XOTC:DEAC Elite Data Services Inc Quarterly Report 10-Q Filing - 6/30/2012

Effective Date 6/30/2012

XOTC:DEAC Fair Value Estimate
Premium
XOTC:DEAC Consider Buying
Premium
XOTC:DEAC Consider Selling
Premium
XOTC:DEAC Fair Value Uncertainty
Premium
XOTC:DEAC Economic Moat
Premium
XOTC:DEAC Stewardship
Premium
 


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ________, to ________.
 
Commission File Number:  0-11050
 
Dynamic Energy Alliance Corporation
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Florida
 
59-2181303
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Memphis Clark Tower, 5100 Popular Avenue, Ste. 2700, Memphis, TN 38137
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number including area code: (901) 414-0003
 
233 North Garrard, Rantoul, IL 61866 Fiscal year December 31
Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Larger accelerated filer    
o
Accelerated filer        
o
Non-accelerated filer        
o
Smaller reporting company       
x

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o   No x

As of August 17, 2012, 81,554,504 shares of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.00003, were outstanding
 


 
 

 
DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012
 
INDEX
 
     
Page
 
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
   
Item 1.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
   
4
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
   
5
 
 
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
   
6
 
 
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
   
7
 
 
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
   
8
 
           
Item 2. 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
   
27
 
Item 3.   
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
   
31
 
Item 4. 
Controls and Procedures
   
31
 
   
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
   
Item 1.  
Legal Proceedings
   
32
 
Item 1A. 
Risk Factors
   
32
 
Item 2.   
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
   
38
 
Item 3.  
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
   
38
 
Item 4.   
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
   
38
 
Item 5.  
Other Information
   
38
 
Item 6.   
Exhibits
   
39
 
Signatures
   
40
 
 
 
2

 
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). We have based these statements on our beliefs and assumptions, based on information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, our total market opportunity and our business plans and objectives set forth under the sections entitled "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. Our future results and requirements may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and requirements are beyond our control. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed in "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," investors should consider those discussed under "Risk Factors, and elsewhere herein, and in other filings with the SEC."

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our business anticipated results of our operations, strategy or planned capital expenditures, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
 
 
3

 
 
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
 
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
 
 
4

 
 
DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
   
As of
June 30,
2012
   
As of
December 3,
2011
 
    (Unaudited)        
ASSETS
Current            
Cash
  $ 570     $ 7,652  
Accounts receivable
    683       -  
Total Assets
  $ 1,253     $ 7,652  
                 
LIABILITIES
Current
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $ 274,812     $ 159,252  
Accounts payable to related parties
    108,863       46,863  
Income taxes payable
    3,500       15,500  
Loans payable to a related party
    110,582       89,584  
Contingent consideration payable
    1,015,944       996,414  
Total Liabilities
    1,513,701       1,307,613  
                 
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
               
Authorized:
               
                 
Preferred stock, Series A convertible : 50,000,000 shares authorized, par value: $0.0001 (Note 1 below.)
               
                 
Common stock: 300,000,000 shares authorized, par value: $0.00003 (Note 1 below.)
               
Issued and Outstanding:
               
Preferred stock: 7,732,824 shares
    773       773  
Common stock: 81,304,504 shares
    2,710       2,710  
Additional paid-in capital (Note 2 below)
    3,942,165       3,642,165  
Accumulated deficit
    (5,458,096 )     (4,945,609 )
Total Stockholders’ Deficit
    (1,512,448 )     (1,299,961 )
                 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
  $ 1,253     $ 7,652  
 
(1)
The capital accounts of the Company have been retroactively restated to reflect the equivalent number of common shares based on the exchange ratio of the merger transaction in determining the basic and diluted weighted average shares. See Note 3.
 
(2)
The March 9, 2011 capital accounts of the Company have been retroactively restated to reflect the equivalent number of common shares based on the exchange ratio of the merger transaction.
 
Theaccompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
5

 
 
DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
                                 
Revenue
  $ 103,776     $ 1,493,342     $ 405,479     $ 1,493,342  
Cost of revenue
    -       -       -       -  
Gross profit
    103,776       1,493,342       405,479       1,493,342  
                                 
Operating expenses
                               
Project development costs
    31,593       -       180,984       15,210  
Consulting services
    155,500       68,078       411,000       446,078  
General and administrative expenses
    185,621       157,872       304,195       233,634  
      372,714       225,950       896,179       694,922  
                                 
Net operating (loss) income     (268,938 )     1,267,392       (490,700 )     798,420  
                                 
Other expenses                        
Interest expense
    4,834       -       21,787       -  
(Loss) income before provision for income tax
    (273,772 )     1,267,392       (512,487 )     798,420  
Provision for income tax
    -       506,320       -       506,320  
Net (loss) income
  $ (273,772 )   $ 761,072     $ (512,487 )   $ 292,100  
                                 
Basic and fully diluted income (loss) per share
  $ (0.00 )   $ 0.01     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.01  
                                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted (Note 1)
    81,304,504       77,882,034       81,304,504       48,791,580  
 
(1)
The capital accounts of the Company have been retroactively restated to reflect the equivalent number of common shares based on the exchange ratio of the merger transaction in determining the basic and diluted weighted average shares. See Note 3.
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
6

 
 
DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
                 
Cash flows from operating activities:
  $ (512,487 )   $ 292,100  
Net (loss) income
               
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash:
               
Non-cash consulting expenses
    300,000       548,000  
Recapitalization under reverse merger
    -       (5,391 )
                 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (683 )     (55,809 )
Accounts payable
    177,560       40,288  
Income taxes payable
    (12,000 )     506,320  
Loans payable to (due from) related parties
    20,998       (92,893 )
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    (26,612 )     1,232,615  
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Shares acquired and returned to treasury
    -       (322,000 )
Cash received from (paid on) contingent consideration
    19,530       (1,431,768 )
Proceeds from convertible debentures
    -       240,400  
Cash received from reverse merger
    -       277,391  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    19,530       (1,235,977 )
                 
Net decrease in cash
    (7,082 )     (3,362 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    7,652       3,955  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 570     $ 593  
                 
Supplemental disclosure:
               
Income taxes paid
  $ -     $ -  
Interest paid
  $ -     $ -
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
7

 
 
DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED June 30, 2012 and 2011
 
Note 1.  
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
Dynamic Energy Alliance Corporation (“DEAC”) was formerly Mammatech Corporation (“MAMM”) (or the “Company”), and was incorporated in the State of Florida on November 23, 1981 as Mammatech Corporation. The fiscal year end of the Company was changed to December 31 from August 31. The Company formally changed its name to Dynamic Energy Alliance Corporation, having amended its Articles of Incorporation effective September 15, 2011.

Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Dynamic Energy Development Corporation (“DEDC”), the Company has under way implementation of a business to develop, commercialize, and sell innovative technologies in the recoverable energy sector. Specifically, it is focused on identifying, combining and enhancing existing industry technologies with proprietary recoverable production and finishing processes to produce synthetic oil, carbon black, gas, and carbon steel from discarded or waste tires waste. This process will be accomplished with limited residual waste product and significant reductions in greenhouse gases, compared to traditional processing. To maximize this opportunity, the Company has developed a scalable, commercial development strategy to build "Energy Campuses" with low operational costs and long-term, recurring revenues.
 
In conjunction with the acquisition of DEDC, the Company acquired Transformation Consulting (‘TC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DEDC.  TC provides business development, marketing and administrative consulting services.  Through a January 2010 management services and agency agreement (“Agency Agreement”), TC receives revenues from a related party based on billings received from certain of TC’s direct to consumer membership club products that were transferred to the related party under the Agency Agreement.

Merger Acquisition by way of Share Exchange

On March 9, 2011, the Company effectively completed a merger acquisition transaction whereby it entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (“SEA”) with DEDC, a privately held corporation, with DEDC becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. All of the shares of DEDC were transferred to Dynamic Development Corporation, a Delaware corporation. This company was then merged with the Company. The share transactions to complete the merger transaction are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Merger.” All costs incurred in connection with the Merger have been expensed.  Following the Merger, the Company abandoned its prior business and concurrently adopted DEDC’s business plan as its principal business.  In addition, the director and officer of MAMM were replaced by the directors and officers of DEDC.
 
 
8

 
 
Note 2.  
BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Dynamic Energy Alliance Corporation are presented in accordance with the requirements for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which were of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company on a consistent basis, have been made.
 
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K/A The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read, or have access to, the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year, and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context.  Accordingly, footnote disclosure, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, has been omitted.  The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year ending December 31, 2012.
 
Going Concern

Since inception, the Company has a cumulative net loss of $5,458,096. The Company currently has only limited working capital with which to continue its operating activities. The amount of capital required to sustain operations is subject to future events and uncertainties.  The Company must secure additional working capital through loans, sale of equity securities, or a combination, in order to implement its business plans.  There can be no assurance that such funding will be available in the future, or available on commercially reasonable terms. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
 
The accompanying financial statements have been presented on the basis of the continuation of the Company as a going concern and do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
The Company has generated revenue in the amount of $405,479 for the first six months of 2012. Management has continued to manage its burn rate, budget versus actual results for 2012 to ensure appropriate funding is on hand for its operation. If the Company's 2012 projections are not expected to be met, the company will be required to decrease expenses and raise additional equity and/or debt financing. 

Note 3.  
MERGER WITH DYNAMIC ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

(a)
Description of the Merger
 
This merger acquisition was transacted as follows (The Company’s shares of common stock disclosures in this note have been presented on a post forward stock split basis.):

The Company, DEDC and Verdad Telecom (“MAMM Controlling Shareholder”) entered into a Share Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which MAMM Controlling Shareholder, owning an aggregate of 44,786,188 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”), equivalent to 85.5% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock (the “Old MAMM Shares”) would return its shares to treasury and DEDC shareholders would exchange 17,622,692 DEDC shares on a one for one basis of newly issued shares of the Company.  On return of such shares to treasury, the MAMM Controlling Shareholder received a cash payment of $322,000 (the “Purchase Price”).
 
 
9

 
 
In addition, prior to the effective time of the Merger, 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to a debenture holder pursuant to an investment bonus feature in the convertibility of debenture notes.

Immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, 22,871,100 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued and outstanding. Upon completion of the Merger, the DEDC shareholders owned approximately 69.8% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock.

All references to share and per share amounts in these financial statements have been restated to retroactively reflect the number of common shares of MAMM common stock issued pursuant to the Merger.

(b)
Accounting Treatment of the Merger; Financial Statement Presentation
 
The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805-40-25.1, which provides that the merger of a private operating company into a non-operating public shell corporation without significant net assets typically results in the owners and management of the private company having actual or effective operating control of the combined company after the transaction, with the shareholders of the former public corporation continuing only as passive investors.  

These transactions are considered by the Securities and Exchange Commission to be capital transactions in substance, rather than business combinations. That is, the transaction is equivalent to the issuance of stock by the private company for the net monetary assets of the shell corporation, accompanied by a recapitalization.

Accordingly, the Merger has been accounted for as a recapitalization, and, for accounting purposes, DEDC is considered the accounting acquirer in a reverse acquisition.

The Company’s historical accumulated deficit for periods prior to March 9, 2011, in the amount of $3,075,165 was eliminated by offset against additional-paid-in-capital, and the accompanying financial statements present the previously issued shares of MAMM common stock as having been issued pursuant to the Merger on March 9, 2011.

The shares of common stock of the Company issued to the DEDC stockholders in the Merger are presented as having been outstanding since December 13, 2010, the month when DEDC first sold its equity securities.
 
Because the Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), the financial statements for periods prior to March 9, 2011 reflect only the operations of DEDC.
 
 
10

 

Note 4.  
ACQUISITION OF TRANSFORMATION CONSULTING
 
On March 9, 2011, DEDC acquired all of the outstanding shares, of Transformation Consulting (“TC”) pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 25, 2011 and Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 30, 2011.  The purchase price for the Shares was $2,000,000, payable from the gross revenues (pre-tax) of TC, as received, subject to the following contingent reduction or increase of the purchase price.  If TC’s gross revenues during the two years following the closing are less than $2,000,000, then the purchase price for the shares shall be reduced to the actual revenue received by TC during the two year period.  If TC’s revenues during the same two year period exceed $2,000,000, then the purchase price for the shares shall be increased by one-half of the excess revenues over $2,000,000 (“contingent consideration”). At the time of the acquisition, TC had minimal tangible assets and the entire $2,000,000 purchase price was allocated to a customers’ list intangible asset.

Note 5. 
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Principles of Consolidation

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, Dynamic Energy Development Corporation and Transformation Consulting.  All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of the Company's financial statements in conformity with United States GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Development Costs
 
Development costs are expensed in the period they are incurred unless they meet specific criteria related to technical, market and financial feasibility, as determined by management, including but not limited to the establishment of a clearly defined future market for the product, and the availability of adequate resources to complete the project. If all criteria are met, the costs are deferred and amortized over the expected useful life, or written off if a product is abandoned. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, total development costs amounted to $31,593 and $0, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, total development costs amounted to $180,984 and $15,210, respectively. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no deferred product development costs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents, if any, include all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no cash equivalents.
 
 
11

 
 
Financial Instruments and Concentration of Risk

The fair values of financial instruments, which include cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and convertible notes, were estimated to approximate their carrying values due to the immediate or relatively short maturity of these instruments. Management does not believe that the Company is subject to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. During the six month ended June 30, 2012, the Company earned all revenues from one customer.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("Topic 820"). Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures.

The three levels are defined as follows:

·   Leve l 1
inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
·   Leve l 2
inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
·   Leve l 3
inputs to valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement.
 
The fair value of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate carrying value because of the short-term nature of these items.
 
Management believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of loan to related parties because the transactions cannot be assumed at arm's length, the terms are not deemed to be market terms, there are no quoted values available for these instruments, and an independent valuation would not be practical due to the lack of data regarding similar instruments, if any, and the associated potential costs.
 
Intangible Assets and Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company has adopted the provision codified in ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other which revises the accounting for purchased goodwill and intangible assets. Under ASC 350, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized and are tested for impairment annually. The determination of any impairment would include a comparison of estimated future operating cash flows anticipated during the remaining life with the net carrying value of the asset as well as a comparison of the fair value to book value of the Company.

Intangible assets comprised the customer lists purchased in connection with the acquisition of Transformation Consulting on March 9, 2011.  The intangible assets were reported at acquisition cost and were to be amortized on the basis of management’s estimate of the future cash flows from this asset over approximately five years, which was management’s initial estimate of the useful life of the customer lists.

In accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-15 (prior authoritative literature: SFAS 144), the Company performed an assessment as of December 31, 2011. The Company assessed the recoverability of the carrying value of its intangible assets based on estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated from this asset. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company determined that, based on estimated future cash flows, the intangible asset was fully impaired; accordingly, an impairment loss of the carrying amount of $2,000,000 was recognized and is included in impairment loss on intangibles.
 
 
12

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the FASB ASC Section 605-10-S99, Revenue Recognition, Overall, SEC Materials ("Section 605-10-S99"). Section 605-10-S99 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.

Specifically with respect to TC, commission revenue is earned on consulting services provided to a company controlled by a director of the Company.  TC earns these commissions based on this company’s revenues from certain direct to consumer membership club products. Commissions earned are recorded when deposited into an escrow account, effectively allowing for uncertainty of collectability and bad debt issues. 
 
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The number of common shares that are exercisable or converted into common stock is not material to effect diluted EPS results. Further, since the Company shows losses for the periods presented, basic and diluted loss per share are the same for all periods presented. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no outstandings dilutive securities.

Certain Reclassification

Certain 2011 items were reclassified to conform to current year presentation.  Such reclassifications had no effect on 2011 net income.

Income Taxes
 
Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted the accounting standards codified in ASC 740, Income Taxes as of its inception. Pursuant to those standards, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. Potential benefit of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not that it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.
 
ASC 740-10-25 prescribes recognition thresholds that must be met before a tax position is recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. An entity may only recognize or continue to recognize tax positions that meet a "more likely than not" threshold. Based on its evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements.
 
The Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 that, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective income tax rate.
 
The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax issues as components of income tax expense. The Company did not recognize or have any accrual for interest and penalties relating to income taxes as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
 
 
13

 

Common Share Non-Monetary Consideration
 
In situations where common shares are issued and the fair value of the goods or services received is not readily determinable, the fair value of the common shares is used to measure and record the transaction. The fair value of the common shares issued in exchange for the receipt of goods and services is based on the stock price as of the earliest of the date at which:
 
i)  the counterparty’s performance is complete;
 
ii)  a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the common shares is reached; or
 
iii)  the common shares are issued if they are fully vested and non-forfeitable at that date.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
On December 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions codified in ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. The Company adopted those provisions using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized for all periods prior to December 1, 2005 includes: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of November 30, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value and b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to November 30, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value. In addition, deferred stock compensation related to non-vested options is required to be eliminated against additional paid-in capital. The results for periods prior to December 1, 2005 were not restated.
 
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from parties other than employees in accordance with ASC 505, Equity. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the counterparty.
 
Share Purchase Warrants

The Company accounts for common share purchase warrants at fair value in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Black-Scholes option pricing valuation method is used to determine fair value of these warrants. Use of this method requires that the Company make assumptions regarding stock volatility, dividend yields, expected term of the warrants and risk-free interest rates.

Recently and Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
Adopted -
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04: “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. This is a new accounting standard on fair value measurements that clarifies the application of existing guidance and disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting standard does not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. 
 
 
14

 
 
In September 2011, the FASB issued an update that allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine whether they need to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under the option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless it determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The guidance is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 although early adoption is permitted. The adoptation of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
 
Not Adopted -
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This accounting update requires that an entity disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position.  The accounting update is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this accounting update and assessing the impact, if any, it may have on its financial position and results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The update simplifies the guidance for testing the decline in the realizable value (impairment) of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. Examples of intangible assets subject to the guidance include indefinite-lived trademarks, licenses, and distribution rights. The standard applies to all public, private, and not-for-profit organizations.  The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this accounting update and assessing the impact, if any, it may have on its financial position and results of operations.
 
Note 6. 
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND AMOUNTS OWING
 
a)
Loans payable to related party

The amounts due to a related party at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 of $110,582 and $89,584, respectively, represent an unsecured promissory note due to a shareholder and director of the Company. These amounts are unsecured, bear interest at 15% per annum and are repayable on demand, with accumulated interest.

b)
Contingent consideration payable to related party
 
Pursuant to Stock Purchase Agreement between a director of the company (“the Director”) and DEDC, dated February 25, 2011 and Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 30, 2011 and March 31, 2012, respectively, DEDC acquired all of the outstanding shares, of Transformation Consulting (“TC”).  The purchase price for the shares was $2,000,000, payable from the gross revenues of TC, subject to the following contingent reduction or increase of the purchase price.  If TC’s gross revenues during the two years following the closing are less than $2,000,000, then the purchase price for the shares shall be reduced to the actual revenue received by TC during the two year period.  If TC’s revenues during the same two year period exceed $2,000,000, then the purchase price for the shares shall be increased by one-half of the excess revenues over $2,000,000 (“contingent consideration”).

TC’s revenues are primarily related to revenues received from an entity controlled by the Director (“related entity”) under a January 2010, Management Services and Agency Agreement (“Agency Agreement”).   Under the Agency Agreement, TC receives revenues based on billings received from certain of TC’s direct to consumer membership club products that were transferred to the related entity under the Agency Agreement.  Pursuant to the Agency Agreement, TC agreed to (1) transfer to the related entity the ownership of certain TC current direct to consumer membership products upon TC receiving a total of $1,000,000 in revenues; (2) introduce the related entity to TC’s existing and potential vendors for use in managing the TC current programs on behalf of TC; and (3) have the related entity act as TC’s sales agent for new product sales.  In consideration, TC receives all gross receipts of existing sales, less the related entity’s management fee of 20% of gross sales. Separately, TC and the related entity would each be entitled to 50% of new business sales.  After total payments of $2,000,000 to TC from all related revenues under the Agency Agreement, the related entity would no longer be obligated to pay TC any further compensation.
 
 
15

 
 
Pursuant to the contingent consideration of $2,000,000 due to the Director from TC, all revenues generated by TC under the Agency Agreement are disbursed to Director.  All cash management services, pertaining to the revenues generated by TC under the Agency Agreement are managed by the Director directly from an escrow account, including deposits of revenues and payment disbursements to the Director. As a result, the Company does not have access to the cash flow from such revenues, which are administered from said escrow account.  Contingency consideration is payable based on a payment schedule as follows:
  
-
Payment one: the first $900,000 of gross revenues paid on receipt;
-
Payment two: the next $400,000 of gross revenues paid at the later of 90 days of receipt or June 30, 2012;
-
Payment three:  the next $400,000 of gross revenues paid at the later of 90 days of receipt or September 30, 2012;
-
Payment four:  the next $300,000 of gross revenues paid at the later of 90 days of receipt or December 31, 2012.
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, TC gross revenues totaled $103,776 and $1,493,342, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, TC gross revenues totaled $405,479 and $1,493,342, respectively.
 
Through June 30, 2012, payments, net of refunds, made to Director totaled $984,056.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, contingency consideration payable to Director is $1,015,944 and $996,414, respectively, as follows:
 
   
As of
June 30,
2012
   
As of
December 31,
2011
 
                 
Contingency consideration due
 
$
2,000,000
   
$
2,000,000
 
Less:  payments, net of refunds, to Director
   
984,056
     
1,003,586
 
   
$
1,015,944
   
$
996,414
 
 
c)
Transactions with related parties

Related party transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

The Company incurred expenses as follows:

(i)  
Consulting services for development and construction of the Company’s energy campus project, provided by a company related through common shareholdings - for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, in the amount of $60,000 and $0, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, expenses totaled $120,000 and $0, respectively.   At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company has an accounts payable balance of $101,863 and $46,863, respectively, to this related party. Note:  In July 2012, the consulting services agreement was terminated and the accounts payable balance at June 30, 2012 was settled in full.  See Note 11. Subsequent Events for discussion.
   
(ii)  
Strategic business and legal services provided by a company related through common shareholdings - for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, in the amount of $10,500 and $0, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, expenses totaled $21,000 and $0, respectively. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company has an accounts payable balance of $7,000 and $0, respectively to this related party.

 
16

 
 
On or about July 9, 2011, and as further amended on December 30, 2011, the Company executed a contractor agreement (the “Contractor Agreement”), with an entity controlled by a director and shareholder of the Company (the “Contractor”), in which the Company is obligated to issue one or more warrants to acquire a total of 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the “Shares”) every 90 days during the term of the Contractor Agreement (the “Warrant”). During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of a Warrant for 1,000,000 Shares to this Contractor.  During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 2,000,000 Shares to this Contractor.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company was obligated to issue one or more Warrants totaling 8,000,000 Shares to this Contractor under the Contractor Agreement, in addition to 1,000,000 Shares every 90 days for a total of five (5) years.  All warrants are exercisable at $0.0001 per share, and have a 60 month term from the date each issuance, and are exercisable at the sole discretion of the Contractor. The amount of consideration for the services rendered by the Contractor to the Company shall be determined on the fair market value of the Shares on the date of each issuance. 
 
Note 7.  
CAPITAL STOCK
 
Authorized

The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares (previously 200,000,000 shares) of preferred stock, having a par value of $0.0001 per share, and 300,000,000 shares (previously 150,000,000 shares) of common stock having a par value of $0.00003 per share.

Forward Stock Split and Authorized Capital Stock
 
Effective September 15, 2011, by Articles of Amendment, the Company effected the following changes:
 
(1)  
forward split all outstanding shares of the Corporation’s common stock on a 3 for 1 basis. Accordingly, common share disclosure has been presented on a post split basis, except where noted.
 
(2)  
increased authorized capital stock to 500,000,000 shares, of which 300,000,000 shares shall be common stock, par value $0.00003, and 200,000,000 shares shall be preferred stock, par value $0.0001, and to give the Board of Directors the power to fix by resolution the rights, preferences and privileges of preferred stock.
 
On October 5, 2011, by approval of shareholders of the Company and the Florida Secretary of State, the authorized number of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was changed to 50,000,000 shares from the previously authorized 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Certificate of Designation for these shares provides among other rights and privileges the requirement that 75% of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred must give their prior consent, before the Company can elect members to the Board of Directors, issue any securities of the Company or affect any fundamental transaction (defined as acquisitions, mergers, sale or purchase of substantially all assets, etc.).
 
The Company effectuated these amendments during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2011.
 
The shareholders of convertible preferred stock are voted equally with the shares of the Company’s common stock. Each share of the convertible preferred stock is convertible into two fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock, subject to certain adjustments, as follows:
 
(i)
during the period commencing on September 15, 2013 and terminating on September 15, 2015 (“the quarterly conversion period”), each holder of convertible preferred stock may elect to convert, on each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 occurring during the quarterly conversion period, that number of shares of convertible preferred stock equal to 25% of the total number of shares of convertible preferred stock initially issued to such Holder into full paid and non-assessable shares of common stock; and
   
(ii)
after the quarterly conversion period, each Holder may elect to convert all or any portion of its shares of convertible preferred stock then outstanding into full paid and non-assessable shares of common stock.
 
 
17

 
 
Issued and Outstanding

Preferred Stock

There were 7,732,824 preferred shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

On October 10, 2011, the Company issued a total of 8,340,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001, in exchange for the purchase and cancellation of certain convertible debentures and other outstanding obligations of DEDC, a subsidiary of the Company, to four debenture holders, all directors of the Company, in the total amount of $1,146,565.

On December 30, 2011, the original issuance total was adjusted to 7,732,824 shares, in order to reflect certain payments in the amount of $121,435 made to one of the debenture holders during the period ending December 31, 2011. As a result, the total amount of the debt cancelled was adjusted to $1,146,565, in exchange for a total issuance of 7,732,824 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock.
 
Common Stock

There were 81,304,504 common shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, there were no common share transactions.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the following share transactions occurred, presented on a retroactive post forward split basis:

(1)  
Prior to the reverse merger and in connection to the reverse merger and recapitalization –
   
(i)      
158,141,439 shares had been issued prior to the reverse merger;
(ii)      
134,358,566 shares were acquired for cash payment of $322,000 and returned to treasury;
(iii)      
45,110,076 shares were issued in connection with the reverse merger;
(iv)      
6,000,000 shares were issued to a convertible debenture holder as an investment bonus for investment;
(v)      
22,871,100 shares were issued on recapitalization, i.e. immediately prior to the effective time of the merger.

The Company's reverse merger transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of the Company whereby the historical financial statements and operations of the acquired company become the historical financial statements of the Company, with no adjustment of the carrying value of the assets and liabilities.
 
 
18

 
 
The financial statements have been prepared as if the reverse merger transactions had occurred retroactively as of the periods presented. Share and share amounts reflect the effects of the recapitalization for all periods presented. Accordingly, all of the outstanding shares of the acquired company's common stock at the completion date of the reverse merger transaction have been exchanged for the Company's common stock for all periods presented.
 
(2)  
Subsequent to the reverse merger –
   
(i)      
1,728,000 shares were issued as settlement of debt of $275,000;
(ii)       3,000,000 shares and an additional 1,065,226 shares under anti-dilutive provisions were issued for strategic business services rendered.
 
On December 29, 2011, the Company executed separate securities exchange agreements with thirteen certain non-related debenture holders regarding debentures owed by DEDC, a subsidiary of the Company, in the aggregate amount of $226,500, plus accrued interest of $45,300, for a total of $271,800. These debentures were acquired, as well as accrued interest due to the debenture holders in exchange for the private issuance to the thirteen debenture holders as a group of 1,494,909 shares of restricted common stock. The fair value of the share compensation was calculated as $179,389.

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued one warrant for the purchase of 1,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $160,000.  During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued a total of three warrants for the purchase of 2,500,000 shares of common stock with a total value of $300,000.  The following discusses the issuance of all warrants during the first six months of 2012:

(1)
On January 17, 2012, the Company issued a Warrant for the purchase of 1,000,000 Shares to TMDS, LLC ("TMDS"'), a company controlled by a director of the Company, as consideration for services rendered per a Contractor Agreement, dated July 9, 2011, and as further amended December 30, 2011.   TMDS receives a Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 Shares every ninety days during the term of the Contractor Agreement for a total of five (5) years. The Warrants are exercisable at $0.0001 per share, and have term expiring on the fifth anniversary date from the date of each issuance. A total of 25 million stock purchase warrants are issuable over the term of the agreement.  The fair value of the stock purchase warrants issued in the first quarter is $70,000, based on Black-Scholes option-pricing model using risk free interest rate of 0.79%, expected life of 5 years and expected volatility of 473.82%.
 
(2)
On March 17, 2012, the Company issued a Warrant for the purchase of 500,000 Shares, at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, with a term expiring on the fifth anniversary date from the date of issuance, to a departing Chief Financial Officer, who resigned effective March 14, 2012.  The fair value of these stock purchase warrants is $70,000, based on Black-Scholes option-pricing model using risk free interest rate of 1.13%, expected life of 5 years and expected volatility of 460.03%.

(3)
On April 17, 2012, the Company issued a Warrant for the purchase of 1,000,000 Shares to TMDS, LLC ("TMDS"'), a company controlled by a director of the Company, as consideration for services rendered per a Contractor Agreement, dated July 9, 2011, and as further amended December 30, 2011.   TMDS receives a Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 Shares every ninety days during the term of the Contractor Agreement for a total of five (5) years. The Warrants are exercisable at $0.0001 per share, and have term expiring on the fifth anniversary date from the date of each issuance. A total of 25 million stock purchase warrants are issuable over the term of the agreement.  The fair value of the stock purchase warrants issued in the second quarter is $160,000, based on Black-Scholes option-pricing model using risk free interest rate of 0.85%, expected life of 5 years and expected volatility of 481.39%.
 
 
19

 
 
Warrants outstanding at June 30, 2012 are as follows:
 
   
Outstanding Warrants
 
   
Number of
Shares
   
 Exercise
Price
   
Fair
Value
   
Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
   
Financing
Expense
 
Issued in 2011
                             
Issued July 9, 2011
    9,000,000     $ 0.0330     $ 0.107       4.02     $ 964,297  
Issued July 21, 2011
    3,000,000     $ 0.0001     $ 0.110       4.06          
Issued October 19, 2011
    3,000,000     $ 0.0001     $ 0.110       4.30 *   $ 659,755  
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
    15,000,000                                  
                                         
Issued in 2012
                                       
Issued January 17, 2012
    1,000,000     $ 0.0001     $ 0.070       4.55     $ 70,000  
Issued March 17, 2012
    500,000     $ 0.0010     $ 0.140       4.72     $ 70,000  
Issued April 16, 2012
    1,000,000     $ 0.0001     $ 0.160       4.80     $ 160,000  
     Issued in 2012
    2,500,000                             $ 300,000  
Outstanding at June 30, 2012
    17,500,000                             $ 300,000  
 
* Includes warrants issued July 21,2011.
 
Warrants outstanding and currently exercisable at June 30, 2012 are as follows:
 
   
Warrants Outstanding
   
Warrants Exercisable
 
   
Outstanding
   
Remaining Life
(Years)
   
Exercise
Price
   
 
Outstanding
       
                                         
Issued July 9, 2011
    9,000,000       4.02     $ 0.0330       3,000,000     $ 0.0330  
Issued July 21, 2011
    3,000,000       4.06     $ 0.0001       3,000,000     $ 0.0001  
Issued October 19, 2011
    3,000,000       4.30     $ 0.0001       3,000,000     $ 0.0001  
Issued January 17, 2012
    1,000,000       4.55     $ 0.0001       1,000,000     $ 0.0001  
Issued March 17, 2012
    500,000       4.72     $ 0.0010       -     $ 0.0001  
Issued April 16, 2012
    1,000,000       4.80     $ 0.0001       1,000,000     $ 0.0001  
      17,500,000                       11,000,000          
 
 
20

 
 
Note 8. 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
 
a)  
Strategic Business and Legal Services Agreement
 
On April 25, 2011 the Company entered into an agreement with NBN Enterprises, Inc. (“NBN”), through to May 1, 2013, whereby NBN provides strategic business services to the Company and pays the cost of outside legal counsel who will advise the Company on securities, corporate and contract matters.  The agreement provides for compensation to NBN in the form of issuance of restricted Company common stock equal to 5% of outstanding shares, with anti-dilution protection through the issuance of additional shares through the term and for the succeeding 12 months, and a non-accountable expense allowance of $3,500 per month.  During the first six months of 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred legal expenses of $21,000 and $0, respectively, under this agreement and remains obligated to issue 1,065,226 shares of common stock pursuant to the original terms of the agreement.
 
b)  
Line of Credit
 
On July 9, 2011, the Company established a revolving line of credit bearing interest at 15% per annum, with Charles R. Cronin, a director of the Company, (the “Lender”), with advances to be requested in writing by Company on dates and in amounts up to the credit limit, and in the case of each advance, to be made only upon approval the Lender. On September 11, 2011 and October 5, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved and the Company executed approvals of credit limit amendments to increase the Company’s outstanding line of credit to $300,000.
 
On June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011 the Company owed the Lender $110,582 and $89,584, respectively. During the first six months of 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded interest expense of $21,787 and $0, respectively, related to the line of credit.
 
c)
Consulting Agreement – Key Services, Inc.
 
On July 9, 2011, the Company executed a consulting agreement with Key Services, Inc. (“Key”), whereby Key will locate and assist in the Company’s development and construction of an energy campus project to be undertaken by the Company in the future.  The Consulting Agreement is non-exclusive and runs for a period of five years. As consideration, the Company has agreed to pay compensation to Key in the form of cash in an amount equal to $20,000 per month or at the Company’s option (if funds are not available), restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at the average closing price of Company’s common stock over the preceding 20 trading days. In addition, Key is entitled to additional fees, including but not limited to, joint venture, partnership, consulting, developer, contractor and/or project management fees, to be negotiated separately, and agreed to in writing on a project-by-project basis.
 
On June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company owed  Key $101,863 and $46,863, respectively. During the first six months of 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded consulting expenses of $120,000 and $0, respectively.

In July 2012, the consulting services agreement was terminated and the accounts payable balance at June 30, 2012 was settled in full.  See Note 11. Subsequent Events for discussion.
 
 
21

 
 
d)
Consulting Agreement – TMDS, LLC
 
On July 9, 2011, as amended December 30, 2011, Company executed a consulting agreement with TMDS, LLC (“TMDS”), whereby TMDS will locate and assist in the Company’s development and construction of energy campus projects to be undertaken by the Company in the future.  The consulting agreement is non-exclusive and runs for a period of five years. As consideration, the Company has agreed to pay compensation to TMDS in the form of one or more Warrants for the purchase of 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (“Shares”) every 90 days, exercisable at $0.0001 per share, with an exercise term of five (5) years from the date of each issuance.  In addition, TMDS is entitled to additional fees, including but not limited to, joint venture, partnership, consulting, developer, contractor and/or project management fees, to be negotiated separately, and agreed to in writing on a project-by-project basis.
 
During the first six months  of 2012, the Company issued two Warrants totaling 2,000,000 Shares  (1,000,000 Shares each quarter) with a total value of $230,000 (first quarter value of $70,000 and second quarter value of $160,000) to TMDS under this agreement.  (See Note 8.)
 
e)
Consulting Agreement – Investor and Broker Dealer Relations and Financing Alternatives
 
On March 14, 2012, the Company executed a consulting agreement with Undiscovered Equities, Inc. (“UEI”), pursuant to which UEI has agreed to provide various consulting services, including retention and supervision of various public relations services and investor relations services, strategic business planning, broker dealer relations, financing alternatives and sources, and due diligence meetings for the investor community.  The agreement has a 6 month term, but may be terminated early after 60 days, and provides for the Company to pay consulting fees as follows: (i) the sum of $25,000 per month over the term of the agreement (the “Cash Payments”) and (ii) a signing bonus in the form of immediate issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s restricted Common stock (the “Stock Payments”), which was issued March 19, 2012. On May 3, 2012, the Company and UEI executed a letter of execution (the “Letter of Extension”) of the consulting agreement to extend the payment terms of Cash Payments and Stock Payments from the May 7, 2012 to June 15, 2012. On August 15, 2012, the Company and UEI executed an Amendment No. 1 to the consulting agreement to extend the payment terms of Cash Payments and Stock Payments from the June 15, 2012 to September 1, 2012. The shares will be issued on the revised payment date.

f)
Stock Purchase Agreement – C.C. Crawford Retreading Company, Inc.
 
On March 20, 2012, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, DEDC, entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with C.C. Crawford Tire Company, Inc. (the “Seller”), pursuant to which DEDC agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of C.C. Crawford Retreading Company, Inc., a Texas corporation (“CTR”), for an aggregate purchase price of $600,000 in cash, due and payable upon the date of closing, on or before April 20, 2012, subject to the completion of certain closing conditions precedent, to be performed by both the Seller and DEDC.

On June 1, 2012, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, DEDC, entered into an assignment and assumption agreement (“Assignment Agreement”) with IWSI PS Plan, an entity controlled by  Charles R. Cronin, a shareholder and director of the Company,  and the Seller pursuant to which DEDC assigned its rights to acquire CTR to IWSI PS Plan.  The Company is currently negotiating an option with IWSI  PS plan for the purchase of CTR.  The price and terms for such option are uncertain at this time.
 
 
22

 

g)
License and Assignment Agreement – R.F.B., LLC
 
On May 23, 2012, Dynamic Energy IP, LLC, a Delaware corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Dynamic Energy Alliance Corporation, a Florida corporation (“DEAC”), entered into a definitive agreement (the “Contract”) with R.F.B., LLC (“RFB”), pursuant to which RFB licensed and assigned to Dynamic Energy LP, a Non-Provisional Patent Application (the “Application”), and the World Wide exclusive right, license and privilege of utilizing certain RFB technology and expertise. In consideration, the Company has an obligation to issue RFB 100,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common when RFB completes certain provisions of the Contract, which is anticipated to occur during the third quarter of 2012.  Further the Contract provides for payment by the Company to RFB of specified license fees based on both gallons of high value organics produced utilizing the RFB technology, and a formula percentage of net profits realized from the recovery of all energy products from oil sands or tar sands over the term of the Contract by the Company (regardless of technology used) The Contract has a term of 25 years, or 20 years from the date of issuance of patents, whichever is shorter.

The RFB Technology consists of catalysts and reactor technology relating to recovery of high value organics from the processing of rubber and tires. The Company is entitled to utilize the RFB Technology in (a) the development and manufacture of goods and products; and (b) the design, construction and modification of plants (new and existing). Further, RFB will allow Dynamic Energy IP to sell to third parties (i) goods and products produced by utilization of RFB Technology; and (ii) plants utilizing RFB Technology.
 
h)
Consulting Agreement – Financing and Acquisitions Advisor
 
On June 1, 2012, the Company executed a corporate advisory agreement (“Agreement”) with Heartland Capital Markets, LLC (“Heartland”), pursuant to which Heartland agreed to provide various advisory services, including equity and/or debt financings, strategic planning, merger and acquisition possibilities and business development activities that include various investor relations services, strategic business planning, broker dealer relations, financing alternatives and sources, and due diligence meetings for the investor community.  The agreement has a three month term which is renewable for additional three month periods, and provides for the Company to pay an advisory fee of two hundred and fifty thousand (250,000) restricted shares of the Company’s restricted common stock (“Stock”).  The advisory fee is considered fully earned pro rata over the course of the term of the agreement and due to Heartland at the execution of the agreement.  On August 17, 2012, the Agreement was amended  to change the date that the advisory fee was fully earned to the date  that Heartland was issued the Stock.  The Company issued the Stock on August 8, 2012.
 
Note 9.
INCOME TAXES

Potential benefits of income tax losses and other tax assets are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has net operating losses carried forward of $1,234,952 (December 31, 2011 – $1,022,465) for tax purposes in various jurisdictions subject to expiration as described below. Pursuant to ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward and other items giving rise to deferred tax assets. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses and other items have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these items.
 
 
23

 
 
The actual income tax provisions differ from the expected amounts calculated by applying the combined income tax statutory rates applicable in each jurisdiction to the Company’s loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest. The components of these differences are as follows:
 
   
As of  June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
             
Corporate income tax rate
    34 %     34 %
                 
Expected income tax (recovery)
  $ (174,245 )   $ 506,320  
Non-deductible finance costs and other
    102,000       -  
Change in valuation allowance
    72,245       -  
                 
Income tax provision
  $ -     $ 506,320  
 
The Company’s tax-effected deferred income tax assets and liabilities are estimated as follows:
 
   
June 30,
2012
   
December 31,
2011
 
                 
Net operating loss carryforward
  $ 419,884     $ 347,638  
Total deferred tax assets
    419,884       347,368  
Less: Valuation allowance
    (419,884 )     (347,368  
                 
Net deferred tax assets recognized
  $ -     $ -  
 
The Company has approximately $1,234,952 in net operating losses carried forward for United States income tax purposes which will expire, if not utilized, in 2030. 
 
 
24

 
 
Note 10.
SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company follows FASB ASC 280, Segment Reporting, and currently has two reportable segments as follows:
 
a)  
Consulting  Services

Through its wholly owned subsidiary TC, the Company receives revenues from a related party based on billings received from certain of its direct to consumer membership club products after merger on March 9, 2011.  During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, TC gross revenues totaled $103,776 and $1,493,342, respectively, and during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, TC gross revenues totaled $405,479 and $1,493,342, respectively.
 
b)  
Recoverable Energy

Through its wholly owned subsidiary DEDC, the Company’s energy sector involves a plan for commencement of a business to develop, commercialize, and sell innovative technologies in the recoverable energy industry.
 
Financial information for each segment is presented in the following table. The accounting policies of each reportable segment are the same as those of the consolidated company, as described in Note 5, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Operating income (loss)
 
 
                   
   Consulting services
  $ 34,990     $ 1,490,054     $ 280,651     $ 1,490,054  
   Recoverable energy
    (317,302 )     (222,662 )     (771,351 )     (691,634 )
Total
  $ (268,939 )   $ 1,267,392     $ (490,700 )   $ 798,420  
 
Note 11.  
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

a)
Consulting Agreement – Key Services, Inc. – Addendum No. 1 to Consulting Agreement

On July 10 of last year (2011), the Company executed a five-year non-exclusive consulting agreement with Key Services, Inc. (“Consultant”), whereby Consultant agreed to locate and assist in the Company’s development and construction of future energy campus projects. The Company agreed to pay compensation to Consultant in the form of cash in an amount equal to $20,000 per month or at the Company’s option (if funds were not available), restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at the average closing price of Company’s common stock over the preceding 20 trading days. The Consulting Agreement also provided that Consultant would be entitled to additional fees, including but not limited to, joint venture, partnership, consulting, developer, contractor and/or project arrangement fees, in amounts and in a form to be negotiated separately, and agreed to in writing on a project-by-project basis by both parties. As of July 18, 2012, there had accrued, but remained unpaid and owing to Consultant, a total of $121,863 in consulting fees due under this Consulting Agreement.
 
 
25

 

On July 18, 2012, Dynamic Energy Alliance Corporation, a Florida corporation (“The Company”) executed an Addendum No. 1 to said Consulting Agreement (the “Addendum”), which substantially changed the terms for compensation under the Consulting Agreement, and made certain other changes, as follows:

(a)  
The Company agreed to settle in full the past due and outstanding obligation for prior consulting fees to the Consultant which aggregated $121,863, at July 18, 2012, by the immediate private issuance of 609,315 shares of the Company’s restricted Common. Stock to Consultant.

(b)  
The Consultant agreed to execute a separate Lock-up Agreement restricting the re sale of the above referenced Shares for a period of twelve (12) months after the date of expiration of the customary SEC Rule 144 restriction period (normally 6 months).

(c)  
The Company and Consultant agreed to terminate payment of a $20,000 monthly consulting fee during the remaining term of the Consulting Agreement, beginning July 1, 2012.

(d)  
Reaffirmed the Parties agreement that the Company would pay Consultant additional fees to be separately negotiated, including site development, joint venture, partnership, consulting, developer, contractor and/or project management fees, on a project by project basis.
 
(e)  
Provided that the Company has the right to assign its obligations under the Consulting Agreement to one or more wholly owned subsidiaries or related party entities. The Amendment contains customary warranties and representations and indemnification and confidentiality provisions and provides that the Consultant is subject to noncompetition and noninterference covenants.

b)
Consulting Agreement – Investor and Broker Dealer Relations and Financing Alternatives – Amendment No. 1

On August 15, 2012, the Company and Undiscovered Equities Inc. (“Consultant”), executed Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting Agreement (“Amendment”) to the original consulting agreement dated March 14, 2012 (“Consulting Agreement”), whereby the commencement date for the services to be provided by Consultant, including the obligation of the Company to pay the monthly compensation to Consultant, was amended to reflect a commencement date of September 1, 2012 instead of June 15, 2012, superseding the terms and conditions of the Letter of Extension, as previously disclosed in herein (see Note 9(e)).

c)
Consulting Agreement – Financing and Acquisitions Advisor

On August 17, 2012, the Company and Heartland Capital Markets, LLC (“Heartland”), executed an Amendment to the Original Agreement (“Amendment”), dated June 1, 3012, whereby the commencement date for the services to be provided by Heartland was changed to September 1, 2012.  Further, the Amendment changed  the date that the advisory fee consisting of 250,000 restricted shares of the Company’s restricted common stock (“Stock”) was considered fully earned to the date that Heartland was issued the Stock.  The Company issued the Stock on August 8, 2012.
 
 
26

 
 
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
 
Basis of Presentation

The following management’s discussion and analysis is intended to provide additional information regarding the significant changes and trends which influenced our financial performance for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes as set forth in this report.

Overview
 
The Company’s business plan is focused on developing and implementing recoverable energy technologies. DEDC, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, is currently seeking to locate joint venture partners or other financing partners (hereinafter collectively “joint venture partners”), on a project by project basis, for the purpose of development, construction and operation of free standing plants which provide full cycle processing to convert discarded tires into shelf ready, salable fuel and carbon products (hereinafter referred to as “plants”).  Although, the Company has identified various plant locations and potential joint venture opportunities, as of today, it has not executed any agreements for the development of a plant.

The Company proposes to develop a full cycle process plant for converting discarded tires to salable fuel and carbon products. To accomplish this plan and other milestones, management intends to secure one or more partnerships, on a site-by-site basis, with local joint venture partners and/or financing sources, including companies who produce shredded tire feedstock usable in the plants. The Company’s business plan anticipates the creation of a state-of-the-art production facility called the “Pyrol Black Energy Campus” in late 2012 and early 2013, as one of its initial milestones. Specifically, the Company plans to acquire, combine and optimize a variety of existing proven and potentially innovative “Renewable Energy” technologies currently available in the market.  Once a demonstration plant has been completed and is in operation, the Company’s plan includes the development of similar freestanding facilities at different US locations (and, possibly other global markets).   Creation of such an initial plant requires obtaining a location that has a dependable supply of waste feed stock for the plant, obtaining the necessary capital to develop, construct and set in operation the plant (likely with local joint venture partners and/or other financing sources), and establishment of markets for the resale of resulting products.  The Company will seek to partner with other companies who can provide tire feedstock, land for a plant, and/or capital, on a joint venture basis.  As of this date, the Company has identified a location in Ennis, Texas as a potential site upon which it could develop its first Energy Campus, and has announced its intention to purchase such site, pending the completion of favorable due diligence and the obtaining of the necessary capital required to proceed, the source for which is uncertain at this date.

Requirements and Utilization of Funds

To implement our plan of operations, including some or all of the above described milestones (objectives), we will need to continue to raise capital (“equity”) in an amount between $2.5 and $5.0 million in equity from restricted stock sales or other acceptable financing options over the next 6-12 month period beginning in the second quarter of 2012 on terms and conditions to be determined. Management may elect to seek subsequent interim or “bridge” financing in the form of debt (corporate loans) as may be necessary.
 
 
27

 
 
We anticipate the need to raise additional capital beyond the first 6 months of operations, subject to the successful implementation of our initial milestones over the first 180 days of operations and our revenue growth cycle thereafter. At this time, management is unable to determine the specific amounts and terms of such future financings.
 
We foresee the proceeds from capital raised to be allocated as follows: (a) consolidation and integration; (b) growth capital; (c) research and due diligence; (d) pre-development plant costs; (e) product enhancements and technology partners; (f) new business development; (g) legal, audit, SEC filings and compliance fees; (h) financing costs; (i) working capital (general and administrative); (j) reserve capital for costs of acquisition and market expansion.
 
At such time as these funds are required, management would evaluate the terms of such debt financing and determine whether the business could sustain operations and growth and manage the debt load.  To date management has not identified the source for such additional capital, and whether the Company will be able to raise sufficient capital, and do so on commercially reasonable terms, in uncertain. If we cannot raise additional proceeds via a private placement of our common stock or secure debt financing we would be required to cease business operations. As a result, investors in our common stock would lose all of their investment.
 
Management has plans for the staged development of our business over the next twelve months. Other than engaging and/or retaining independent consultants to assist the Company in various administrative and marketing related needs, we do not anticipate a significant change in the number of our employees, if any, unless we are able to obtain adequate financing.

In our recently file Form 10-K/A, our auditors have issued a “going concern” opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our expenses. This is because we have not generated enough revenues and no substantial revenues are anticipated in the near-term. Accordingly, we must seek to raise cash from sources other than from the sale of our products.

Results from Operations

Our operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Revenue
  $ 103,776     $ 1,493,342     $ 405,479     $ 1,493,342  
Operating expenses
    372,714       225,950       896,179       694,922  
Net operating loss
  $ (268,938 )   $ 1,267,392     $ (490,700 )   $ 798,420  
  
Revenue represents TC commission revenues earned after Merger on March 9, 2011, from a management service agreement that the TC had in place prior to the merger.   The decrease in 2012 is primarily due to the decrease in new business activity since the business was acquired in 2011.
 
 
28

 
  
Operating Expenses
 
Our expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are outlined in the table below:

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Project development costs
  $ 31,593     $ -     $ 180,984     $ 15,210  
Consulting services
    155,500       68,078       411,000       446,078  
General and administrative expenses
    185,621       157,872       304,195       233,634  
Total Expenses
  $ 372,714     $ 225,950     $ 896,179     $ 694,922  
 
There was no project development activity during the three months ended June 30, 2011.  The increase in consulting services during the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the second quarter of 2011 is primarily due to a Warrant issued under a consulting agreement that took effect in the third quarter of 2011.  The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2012 is primarily related to increase in public company related costs, such as accounting, auditing, legal and investor related activities.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2012, we had cash of $570 and our working capital deficit is $1,512,448.  During the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, we generated revenues of $405,479 and have a net loss of $512,487.  As of June 30, 2012, we have a cumulative net loss of $5,458,096.   We are illiquid and need cash infusions from investors and/or current shareholders to support our proposed marketing and sales operations.  
 
Working Capital
 
   
As of
June 30,
2012
   
As of
December 31,
2011
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
             
Current assets
  $ 1,253     $ 7,652  
Current liabilities
    1,513,701       1,307,613  
Working capital deficit
  $ (1,512,448 )   $ (1,299,961 )
 
 
29

 
 
Cash Flows
 
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2012
   
2012
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ (26,612 )   $ 1,232,615  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    19,530       (1,235,977 )
Net decrease in cash
  $ (7,082 )   $ (3,362 )
 
Cash From Operating Activities
 
Cash used in operating activities of $26,612 in the six months ended June 30, 2012 is primarily due to net operating loss of $512,487, offset by non-cash warrants issued for services in the same period of $300,000 and an increase in accounts payable of $177,560.  Cash provided by operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to pre-tax income of $798,420 and non-cash warrants issued for services of $548,000.

Cash From Financing Activities
 
Cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2012 is primarily due to $19,530 cash received from contingent consideration. Cash used in financing activities in 2011 is primarily due to cash payments towards contingent consideration of $1,431,768.
 
Going Concern Uncertainties
 
Management believes that our current financial condition, liquidity and capital resources may not satisfy our cash requirements for the next 12 months and as such we will need to either raise additional proceeds and/or our officers and/or directors will need to make additional financial commitments to our company, neither of which is guaranteed. We plan to satisfy our future cash requirements, primarily the working capital required to execute on our objectives, including marketing and sales of our product, and legal and accounting fees, through financial commitments from future debt/equity financings, if and when possible.
 
Management believes that we may generate more sales revenue within the next twelve (12) months, but that these sales revenues will not satisfy our cash requirements to implement the first 6-12 months of our business plan, including, but not limited to, project acquisitions, engineering, and integration costs, and other operating expenses and corporate overhead (which is subject to change depending upon pending business opportunities and available financing).
 
We have no committed source for funds as of this date. No representation is made that any funds will be available when needed. In the event that funds cannot be raised when needed, we may not be able to carry out our business plan, may never achieve sales, and could fail to satisfy our future cash requirements as a result of these uncertainties.
 
If we are unsuccessful in raising the additional proceeds from officers and/or directors, we may then have to seek additional funds through debt financing, which would be extremely difficult for an early stage company to secure and may not be available to us. However, if such financing is available, we would likely have to pay additional costs associated with high-risk loans and be subject to above market interest rates.
 
 
30

 
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operation, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is deemed by our management to be material to investors.
 
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
 
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1), we are not required to provide the information required by this Item 3.
 
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), for the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective in all material respects, including those to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
 
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, there had been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
31

 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
 
We are not currently a party to any material, pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our business.
 
ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS
 
The following important factors, and the important factors described elsewhere in this report or in our other filings with the SEC, could affect (and in some cases have affected) our results and could cause our results to be materially different from estimates or expectations.  Other risks and uncertainties may also affect our results or operations adversely.  The following and these other risks could materially and adversely affect our business, operations, results or financial condition.
 
An investment in the Company is highly speculative in nature and involves an extremely high degree of risk. A prospective investor should consider the possibility of the loss of the investor's entire investment and evaluate all information about us and the risk factors discussed below in relation to his financial circumstances before investing in us. 

Risks Related to the Business and Financial Condition

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.”  Accordingly, there is significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our business began recording revenues in first quarter 2011.  As of June 30, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of $5,458,096 and cash on hand of $570. A significant amount of capital will be necessary to initiate our business plan to the point where we have one or more plants up and operating which are commercially viable.  The source and availability of such capital is uncertain, and we may be unable to obtain such capital, or obtain it on commercially reasonable terms.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

If we continue incurring losses, fail to achieve profitability, or are unable to locate additional capital on commercially reasonable terms to implement our business plans, we may have to cease activities. Our financial condition raises substantial doubt that we will be able to operate as a “going concern”, and our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding this uncertainty in their report on our financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.  These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty as to whether we will achieve status as a “going concern”. Our ability to achieve status as a “going concern” is dependent upon our generating cash flow sufficient to fund operations.  Our business plans may not be successful in addressing these issues.  If we cannot achieve status as a “going concern”, you may lose your entire investment in the Company.
 
 
32

 

We are currently dependent on external financing, the source of which is uncertain
 
Currently, we are dependent upon external financing to fund implementation of our business plan. We estimate that within the next 12 months we will need $2,500,000 to implement the first 6-12 months of our business plan, including, but not limited to, project acquisitions, engineering, and development and integration costs, and other operating expenses and corporate overhead (which is subject to change depending upon pending business opportunities and available financing).  We will also need to negotiate, joint venture arrangements and/or other financing arrangements to provide capital for development, construction and initial operation of our first plant, which we estimate will cost approximately $15,000,000 to build out and establish commercial operations. We do not have such capital available at this date. It is imperative that we receive this external financing to implement our business plan and to finance startup operations. New capital may not be available, adequate funds may not be sufficient to implement our business plan, or capital may not be available when needed or on commercially reasonable terms.  Our failure to obtain adequate additional financing would require us to delay, curtail or scale back some or all of our efforts to implement our business plan and could jeopardize our ability to continue in business.

We may not be able to establish joint venture or financing arrangements, obtain the capital to market our technology, or otherwise successfully operate our business.
 
We believe that part of the key to establishing revenues is to successfully establish joint venture or financing arrangements with local joint venture partners, and/or other local financing sources, and with public and private entities who have the need to dispose of waste products which will serve as the feedstock for operation of our Energy Campuses tm. We have not as yet negotiated such joint ventures or arrangements, and our ability to do so, and do so on favorable terms to our proposed business is uncertain. Our success in this regard will depend in large part on how our technology works, market acceptance of our proposed technology and our efforts to educate potential joint venture and financing partners on the advantages of teaming with us to develop, build out and operate our proposed plants. Acceptance of such proposals requires marketing expenditures and education and awareness on the part of potential joint venture partners who might serve as partners in our development of plants. We may not have the resources required to promote our technology, or to promote proposals to develop plants and to promote their potential benefits. Such efforts will require additional capital, and the availability, sources and terms for such capital are uncertain. If we are unable to obtain the necessary capital, or unable to successfully promote our technology and/or proposed plant development, or unable to develop profitable joint venture arrangements with producers of waste feed stock, we will be unable to implement our business plan or continue in business.
 
We have limited operating history and may be unsuccessful in our efforts to implement our expanded business plan.
 
We have limited history of revenues from operations. We have yet to generate positive earnings and there can be no assurance that we will ultimately establish profitable operations.  Our business plan is subject to all the risks inherent associated with project development, financing and implementation. We may be unable to locate sites, locate joint venture and/or financial partners, locate the required additional capital, our technology may not work as anticipated, we may find it difficult to obtain waste feed stock at reasonable prices, our end products may not find market acceptance, and/or we may fail to operate on a profitable basis. Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered in commercializing our technology and plan proposals. If the business plan is not successful and we are not able to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment.
 
 
33

 
 
If we are unable to obtain additional funding, business operations will be harmed and if we do obtain additional financing then existing shareholders may suffer substantial dilution.
 
We anticipate that we will require up to approximately $2,500,000 to fund continued operations for the next twelve months, depending on revenue, if any, from operations.  Additional capital will be required to effectively support the operations and to otherwise implement an overall business strategy.  This is in addition to substantial additional capital we are proposing to raise from local joint venture partners and other financing participants on a project-by-project basis.  We currently do not have any contracts or commitments for additional financing or for plant project joint ventures..  There can be no assurance that financing will be available in required amounts or on commercially reasonable terms. The inability to obtain additional capital will restrict our ability to implement our business plan.  If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we will likely be required to cease activities. Any additional equity financing which involves the sale of our corporate securities may involve substantial dilution to then existing shareholders, while participation arrangements in joint ventures and other arrangements will dilute the ownership interest in, and profit potential of each plant, since the ownership and fruits of plant operation will have to be shared among participating capital sources.

Because we are small and do not have much capital, we may have to limit marketing activity which may result in a loss of your investment.
 
Because we are small and do not have much capital, we must limit our business activity. As such we may not be able to complete the sales and marketing efforts required to create opportunities and then enter into joint venture arrangements to develop, construct and operate plants. If we cannot successfully negotiate and enter into contracts for the development, construction and operation of plants, either in joint venture form, or though financing arrangements, then the Company will not be successful and you will lose your investment.
 
If we are unable to continue to retain the services of our current executive personnel and key consultants, or if we are unable to successfully recruit qualified managerial and company personnel having experience in our renewable energy industry, it would be detrimental to our business.
 
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued services of our current executive personnel and key consultants, including specifically James Michael Whitfield, Charles R. Cronin, Jr. and Tracy Williams. The loss of the services of any of these key persons could have a material adverse effect on our growth, revenues, and prospective business. None of these individuals currently have employment agreements and they could leave us with little or no prior notice. We do not have “key person” life insurance policies covering any of our employees. Additionally, there are a limited number of qualified technical personnel with significant experience in the design, development, manufacture, and sale of our recoverable energy, and we may face challenges hiring and retaining these types of employees.
 
In order to successfully implement and manage our business plan, we will be dependent upon, among other things, successfully retaining and recruiting qualified managerial and company personnel having experience in our recoverable energy business. Competition for qualified individuals is intense. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find, attract and retain existing employees or that we will be able to find, attract and retain qualified personnel on acceptable terms.
 
 
34

 
 
We are a new entrant into the “Renewable Energy” industry without profitable operating history.
 
As of June 30, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of $5,458,096.  We expect to derive our future revenues by implementation of our business plan, which contemplates establishment of joint ventures and other financing arrangements for the development, construction and operation of plants, and the sales of our systems.  Success in implementing this business plan and thereby generating   revenues is highly uncertain.  We expect to continue to devote available resources to implement our business plan.  As a result, we expect that our operating losses will increase and that we may incur operating losses for the foreseeable future.
 
We may not be successful in our efforts to build and profitably operate production facilities, with the result that we will be able to generate enough future revenues to achieve or sustain profitability.
 
We are dependent on the successful execution of acquiring, combining and maximizing a variety of existing, proven and unproven but innovative “Recoverable Energy” technologies which we plan to build and to use in operation of what management believes will be profitable production facilities (“Energy Campuses TM”). The market for our concept of combining technologies is unproven, and certain of the technologies are unproven as well.  The technology may not work, or may not work properly in conjunction with other technologies, or may not gain adequate commercial acceptance.  Thus, there is no assurance that our business plan will succeed.

If We Do Not Obtain And Maintain Necessary Domestic Regulatory Registrations, Approvals And Comply With Ongoing Regulations, We May Not Be Able To Develop, Construct or Operate Our Energy Campuses.
 
The Energy Campuses we propose to develop, construct and operate, will be subject to extensive Federal, State and Local laws and regulations.  Compliance with such laws and regulations may involve the submission of a substantial volume of data and may require lengthy substantive review. This will increase costs and could reduce profitability. We may not be able to comply with future regulatory requirements. Moreover, the cost of compliance with government regulations may adversely affect revenue and profitability on a continuing basis once we have established plants, which are operating.  Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, in injunctions, operating restrictions,  civil fines and criminal prosecution. Delays or failure to obtain registrations could have a material adverse effect on the marketing and sales of services and impair the ability to operate profitably in the future.
 
Because Our Industry Is Subject To Rapid Technological Changes And New Developments, Our Future Success Will Depend On Our Ability To Respond To The Changes And Keep Out Technology updated.
 
The creation of plants and technology utilized to convert waste materials to energy and other usable products is a relatively new technology and is subject to potentially revolutionary technological changes and new developments. Future technological developments could render the plants we propose to build and operate, and/or the equipment therein, obsolete. Future success will depend largely on our ability to anticipate or adapt to such changes in the development, operation and subsequent adaption of our plants.
 
 
35

 
 
Our Markets Are Increasingly Competitive And, In The Event We Are Unable To Compete Against Larger Competitors, Our Business Could Be Adversely Affected.
 
The conversion of waste products and materials to energy and alternative new products is becoming an increasingly competitive business. We will compete against several companies seeking to address the conversion of low cost scrap tires into renewable fuel and consumer products. Competitors with greater access to financial resources may enter our proposed markets and compete with us. Many of our competitors will have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, longer relationships with clients, and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and public relations resources than we do. We do not have any research and development underway, relying instead on a combination of current state of the art technology for the initial plants we propose to develop, build and operate, while other competitors have established budgets for such R&D. Established competitors, who have substantially greater financial resources and longer operating histories than us, are able to engage in more substantial marketing and promotion and attract a greater number of joint venture opportunities for the development, construction and operation of plants.  In the event that we are not able to compete successfully, our business will be adversely affected and competition may make it more difficult for us to raise capital, establish joint ventures for plant development and implement our business plan.
 
The Company’s Implementation of Its Plan May Be impacted by the health and stability of the general economy.

Unfavorable changes in general economic conditions, such as the current recession, or economic slowdown in the geographic markets in which the Company seeks to establish business may have the effect of making it difficult to raise the required additional capital, or to locate potential joint venture partners which serve as a key part of our business plan.  Markets for our anticipated by products may disappear, or prices may fall.  These factors could adversely affect the Company’s implementation of its business plan and the ultimate establishment of profitable operations.

Failure to establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
 
Maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and is important in helping to prevent financial fraud.  If we are unable to maintain adequate internal controls, our business and operating results could be harmed.
 
Risks Related to Common Stock
 
Additional financings may dilute the holdings of our current shareholders.
 
In order to provide capital for the operation of the business, we may enter into additional financing arrangements. These arrangements may involve the issuance of new shares of common stock, preferred stock that is convertible into common stock, debt securities that are convertible into common stock or warrants for the purchase of common stock. Any of these items could result in a material increase in the number of shares of common stock outstanding, which would in turn result in a dilution of the ownership interests of existing common shareholders. In addition, these new securities could contain provisions, such as priorities on distributions and voting rights, which could affect the value of our existing common stock.
 
There is currently a limited public market for our common stock.  Failure to develop or maintain a trading market could negatively affect its value and make it difficult or impossible for you to sell your shares.
 
There has been a limited public market for our common stock and an active public market for our common stock may not develop.  Failure to develop or maintain an active trading market could make it difficult for you to sell your shares or recover any part of your investment in us.  Even if a market for our common stock does develop, the market price of our common stock may be highly volatile.  In addition to the uncertainties relating to future operating performance and the profitability of operations, factors such as variations in interim financial results or various, as yet unpredictable, factors, many of which are beyond our control, may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
 
 
36

 
 
Risks Associated with Control of Our Company through Outstanding Preferred Stock.

Our Capital Structure as currently evolved places effective control of Certain Significant Decisions in the hands of four Series A Convertible Preferred Shareholders

We currently have outstanding 7,732,824 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which is held by four shareholders as follows (hereinafter the “Series A Shareholders”):
 
Charles R. Cronin
4,425,000 Shares
James Michael Whitfield
1,417,824 Shares
Harvey Dale Cheek
1,665,000 Shares
Dr. Earl Beaver
225,000 Shares
 
The Certificate of Designation for these shares provides among other rights and privileges the requirement that 75% of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred must give their prior consent, before the Company can elect members to the Board of Directors, issue any securities of the Company or affect any fundamental transaction  (defined as acquisitions, mergers, sale or purchase of substantially all assets, etc.).

As a result, the Company’s Board of Directors cannot act to issue additional securities to raise capital or for other purposes, nor may the common shareholders remove, replace or re-elect directors to the Board of Directors, nor may the Company affect any acquisitions, without the approval of at least 75% of its outstanding Series A Preferred Stock.

Series A Shareholders may have interests or goals different from, or even adverse to the interests of the Company and its business in some circumstances. As a result the Company may find it difficult or impossible to obtain such consent from the Series A Shareholders, should it need to raise capital by the sale of securities, or undertake one of the other specified actions.  Common shareholders may be essentially blocked under these provisions from changing the members of the Board of Directors, despite the fact that Directors may not be performing their duties in an adequate manner in the view of a majority of the common shareholders. These provisions preclude or discourage outside take over or sale of the Company or its assets, unless approved by 75% of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Shares.  There may be potentially other adverse consequences arising from these restrictions on the Company and its Board of Directors.

Trading of our stock is restricted by the Securities Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations, may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.
 
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth exclusive of home in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.
 
 
37

 
 
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
 
As part of the merger (acquisition) transaction completed on March 16, 2009, we issued 17,622,692 shares of the common stock of the Company, $.0001 par value per share, to the shareholders of Dynamic Energy Development Corporation in a share exchange on a one for one basis. Subsequently, Verdad Telecom returned 44,786,188 shares of common stock in the Company, $.0001 par value per share, in exchange for a cash payment of $322,000 (the “Purchase Price”). This transaction closed on March 10, 2011. The shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act.
 
Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers
 
None.
 
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
 
None.
 
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
 
N/A
 
 
38

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
 
Those exhibits marked with an asterisk (*) refer to exhibits filed herewith. The other exhibits are incorporated herein by reference, as indicated in the following list.

Exhibit Number
 
Description of Exhibit
     
3.1
 
Articles of Incorporation
3.2
 
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
3.3
 
By-Laws
3.4
 
Amendments to By-Laws
10.1
 
Share Exchange Agreement dated March 9, 2011, by and among Dynamic Energy Development Corporation, Mammatech Corporation and Verdad Telecom (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 16, 2010).
10.2
 
Share Purchase Agreement Dated July 9, 2010 by and between the Company and Verdad Telecom, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 14, 2010)
10.3
 
Amendment to Share Purchase Agreement Dated July 23, 2010 by and between the Company and Verdad Telecom, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 27, 2010)
10.4
 
Strategic Consulting Services Agreement with NBN Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated July 22, 2011)
10.5
 
Consulting Agreement with TMDS, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated July 22, 2011)
10.6
 
Consulting Agreement with Key Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated July 22, 2011)
10.7
 
Line of Credit with Charles R. Cronin, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated July 22, 2011)
10.8
 
Stock Warrant Agreement with Charles R. Cronin, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated July 22, 2011)
10.9
 
Consulting Agreement with Enertech R.D., LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 21, 2011)
10.10
 
Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 21, 2011)
10.11
 
Line of Credit – Amendment #1 and Amendment #2 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated November 21, 2011)
10.12  
 
Securities Exchange Agreements with thirteen debenture holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated January 6, 2012)
10.13  
 
Consulting Agreement with Undiscovered Equities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 19, 2012)
10.14  
 
Stock Purchase Warrant to Pamela Griffin, the Company’s former CFO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 19, 2012)
10.15  
 
Stock Purchase Agreement with C.C. Crawford Tire Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 21, 2012)
10.16  
Term Sheet with R.F.B., LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated April 5, 2012)
10.17    
Definitive Agreement – R.F.B., LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated May 24, 2012)
10.18  
Amendment No.1 to the Project Location and Consulting Agreement and Mutual Indemnification and Release Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.01 of the Company's Form 8-K dated July 31, 2012)
10.19  
Amendment No.1 to the Consulting Agreement – Undiscovered Equities Inc., dated August 15, 2012 (incorporated by reference herein)
10.20
 
Amendment No.1 to Corporate Advisory Agreement - Heartland Capital Markets, LLC, dated August 17, 2012 (incorporated by reference herein)
21.1
 
List of Subsidiaries
99.1
 
Audited financial statements of DYNAMIC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 16, 2011).
99.2
 
Audited financial statements of TC for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 16, 2011).
101**
 
Interactive Data File (Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 furnished in XBRL).
31.1*
 
Certification of the registrant's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
31.2*
 
Certification of the registrant's Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1*
 
Certification of the Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.2*
 
Certification of the Company's Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
___________
* In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.
** The Company will furnish Exhibit 101 within 30 days of the filing date of this Report, as permitted under the rules of the SEC.
 
 
39

 
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
DYNAMIC ENERGY ALLIANCE CORPORATION
(formerly Mammatech Corporation)
 
       
Date: August 20, 2012
By:
/s/ James Michael Whitfield
 
   
James Michael Whitfield,
 
   
Chief Executive Officer
 
   
(Duly Authorized and Principal Executive Offer)
 
 
Date: August 20, 2012
By:
/s/ James Michael Whitfield
 
   
James Michael Whitfield,
 
   
Chief Financial Officer
 
   
(Duly Authorized and Principal Financial Officer) 
 
 
 
40

XOTC:DEAC Elite Data Services Inc Quarterly Report 10-Q Filling

Elite Data Services Inc XOTC:DEAC Stock - Get Quarterly Report SEC Filing of Elite Data Services Inc XOTC:DEAC stocks, including company profile, shares outstanding, strategy, business segments, operations, officers, consolidated financial statements, financial notes and ownership information.

Content Partners
XOTC:DEAC Elite Data Services Inc Quarterly Report 10-Q Filing - 6/30/2012
Name |  Ticker |  Star Rating |  Market Cap |  Stock Type |  Sector |  Industry Star Rating |  Investment Style |  Total Assets |  Category |  Top Holdings |  Top Sectors |  Symbol |  Title Star Rating |  Category |  Total Assets |  Top Holdings |  Top Sectors |  Symbol |  Name Title |  Date |  Author |  Collection |  Interest |  Popularity Topic |  Sector |  Key Indicators |  User Interest |  Market Cap |  Industry Name |  Ticker |  Star Rating |  Market Cap |  Stock Type |  Sector |  Industry Star Rating |  Investment Style |  Total Assets |  Category |  Top Holdings |  Top Sectors |  Symbol / Ticker |  Title Star Rating |  Category |  Total Assets |  Symbol / Ticker |  Name Title |  Date |  Author |  Collection |  Popularity |  Interest Title |  Date |  Company |  Symbol |  Interest |  Popularity Topic |  Sector |  Key Indicators |  User Interest |  Market Cap |  Industry Name |  Ticker |  Popularity |  Our Choices Title |  Date |  Company |  Symbol |  Interest |  Popularity

Previous: XOTC:DEAC Elite Data Services Inc Quarterly Report 10-Q Filing - 3/31/2012  |  Next: XOTC:DECN Quarterly Report 10-Q Filing - 3/31/2012