| • FORM 10-Q • EX-31.1 • EX-31.2 • EX-32.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2012
For the Transition Period from to Commission File Number: 814-00235
Rand Capital Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
(716) 853-0802 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x As of August 1, 2012 there were 6,818,934 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q
Table of ContentsPART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
See accompanying notes
Table of ContentsRAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)
See accompanying notes
Table of ContentsRAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)
See accompanying notes
Table of ContentsRAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)
See accompanying notes
Table of ContentsRAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Table of ContentsRAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS June 30, 2012 (Continued) (Unaudited)
Table of ContentsRAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS June 30, 2012 (Continued) (Unaudited) Notes to Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments (a) At June 30, 2012 restricted securities represented 100% of the value of the investment portfolio. Restricted securities are subject to one or more restrictions on resale and are not freely marketable. Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C. has not examined the business descriptions of the portfolio companies. Individual securities with values less than $100,000 are included in “Other Investments.” (b) The Date Acquired column indicates the year in which the Corporation acquired its first investment in the company or a predecessor company. Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C. has not audited the date acquired of the portfolio companies. (c) The equity percentages estimate the Corporation’s ownership interest in the portfolio investment. The estimated ownership is calculated based on the percent of outstanding voting securities held by the Corporation or the potential percentage of voting securities held by the Corporation upon exercise of warrants or conversion of debentures, or other available data. Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C. has not audited the equity percentages of the portfolio companies. The symbol “<1%” indicates that the Corporation holds an equity interest of less than one percent. (d) The Corporation uses Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “Fair Value Measurements” which defines fair value and establishes guidelines for measuring fair value. At June 30, 2012, ASC 820 designates 33% of the Corporation’s investments as “Level 2” and 67% as “Level 3” assets. Under the valuation policy of the Corporation, unrestricted publicly held securities are valued at the closing bid price for these securities for the last three trading days of the month. Restricted publicly traded securities are valued at the closing bid price for the last three trading days of the month and are discounted for the time restriction. Restricted securities are subject to restrictions on resale, and are valued at fair value as determined by the management of the Corporation and submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. Fair value is considered to be the amount which the Corporation may reasonably expect to receive for portfolio securities when sold on the valuation date. Valuations as of any particular date, however, are not necessarily indicative of amounts which may ultimately be realized as a result of future sales or other dispositions of securities and these favorable or unfavorable differences could be material. Among the factors considered in determining the fair value of restricted securities are the financial condition and operating results, projected operations, and other analytical data relating to the investment. Also considered are the market prices for unrestricted securities of the same class (if applicable) and other matters which may have an impact on the value of the portfolio company. (e) These investments are non-income producing. All other investments are income producing. Non-income producing investments have not generated cash payments of interest or dividends within the last twelve months. (f) As of June 30, 2012, the total cost of investment securities approximated $15.2 million. Net unrealized appreciation was approximately $15.5 million, which was comprised of $16.7 million of unrealized appreciation of investment securities and $1.2 million related to unrealized depreciation of investment securities. (g) Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. investment. (h) Reduction in cost and value from previously reported balances reflects current principal repayment. (i) Represents interest due (amounts over $50,000 net of reserves) from investment included as interest receivable on the Corporation’s Balance Sheet. (j) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments are investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments. (k) Affiliate investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), as those Non-Control investments in companies in which between 5% and 25% of the voting securities are owned. (l) Control investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which more than 25% of the voting securities are owned or where greater than 50% of the board representation is maintained. (m) Publicly owned company. (n) Subsequent to June 30, 2012, Synacor’s public market share price had a trading range on NASDAQ of $18.00 to $8.86 for the period July 1st through August 1, 2012. This was below the Corporation’s June 30, 2012 discounted restricted stock value of $11.08. On August 1, 2012, Synacor’s closing stock price was $8.86; a decrease of $2.22 (20%) from the Corporation’s discounted valuation as of June 30, 2012. The Corporation’s 902,362 shares of Synacor have a public market value of $8.0 million at August 1, 2012 prior to any restricted stock discounts or income tax considerations.
Table of ContentsRand Capital Corporation and Subsidiary Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) Note 1. ORGANIZATION Rand Capital Corporation (“Rand”) was incorporated under the laws of New York in 1969. Beginning in 1971, Rand operated as a publicly traded, closed-end, diversified management company that was registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). In 2001 Rand elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the 1940 Act. In 2002, Rand formed a wholly-owned subsidiary for the purpose of operating it as a small business investment company (“SBIC”) licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”). The subsidiary received an SBA license to operate as an SBIC in August 2002. The subsidiary, which had been organized as a Delaware limited partnership, was converted into a New York corporation on December 31, 2008, at which time its operations as a licensed small business investment company were continued by the newly formed corporation under the name of Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. (“Rand SBIC”). The following discussion describes the operations of Rand and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rand SBIC (collectively, the “Corporation”). The Corporation is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “Rand”. SBIC Subsidiary Since 2002, Rand has operated a wholly-owned SBIC subsidiary in order to have access to the various forms of leverage provided by the SBA to SBICs. Rand operates Rand SBIC, and Rand formerly operated the limited partnership SBIC predecessor of Rand SBIC, for the same investment purposes and with investments in the same kinds of securities as Rand. The operations of the SBIC predecessor were, and the operations of Rand SBIC are, consolidated with those of Rand for both financial reporting and tax purposes. In 2002 Rand and the predecessor SBIC subsidiary filed an initial Exemption Application with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeking an order for a number of operating exemptions that the SEC has commonly granted from certain restrictions under the 1940 Act that would otherwise limit the operations of the wholly-owned subsidiary. After the filing of the Exemption Application, the Corporation had extensive discussions with the staff of the Division of Investment Management of the SEC concerning the application. The principal substantive issue in these discussions was the structure of the predecessor of Rand SBIC as a limited partnership. Rand formed the predecessor SBIC in 2002 as a limited partnership because that was the organizational form that the SBA strongly encouraged for all new entities seeking licenses as SBICs. Rand organized the SBIC subsidiary in a manner that was consistent with the SBA’s model limited partnership forms for licensed SBICs. In that structure, the general partner of Rand SBIC was a limited liability company whose managers were the principal executive officers of Rand. Under the rules and interpretations of the SEC applicable to BDCs (which the subsidiary SBIC intended to become), if a BDC is structured in limited partnership form, then it must have general partners who serve as a board of directors, or a general partner with very limited authority and a separate board of directors, all of the persons who serve on the board of directors must be natural persons, and a majority of the directors must not be “interested persons” of the BDC. Since the managers of the limited liability company general partner were the principal executive officers of Rand, and since both the limited liability company general partner and the subsidiary SBIC were wholly-owned by Rand, Rand believed that the board of directors of Rand was the functional equivalent of a board of directors for both the general partner limited liability company and for the SBIC limited partnership. Nevertheless, the staff of the Division of Investment Management of the SEC maintained the view that if the limited partnership subsidiary was to be operated as a limited partnership BDC in compliance with the 1940 Act, then the organizational documents of the limited partnership would have to specifically provide that it would have a board of directors consisting of natural persons, a majority of whom would not be “interested persons.”
Table of ContentsWith the approval of the SBA, effective December 31, 2008, Rand merged the Rand SBIC limited partnership into a new corporation whose board of directors is the same as that of Rand. The SBA formally approved the re-licensing of the new corporation as an SBIC in February 2009. As a result of the merger, Rand SBIC is a wholly-owned corporate subsidiary of Rand, and its board of directors is comprised of the directors of Rand, a majority of whom are not “interested persons” of Rand or Rand SBIC. Following this merger, in February 2009, the Corporation filed a new Exemption Application with the SEC, which was amended in August 2009, September 2011, and again in January 2012 in response to comments from the Staff of the SEC. As amended, the Exemption Application sought an order under Sections 6(c), 12(d)(1)(J) and 57(c) of the 1940 Act for exemptions from the application of Sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (C), 18(a), 21(b), 57(a)(1) through (3), and 61(a) of the 1940 Act, and under Section 57(i) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 under the 1940 Act to permit certain joint transactions that would otherwise be prohibited by Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act, but which would not be prohibited if Rand and Rand SBIC were a single entity. The application also sought an order under Section 12(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act (the “Exchange Act”) for an exemption from separate reporting requirements for Rand SBIC under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. In general, the Corporation’s application sought exemptions that would permit:
On February 1, 2012, the SEC issued Release No. 29941 thereby giving notice of application for the grant of an order permitting the joint operations of Rand and Rand SBIC under the exemptions from the provisions of the 1940 Act described above in the Exemption Application. On February 28, 2012, the SEC granted an Order of Exemption for Rand with respect to the operations of Rand SBIC. At that time, although Rand SBIC was operated as if it were a BDC, it was registered as an investment company under the 1940 Act. Upon the Corporation’s receipt of the order granting the exemptions described above, on March 28, 2012, Rand SBIC filed an election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation – In Management’s opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in audited annual financial statements prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been omitted; however, the Corporation believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The interim results for the six months ending June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
Table of ContentsThese statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Information contained in this filing should also be reviewed in conjunction with the Corporation’s related filings with the SEC prior to the date of this report. Those filings include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Corporation’s website is www.randcapital.com. The Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, charters for the Corporation’s Board committees and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) are available through the Corporation’s website. Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rand and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rand SBIC. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Reclassification – Certain prior year income statement amounts have been reclassified to comply with regulatory rules. Cash and Cash Equivalents – Temporary cash investments having a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. Revenue Recognition – Interest Income – Interest income generally is recognized on the accrual basis except where the investment is in default or otherwise presumed to be in doubt. In such cases, interest is recognized at the time of receipt. A reserve for possible losses on interest receivable is maintained when appropriate. The Rand SBIC interest accrual is also regulated by the SBA’s “Accounting Standards and Financial Reporting Requirements for Small Business Investment Companies.” Under these rules interest income cannot be recognized if collection is doubtful, and a 100% reserve must be established. The collection of interest is presumed to be in doubt when there is substantial doubt about a portfolio company’s ability to continue as a going concern or the loan is in default more than 120 days. Management also uses other qualitative and quantitative measures to determine the value of a portfolio investment and the collectability of any accrued interest. Revenue Recognition – Dividend Income – The Corporation may receive distributions from portfolio companies that are limited liability companies and corporations and these distributions are classified as dividend income on the statement of operations. Dividend income is recognized on an accrual basis when it can be reasonably estimated. Original Issue Discount – Investments may include “original issue discount” or OID income. This occurs when the Corporation purchases a warrant and a note from a portfolio company simultaneously, which require an allocation of a portion of the purchase price to the warrant and reduces the note or debt instrument by an equal amount in the form of a note discount or OID. The note is reported net of the OID and the OID is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan. The Corporation recorded two OID’s for the six months ended June 30, 2012 for $159,000 and had OID income for the same period of $916. The Corporation recognized $37,000 in OID income for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Table of ContentsDeferred Debenture Costs – SBA debenture origination and commitment costs, which are included in other assets, are amortized ratably over the terms of the SBA debentures and are expensed when the debt is repaid. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $57,330 and $17,245, respectively. SBA Leverage – The Corporation has $2,400,000 in outstanding SBA leverage at June 30, 2012 and $4,000,000 at December 31, 2011 with maturities commencing in 2020. The total remaining SBA commitment at June 30, 2012 is $6,500,000. This outstanding leverage commitment expires on September 30, 2016. Net Assets per Share – Net assets per share are based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding. There are no common stock equivalents. Supplemental Cash Flow Information – Income taxes paid (refunded) during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $11,300 and ($448,227), respectively. Interest paid during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $105,104 and $275,590 respectively. The Corporation converted $58,701 and $47,828 of interest receivable into investments during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Accounting Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Stockholders’ Equity (Net Assets) – At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were 500,000 shares of $10.00 par value preferred stock authorized and unissued. The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 340,946 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock on the open market through October 28, 2012 at prices that are no greater than current net asset value. During 2003 and 2002 the Corporation purchased 44,100 shares of its stock for $47,206. No additional shares have been repurchased since 2003. Profit Sharing and Stock Option Plan – In 2001 the stockholders of the Corporation authorized the establishment of an Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”), that provides for the award of options to purchase up to 200,000 common shares to eligible employees. In 2002, the Corporation placed the Option Plan on inactive status as it developed a new profit sharing plan for the Corporation’s employees in connection with the formation of its SBIC subsidiary. As of June 30, 2012, no stock options had been awarded under the Option Plan. Because Section 57(n) of the 1940 Act prohibits maintenance of a profit sharing plan for the officers and employees of a BDC where any option, warrant or right is outstanding under an executive compensation plan, no options will be granted under the Option Plan while any profit sharing plan is in effect with respect to the Corporation. In 2002, the Corporation established a Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”) for its executive officers in accordance with Section 57(n) of the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Corporation will pay its executive officers aggregate profit sharing payments equal to 12% of the net realized capital gains of its SBIC subsidiary, net of all realized capital losses and unrealized depreciation of the SBIC subsidiary, for the fiscal year, computed in accordance with the Plan and the Corporation’s interpretation of the Plan. Any profit sharing paid or accrued cannot exceed 20% of the Corporation’s net income, as defined. The profit sharing payments will be split equally between the Corporation’s two executive officers, who are fully vested in the Plan.
Table of ContentsThe Corporation accrued $144,000 under the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2012. There were no amounts earned pursuant to the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation approved and accrued $584,634 under the profit sharing plan, of which $531,602 was paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The remaining $15,940 accrued at June 30, 2012 is related to an escrow receivable and will be paid when the escrow is collected. Income Taxes – The Corporation reviews the tax positions it has taken to determine if they meet a “more likely than not threshold” for the benefit of the tax position to be recognized in the financial statements. A tax position that fails to meet the more likely than not recognition threshold will result in the recording of either a reduction of an income tax receivable or a deferred tax asset, or an income tax payable or a deferred tax liability. There have been no changes in liabilities recorded for uncertain tax positions in the first six months of 2012 and the Corporation does not expect that the amounts of uncertain tax positions will change significantly within the next 12 months. It is the Corporation’s policy to include interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities in income tax expense. There were no amounts recognized for interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The Corporation is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2008 through 2011. In general, the Corporation’s state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2011. Concentration of Credit and Market Risk – The Corporation’s financial instruments potentially subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Cash is invested with banks in amounts which, at times, exceed insurable limits. Management does not anticipate non-performance by the banks. At June 30, 2012 investments in Synacor Inc. (Synacor), Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor), Liazon Corporation (Liazon), Microcision, LLC (Microcision) and Carolina Skiff LLC (Carolina Skiff) represent 33%, 24%, 7%, 6% and 5%, respectively, of the fair value of the Corporation’s investment portfolio. Subsequent Events – Subsequent to the end of the quarter, Synacor (SYNC:NASDAQ GM), a portfolio investment held by the Corporation, had a trading range on NASDAQ of $18.00 to $8.86 for the period July 1, 2012 through August 1, 2012. Synacor publicly announced its second quarter earnings results on July 25, 2012, and Synacor’s closing bid price on NASDAQ on August 1, 2012 was $8.85 which would reflect a decrease of $2.23 from the Corporation’s June 30, 2012 common stock valuation. Based on the August 1, 2012 market closing bid price of $8.85 the Corporation’s 902,362 shares of Synacor common stock had a fair market value of approximately $7.99 million, a decrease of approximately $2.0 million from the valuation at June 30, 2012, prior to any restricted stock discount and other considerations. Based on the Corporation’s 6,818,934 shares outstanding, the reduction in Synacor’s value at August 1, 2012 would have an estimated tax effected financial impact, prior to any discount for restrictions on sale, of reducing the Corporation’s June 30, 2012 Net Asset Value per share by ($0.19).
Table of ContentsValuations as of any particular date are not necessarily indicative of amounts which may ultimately be realized as a result of future sales or other dispositions of securities and these favorable or unfavorable difference could be material. Note 3. INVESTMENTS Investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Management of the Corporation and submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. The Corporation invests in loan instruments, debt instruments, and equity instruments. There is no single standard for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistent valuation process for each investment. The Corporation analyzes and values each investment quarterly, and records unrealized depreciation for an investment that it believes has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of the recorded value of an equity security is doubtful. Conversely, the Corporation will record unrealized appreciation if it believes that an underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, its equity security has also appreciated in value. These estimated fair values may differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed and these differences could be material if our assumptions and judgments differ from results of actual liquidation events. On January 1, 2008 the Corporation adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, “fair value measurements and disclosures”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Loan investments are defined as traditional loan financings with no equity features. Debt investments are defined as debt financings that include one or more equity features such as conversion rights, stock purchase warrants, and/or stock purchase options. A financing may also be categorized as a debt financing if it is accompanied by the direct purchase of an equity interest in the company. The Corporation uses several approaches to determine the fair value of an investment. The main approaches are:
The loan and debt securities may also be valued at an amount other than the price the security would command in order to provide a yield to maturity equivalent to the current yield of similar debt securities. A loan or debt instrument may be reduced in value if it is judged to be of poor quality, collection is in doubt or insufficient liquidation proceeds exist.
ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, used in the Corporation’s valuation at the measurement date.
Table of ContentsLevel 2: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other observable inputs other than quoted prices. Level 3: Unobservable and significant inputs to determining the fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement, which is not necessarily an indication of risks associated with the investment. Any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in our statement of operations as “Net increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation.” Under the valuation policy, the Corporation values unrestricted publicly held securities at the average closing bid price for these securities for the last three trading days of the month. Restricted publicly held securities are valued at the closing bid price for the last three trading days of the month and are discounted for the time restriction. See subsequent event footnote disclosure regarding Synacor. In the valuation process, the Corporation values private securities using the financial information from these portfolio companies, which may include audited and unaudited financial statements, annual projections and budgets prepared by the portfolio company and other financial and non-financial business information supplied by the companies’ management. This information is used to determine financial condition, performance, and valuation of the portfolio companies. The valuation may be reduced if a company’s performance and potential have deteriorated significantly. If the factors which led to the reduction in valuation are overcome, the valuation may be restored. Another key factor used in valuing equity investments is recent arms-length equity transactions with unrelated new investors entered into by the portfolio company. Many times the terms of these equity transactions may not be identical to the equity transactions between the portfolio company and the Corporation, and the impact of the discrepancy in transaction terms on the market value of the portfolio company may be difficult or impossible to quantify. Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Table of ContentsAssets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Table of Contents
Table of ContentsNote 4. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS The following schedule provides the financial highlights, calculated based on weighted average shares outstanding, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011:
The Corporation’s interim period results could fluctuate as a result of a number of factors; therefore results for any interim period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
Table of ContentsItem 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Statements included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this report that do not relate to present or historical conditions are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and in Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Additional oral or written forward-looking statements may be made by the Corporation from time to time, and forward-looking statements may be included in documents that are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements relating to the Corporation’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions and are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “believes,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “possible,” “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Among the important factors on which such statements are based are assumptions concerning the state of the national economy and the local markets in which the Corporation’s portfolio companies operate, the state of the securities markets in which the securities of the Corporation’s portfolio companies trade or could be traded, liquidity within the national financial markets, and inflation. Forward-looking statements are also subject to the risks and uncertainties described under the caption “Risk Factors” contained in Part II, Item 1A of this report. There may be other factors, not identified, that affect the accuracy of the Corporation’s forward-looking statements. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date it is made and, except as required by law, the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors emerge from time to time that may cause the Corporation’s business not to develop as we expect, and we cannot predict all of them. Overview The following discussion describes the financial position and operations of Rand Capital Corporation (Rand) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rand SBIC, Inc. (Rand SBIC) (collectively, the “Corporation”). Rand is incorporated in New York and has elected to operate as a business development company (“BDC”) under the 1940 Act. Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Rand SBIC, operates as a small business investment company (“SBIC”) regulated by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). On February 28, 2012, the SEC granted an Order of Exemption for Rand with respect to the operations of Rand SBIC under which Rand SBIC was permitted to elect BDC status. On March 28, 2012, Rand SBIC elected BDC status with the SEC pursuant to which it may now engage in certain transactions which would be permitted if Rand and Rand SBIC were operated as a single entity, but which are not permitted between a parent BDC and a wholly-owned subsidiary BDC without specific exemption. The Corporation anticipates that most, if not all, of its investments in the next year will be originated through the SBIC subsidiary.
Table of ContentsBusiness Developments During 2011 and the first six months of 2012 the economy continued to improve following the recession that ended in 2009. Despite an improvement in the economic landscape over the last two years, the recovery may take longer than expected due to the persistently weak labor market and continued tight credit market, particularly for small businesses. To the extent financial market conditions continue to improve, the Corporation believes its financial condition and the financial condition of the portfolio companies should continue to improve as well. It remains difficult to forecast when future exits will happen. Critical Accounting Policies The Corporation prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. A summary of our critical accounting policies can be found in the Corporation’s 2011 Form 10-K under Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Table of ContentsFinancial Condition Overview:
The Corporation’s financial condition is dependent on the success of its portfolio holdings. The following summarizes the Corporation’s investment portfolio at the period-ends indicated.
The change in investments, at cost, is comprised of the following:
Net asset value (NAV) was $4.03/share at June 30, 2012 versus $3.58/share at December 31, 2011. The Corporation paid off $3,100,000 in SBA outstanding leverage and drew down $1,500,000 in additional SBA leverage during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The outstanding SBA leverage at June 30, 2012 is $2,400,000.
Table of ContentsThe Corporation’s total investments at fair value, as estimated by management and approved by the Board of Directors, approximated 112% of net assets at June 30, 2012 compared to 98% of net assets at December 31, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents approximated 7% of net assets at June 30, 2012 compared to 19% at December 31, 2011. Results of Operations Investment Income The Corporation’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital appreciation on its equity investments while maintaining a current cash flow from its debenture and pass through equity instruments. Therefore, the Corporation invests in a mixture of debenture and equity instruments, which will provide a current return on a portion of the investment portfolio. The equity features contained in the Corporation’s investment portfolio are structured to realize capital appreciation over the long-term and may not generate current income in the form of dividends or interest. In addition, the Corporation earns interest income from investing its idle funds in money market instruments held at high grade financial institutions. Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2012 to the six months ended June 30, 2011
Interest from portfolio companies – The portfolio interest income decrease is due to the fact that two investments, Liazon Corporation (Liazon) and Chequed.com (Chequed), were converted from debt instruments to equity instruments in 2011 and therefore did not contribute to interest income during the first six months of 2012. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2012 the two Carolina Skiff LLC (Carolina Skiff) investments were accruing interest on a lower compounded principal balance. These two investments calculate interest on the principal balance plus the accrued interest and Carolina Skiff paid off approximately $1.3 million in accrued interest in December 2011. The interest recognized for the two Carolina Skiff instruments for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $106,951 versus $178,026 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. After reviewing the portfolio companies’ performance and the circumstances surrounding the investments, the Corporation has ceased accruing interest income on the following investment instrument:
Table of ContentsInterest from other investments – The decrease in interest from other investments is primarily due to lower cash balances for the six months of the current year. The cash balance at June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $2,023,652 and $10,791,049, respectively. The decrease in the cash balance is due, in part, to the fact that the Corporation paid off a total of $9,100,000 in outstanding SBA leverage in September 2011 and March 2012. In addition, the Corporation drew down an additional $1,500,000 of SBA leverage during June 2012. Dividend and other investment income – Dividend income is comprised of distributions from Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) in which the Corporation has invested. The Corporation’s investment agreements with certain LLCs require the LLCs to distribute funds to the Corporation for payment of income taxes on its allocable share of the LLCs profits. These dividends will fluctuate based upon the profitability of the LLCs and the timing of the distributions. In addition, in the current year the Corporation has begun to receive dividends from a non-LLC portfolio company. Dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 consisted of a distribution from Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor) for $313,359, New Monarch Machine Tool, Inc. (Monarch) for $130,193, Carolina Skiff LLC (Carolina Skiff) for $3,963, Somerset Gas Transmission Company, LLC (Somerset) for $6,950 and NDT for $422. Dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of a distribution from Monarch for $66,239 and Carolina Skiff for $4,317. The Corporation exited its debt investment in Monarch in 2008 and still retains a small ownership in the company. Monarch started distributing its profits to its investors during 2011. Other income – Other income consists of the revenue associated with the amortization of financing fees charged to the portfolio companies upon successful closing of Rand SBIC financings and income associated with board attendance fees. The income associated with the amortization of financing fees was $0 and $1,550 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The board fees were $4,000 and $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Operating Expenses Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2012 to the six months ended June 30, 2011
Operating expenses predominately consist of interest expense on outstanding SBA borrowings, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses including shareholder and office expenses and professional fees. The decrease in operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2012 is comprised primarily of a 63% or ($184,788) decrease in SBA interest expense. Interest expense decreased due to the fact that the Corporation paid off a total of $9,100,000 in SBA leverage in September 2011 and March 2012 and drew down $1,500,000 in SBA leverage during June 2012. This decrease is offset by a $144,000 increase in Bonus and Profit Sharing expense and a 33% or $17,250 increase in Directors’ Fees. Bonus and Profit Sharing expense increased due to the accrual of $144,000 in profit sharing obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The Directors’ Fee expense increased due to an increase in the Directors’ fee structure during the current year. Net Realized Gains and Losses on Investments During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Corporation recognized a realized gain of $35,485 on the sale of 83,825 shares of Synacor, Inc. (Synacor). Synacor completed an Initial Public Offering (IPO) at $5.00 on February 10, 2012 trading on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SYNC”. The Corporation owned 986,187 shares prior to the IPO.
Table of ContentsDuring the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation recognized a realized loss of ($1,780,611) on Niagara Dispensing and a loss of ($293,519) on Associates Interactive LLC (Associates). Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation of Investments The Corporation recorded a net increase in unrealized appreciation on investments of $4,974,386 during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and a net increase of $2,164,432 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in unrealized appreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was comprised of the following items:
Synacor, as a publicly traded stock, is marked to market at the end of each quarter. The stock was valued at a three day average bid price and was discounted due to trading restrictions on the stock which expire on August 11, 2012. The Corporation valued its 902,362 shares of Synacor at $11.08 at June 30, 2012 which reflects a discount from the average closing bid price for the last three trading days of June 2012. See the subsequent event disclosure regarding Synacor’s public stock market prices subsequent to the end of the quarter. Liazon completed another significant equity financing, with a higher valuation, during the second quarter of 2012 and it was led by a new non-strategic outside investor. The Corporation, therefore, in accordance with its valuation policy, increased the value of its holdings in Liazon based on this financing. The Ultra-Scan investment was written down during the six months ended June 30, 2012 after a review by the Corporation’s management of Ultra-Scan’s financials and an analysis of the liquidation preferences of senior securities. The increase in unrealized appreciation of $2,164,432 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was comprised of the following items:
In accordance with its valuation policy, the Corporation increased the value of its holdings in Liazon based on a significant equity financing during the second quarter of 2011 by a new non-strategic outside investor that had a higher valuation for this portfolio company. All of these value adjustments resulted from a review by management using the guidance set forth by ASC 820 and the Corporation’s established valuation policy.
Table of ContentsNet Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations The Corporation accounts for its operations under GAAP for investment companies. The principal measure of its financial performance is “net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations” on its consolidated statements of operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the net increase in net assets from operations was $3,084,065 as compared to a net decrease in net assets from operations of ($188,311) for the same six month period in 2011. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is a result of a ($59,007) net investment loss and a net realized and unrealized gain, net of tax, of $3,143,072. The decrease for the six months ending June 30, 2011 was a result of a ($250,843) net investment loss and a net realized and unrealized gain, net of tax, of $62,532. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Corporation’s principal objective is to achieve capital appreciation. Therefore, a significant portion of the investment portfolio is structured to maximize the potential for capital appreciation and certain portfolio investments may be structured to provide little or no current yield in the form of dividends or interest payments. As of June 30, 2012 the Corporation’s total liquidity, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, was $2,023,652. During September 2011 and March 2012, the Corporation repaid a total of $9,100,000 in existing SBA leverage and drew down $1,500,000 in additional leverage during June 2012. At June 30, 2012 the Corporation has $2,400,000 in outstanding SBA leverage. In addition, during 2011, the Corporation contributed $1,000,000 of additional regulatory capital to the Rand SBIC, Inc. subsidiary and was approved for $8,000,000 in new SBA leverage, of which there is $6,500,000 remaining as of June 30, 2012. Management expects that cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2012, coupled with the available SBA leverage and the scheduled interest and anticipated dividend payments on its portfolio investments, will be sufficient to meet the Corporation’s cash needs throughout the next twelve months. The Corporation is evaluating potential exits from portfolio companies to increase the amount of liquidity available for new investments, operating activities and future SBA obligations.
The Corporation’s investment activities contain elements of risk. The portion of the Corporation’s investment portfolio consisting of equity and debt securities in private companies is subject to valuation risk. Because there is typically no public market for the equity and equity-linked debt securities in which it invests, the valuation of the equity interests in the portfolio is stated at “fair value” as determined in good faith by the management of the Corporation and submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. This is in accordance with the Corporation’s investment valuation policy. (The discussion of valuation policy contained in “Note 3.—Investments” in the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 1 of this report is hereby incorporated herein by reference.) In the absence of readily ascertainable market values, the estimated value of the Corporation’s portfolio may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if a ready market for the investments existed. Any changes in valuation are recorded in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of operations as “Net unrealized appreciation on investments.” At times the Corporation’s portfolio may include marketable securities, including marketable securities traded in the over-the-counter market. In addition, there may be securities in the Corporation’s portfolio for which no regular trading market exists. In order to realize the full value of a security, the market must trade in an orderly fashion or a willing purchaser must be available when a sale is to be made. Should an economic or other event occur that would not allow markets to trade in an orderly fashion, the Corporation may not be able to realize the fair value of its marketable investments or other investments in a timely manner.
Table of ContentsAt June 30, 2012 a portion of the Corporation’s investment portfolio includes a minority equity investment in a publicly traded company, Synacor, the value of which is subject to market price volatility. The Corporation recorded a $4.1 million increase in unrealized appreciation on the value of its holdings in Synacor based on the average closing bid price of the security for the last three trading days in June 2012. The security is restricted through August 11, 2012 and its market value will fluctuate from the Corporation’s June 30, 2012 valuation. The Synacor investment represents approximately 33% of the Corporations $30.7 million investment portfolio at June 30, 2012. See subsequent event footnote disclosure. As of June 30, 2012, the Corporation did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or hedging or similar derivative financial instrument investments.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Table of ContentsPART II. OTHER INFORMATION
None
See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Risk Factors from our 2011 report on Form 10-K remains applicable with the exception of the following additions: Fluctuations of Quarterly Results The Corporation’s quarterly operating results could fluctuate as a result of a number of factors. These factors include, among others, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which portfolio companies encounter competition in their markets and general economic conditions and the market value of publicly traded securities. As a result of these factors, results for any one quarter should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future quarters.
None
None
None
None
Table of Contents
The following exhibits are filed with this report or are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing, in accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Table of ContentsSignatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Dated: August 2, 2012
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||