2012 were $1.12 billion, representing a 4.6% increase compared to $1.07 billion in total assets recorded at December 31, 2011.
Net income increased to $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, which represents an 8% increase over the $2.1 million reported for the same period in 2011. Noninterest income increased 8.6% during the same three month period, which is consistent with the strategy to diversify revenue. Asset quality continues to improve, evidenced by the reduction in the provision for loan losses from $1.1 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 to $400 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2012. There has also been a decline in the 30-89 day delinquencies, from $3.8 million at June 30, 2011 to $2.8 million at June 30, 2012.
Net loans increased $1.4 million in comparing the June 30, 2012 balance to the December 31, 2011. Most of the loan growth in the current year has occurred in the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios. Net loans were reported at $563.4 million at June 30, 2012, which compares to $562.0 million at December 31, 2011. Deposits increased $46.5 million, or 5.5%, from $840.1 million at December 31, 2011 to $886.6 million at June 30, 2012, as customers continue to seek the safety and security of FDIC insured deposit accounts.
Stockholders equity totaled $118.9 million, or 10.6% of total assets, at June 30, 2012, an increase of $4.5 million, or 3.9%, compared to $114.4 million at December 31, 2011. The increase is mainly the result of net income and fair value adjustments in investment securities, offset by cash dividends paid to shareholders during the past six months. Shareholders received a total of $0.15 per share in cash dividends paid in the past four quarters, including a special one-time $0.03 cash dividend on February 28, 2012. Book value per share increased 3.8% from $6.10 per share at December 31, 2011 to $6.33 per share at June 30, 2012. Farmers tangible book value per share also increased 4.0% from $5.76 per share at December 31, 2012 to $5.99 per share at June 30, 2012.
Results of Operations
The following is a comparison of selected financial ratios and other results at or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Net Interest Income. The following schedules detail the various components of net interest income for the periods indicated. All asset yields are calculated on a tax-equivalent basis where applicable. Security yields are based on amortized cost.
Average Balance Sheets and Related Yields and Rates
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)