|• 10-Q • EX-31.1 • EX-31.2 • EX-32.1 • EX-32.2 • XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT • XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-31313
BROADWIND ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
47 East Chicago Avenue, Suite 332, Naperville, IL 60540
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Number of shares of registrants common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding as of July 31, 2012: 140,956,339.
BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except per share data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve months ending December 31, 2012. The December 31, 2011 consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. This financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein include the accounts of Broadwind Energy, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Additionally, certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.
There have been no material changes in the Companys significant accounting policies during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms we, us, our, Broadwind, and the Company refer to Broadwind Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation headquartered in Naperville, Illinois, and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Broadwind provides technologically advanced high-value products and services to energy, mining and infrastructure sector customers, primarily in the U.S. The Companys most significant presence is within the U.S. wind industry, although it has increasingly diversified into other industrial markets in order to improve its capacity utilization and reduce its exposure to uncertainty related to the extension or renewal of tax incentives and other favorable governmental policies currently supporting the U.S. wind industry. For the first six months of 2012, the Companys revenue was derived 63% from sales associated with new wind turbine installations, down from 75% for the same period of 2011.
The Companys product and service portfolio provides its wind energy customers, including wind turbine manufacturers, wind farm developers and wind farm operators, with access to a broad array of component and service offerings. Outside of the wind market, the Company provides precision gearing and specialty weldments to a broad range of industrial customers for oil and gas, mining and other industrial applications.
The Company has a limited history of operations and has incurred operating losses since inception, partly due to large non-cash charges attributable to significant capital expenditures and acquisition outlays during 2007 and 2008. In the second quarter of 2012, the Company experienced production delays in its Towers and Weldments segment associated with the simultaneous production of multiple tower designs, and consequently the Companys total raw materials increased to $23,055 as of June 30, 2012, a total increase of $11,112 in the six months since the end of 2011, which significantly reduced available liquidity to fund operations. The Company expects the situation to be resolved and inventories reduced to historical levels in the latter half of 2012. This inventory increase has been funded with assignments of customer receivables under the Wells Fargo Account Purchase Agreements, and by extending accounts payable.
In addition, please refer to Note 17, Restructuring of these consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Companys restructuring plan through 2013 which the Company initiated in the third quarter of 2011. To date, the Company has incurred $2,756 of costs in conjunction with its restructuring plan. Including costs incurred to date, the Company expects that a total of approximately $11,600 of costs will be incurred to implement this restructuring plan. Of the total projected expenses, the Company anticipates that $3,400 will be non-cash expenditures. The Company anticipates that the remaining cash expenditures will be funded substantially by net proceeds from asset sales of $7,200. The Company anticipates cash flow savings of $5,500 annually from the restructuring efforts.
The Company anticipates that current cash resources and cash to be generated from operations or other financing arrangements over the next twelve months will be adequate to meet the Companys liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. As discussed further in Note 8, Debt and Credit Agreements of these consolidated financial statements, the Company is obligated to make principal payments on outstanding debt totaling $1,455 during the next twelve months, has $4,333 of indebtedness associated with its Liabilities Held for Sale and is obligated to make purchases totaling $360 during the same period under the purchase commitments described in Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies of these consolidated financial statements. If assumptions regarding the Companys restructuring efforts, production, sales and subsequent collections from several of the Companys large customers, as well as revenues generated from new customer orders, are not materially consistent with managements expectations, the Company may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to the Company, which could affect its overall operations. Any additional equity financing, if available, may be dilutive to stockholders, and additional debt financing, if available, will likely require financial covenants or impose other restrictions on the Company. While the Company believes that it will continue to have sufficient cash flows to operate its businesses and meet its financial obligations, there can be no assurances that its operations will generate sufficient cash or that credit facilities will be available in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to pay its indebtedness or to fund its other liquidity needs.
NOTE 2 EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, as follows:
(1) Stock options and unvested restricted stock units granted and outstanding of 9,565,287 and 2,380,438 as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to the anti-dilutive effect as a result of the Companys net loss for these respective periods.
NOTE 3 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In March 2011, the Company completed the divestiture of its logistics business, through the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary Badger Transport, Inc. (Badger) to BTI Logistics, LLC (BTI Logistics). Proceeds from the sale included approximately $800 in cash, a $1,500 secured promissory note payable in quarterly installments of $125 beginning September 30, 2011, and 100,000 shares of Broadwind common stock held by the buyer. The purchase price was subject to final working capital adjustments and certain contingencies and indemnifications. In addition, BTI Logistics assumed approximately $2,600 of debt and capital leases, plus approximately $1,600 of operating lease obligations.
Results for Badger, which are reflected as discontinued operations in the Companys consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, were as follows:
NOTE 4 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and readily marketable investments with original maturities of three months or less, such as money market funds, short-term government bonds, Treasury bills, marketable securities and commercial paper. The Companys treasury policy is to invest excess cash in money market funds or other short-term investments, which are generally of a short-term duration based upon operating requirements. Income earned on these investments is recorded to interest income in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents totaled $8,136 and $13,340, respectively. These amounts consisted of cash balances and investments in municipal bonds with original maturities of three months or less.
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
NOTE 5 INVENTORIES
The components of inventories as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
The significant increase in inventories from year-end is related to the significant build-up of raw materials within the Companys Towers and Weldments business due to increased steel purchases in support of production for multiple tower designs, as well as production delays encountered in the second quarter. The Company expects inventory levels to revert back to historical levels in the latter half of 2012.
NOTE 6 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets represent the fair value assigned to definite-lived assets such as trade names and customer relationships as part of the Companys acquisition of its Gearing subsidiary completed during 2007. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from 8 to 20 years. The Company tests intangible assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company identified triggering events associated with the Companys current period operating loss combined with its history of
continued operating losses. As a result, the Company evaluated the recoverability of certain of its identifiable intangible assets. Based upon the Companys assessment, the recoverable amount and the fair value were substantially in excess of the carrying amount of the intangible assets, and no impairment to these assets was indicated as of June 30, 2012. Despite having recoverable amounts substantially in excess of the total $8,784 carrying value of the intangible assets, the Company has concluded that it is appropriate to shorten the useful life associated with a $2,216 portion of the customer relationships intangible assets and amortize it over one year, instead of remaining five years previously assigned to this portion of the intangible assets.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the cost basis, accumulated amortization, impairment charge and net book value of intangible assets were as follows:
NOTE 7 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:
NOTE 8 DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS
The Companys outstanding debt balances as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:
Investors Community Bank Loans
On April 7, 2008, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary R.B.A. Inc. (RBA) executed four promissory notes with Investors Community Bank (ICB) in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $3,781. Three of these notes were term notes, with initial principal balances totaling $2,049, bearing interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.65% to 6.85% per annum, with maturities ranging from October 2012 to April 2013 (collectively, the ICB Notes). The fourth note was a line of credit note, which has been repaid in full.
Pursuant to the merger of RBA into the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary Broadwind Towers, Inc. (f/k/a Tower Tech Systems Inc.) (Broadwind Towers) on December 31, 2009, the loans evidenced by the ICB Notes (collectively, the ICB Loans)
were modified pursuant to a Master Amendment among ICB, Broadwind Towers and the Company (as guarantor) (the Master Amendment). Under the terms of the Master Amendment, Broadwind Towers agreed to a number of security and financial covenants. As the outstanding balances under the ICB Loans have declined, certain of these requirements have been removed through subsequent amendments to the Master Amendment. The remaining security requirements are that Broadwind Towers maintain a depository relationship of not less than $700 with ICB and maintain a debt service ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 at all times. The ICB Loans are also secured by a mortgage on a facility owned by Broadwind Towers in Clintonville, Wisconsin, and by a guarantee from the Company. As of June 30, 2012, (i) the total amount of outstanding indebtedness under the ICB Notes was $960, (ii) the effective per annum interest rate under the ICB Notes was 5.69%, and (iii) Broadwind Towers was in compliance with all covenants under the documents evidencing and securing the ICB Loans.
Great Western Bank Loan
On April 28, 2009, Broadwind Towers entered into a Construction Loan Agreement with Great Western Bank (GWB), pursuant to which GWB agreed to provide up to $10,000 in financing (the Construction Loan) to fund construction of Broadwind Towers wind tower manufacturing facility in Brandon, South Dakota (the Brandon Facility). Pursuant to a Change in Terms Agreement dated April 5, 2010 between GWB and Broadwind Towers, the Construction Loan was converted to a term loan (the GWB Term Loan) providing for monthly payments of principal plus interest, extending the maturity date to November 5, 2016, reducing the principal amount to $6,500, and changing the per annum interest rate to 8.5%.
The GWB Term Loan is secured by a first mortgage on the Brandon Facility and all fixtures and proceeds relating thereto, pursuant to a Mortgage and a Commercial Security Agreement, each between Broadwind Towers and GWB, and by a Commercial Guaranty from the Company. In addition, the Company has agreed to subordinate all intercompany debt with Broadwind Towers to the GWB Term Loan. The GWB Term Loan contains representations, warranties and covenants that are customary for a term financing arrangement and contains no financial covenants. As of June 30, 2012, the total outstanding indebtedness under the GWB Term Loan was $4,333, which is recorded as Liabilities Held for Sale within the consolidated balance sheet in light of the Company having initiated a process to sell the Brandon Facility.
Wells Fargo Account Purchase Agreements
On September 29, 2010, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries Broadwind Towers, Brad Foote Gear Works, Inc. (Brad Foote), Broadwind Services, LLC f/k/a Energy Maintenance Service, LLC (Broadwind Services) (collectively, the Subsidiaries), and Badger entered into account purchase agreements (the AP Agreements) with Wells Fargo Business Credit, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo). Under the AP Agreements, when requested by the Company, Wells Fargo will advance funds against certain receivables arising from sales of the Subsidiaries products and services. In connection with the entry into the AP Agreements, the Company, Badger and each Subsidiary executed guaranties (including cross-guaranties) in favor of Wells Fargo. With respect to the Subsidiaries, the AP Agreements contain provisions providing for cross-defaults and cross-collateralization. In addition, each Subsidiary has granted to Wells Fargo a security interest against all financed receivables and related collateral. Prior to entering into the AP Agreements, there was no material relationship between the Company, the Subsidiaries and Wells Fargo.
Under the terms of the AP Agreements, when requested by the Company, Wells Fargo will advance approximately 80% of the face value of eligible receivables to the Subsidiaries. Wells Fargo will have full recourse to the Subsidiaries for collection of the financed receivables. The aggregate facility limit of the AP Agreements is $10,000. For Wells Fargos services under the AP Agreements, the Subsidiaries have agreed to pay Wells Fargo (i) a floating discount fee of the then-prevailing London Interbank Offered Rate plus 3.75% per annum on the sum of the outstanding financed accounts, (ii) an annual facility fee of 1% of the aggregate facility limit, and (iii) an annual unused line fee of 0.042% on the portion of the credit facility which is unused. The initial term of the AP Agreements ends on September 29, 2013. If the AP Agreements are terminated prior to this date, an early termination fee of up to 2% of the aggregate facility limit may apply. On October 19, 2011 the AP Agreements were amended to modify the month-end minimum total cash balance requirement from $5,000 to the greater of $2,000 or the outstanding purchased amount, not to exceed $5,000.
In connection with the sale of Badger to a third party purchaser in March 2011, the AP Agreement between Badger and Wells Fargo and the guaranty provided by Badger to Wells Fargo with respect to the other AP Agreements were each terminated, pursuant to an Omnibus Amendment to Account Purchase Agreements and Guaranties dated as of March 4, 2011, by and among the Company, the Subsidiaries and Wells Fargo.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company financed approximately $22,706 of accounts receivable with Wells Fargo. At June 30, 2012, $7,284 of financed receivables remained outstanding, and the Subsidiaries had the ability to draw up to an additional $2,716. All outstanding financed receivables are recorded net of Accounts Receivable within the consolidated balance sheet.
Selling Shareholder Notes
On May 26, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the three former owners of Brad Foote, including J. Cameron Drecoll, who served as the Companys Chief Executive Officer and a member of its Board of Directors until December 1, 2010. The Settlement Agreement related to the post-closing escrow established in connection with the Companys acquisition of Brad Foote. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, among other terms, the Company issued three promissory notes to the former owners in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000, bearing interest at a rate of 7% per annum and maturing on May 29, 2012. The notes issued to the former owners other than Mr. Drecoll, each with an original principal amount of $340, were repaid upon maturity in May 2012.
Mr. Drecolls note, with an original principal amount of $2,320, was amended on July 1, 2011, to (i) change the maturity date to January 10, 2014; (ii) increase the interest rate to 9% per annum; and (iii) amend the repayment schedule to amortize, beginning with payments commencing in the fourth quarter of 2011. Under the terms of the amendment, the Company has reduced the principal amount outstanding under the note to $1,677, and had $38 of accrued interest as of June 30, 2012. On July 17, 2012, the note was further amended to provide for payment of the remaining balance in two equal installments of $751 each on October 10, 2012 and January 10, 2013, or sooner if the Companys cash balance and credit availability meet certain thresholds. As a result of the July 2012 note amendment, $506 of the remaining long term debt associated with this note at June 30, 2012 became current.
Included in Long Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities is $2,280 associated with the New Markets Tax Credit Transaction described further in Note 16, New Markets Tax Credit Transaction of these consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 9 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the Company is required to provide disclosure and categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. Financial instruments are assessed quarterly to determine the appropriate classification within the fair value hierarchy. Transfers between fair value classifications are made based upon the nature and type of the observable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is defined as follows:
Level 1 Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Valuations are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and customer deposits approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. Based upon interest rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms, the carrying value of the Companys long-term debt is approximately equal to its fair value.
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
The fair value measurement approach for long-lived assets utilizes a number of significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions. These assumptions include, among others, projections of the Companys future operating results, the implied fair value of these assets using an income approach by preparing a discounted cash flow analysis and a market-based approach based on the Companys market capitalization, and other subjective assumptions. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company identified triggering events associated with the Companys current period operating loss combined with its history of continued operating losses.
As a result, the Company evaluated the recoverability of certain of its identifiable intangible assets and certain property and equipment assets. Based upon the Companys assessment, no additional impairment to these assets was identified as of June 30, 2012.
NOTE 10 INCOME TAXES
Effective tax rates differ from federal statutory income tax rates primarily due to changes in the Companys valuation allowance, permanent differences and provisions for state and local income taxes. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had no net deferred income taxes due to the full recorded valuation allowance. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $10 from continuing operations compared to a provision for income taxes of $16 from continuing operations during the three months ended June 30, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $30 from continuing operations compared to a provision for income taxes of $33 from continuing operations during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The Company files income tax returns in U.S. federal and state jurisdictions. As of June 2012, open tax years in federal and some state jurisdictions date back to 1996 due to the taxing authorities ability to adjust operating loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $136,189 expiring in various years through 2031.
The Company does not anticipate there will be a material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. However, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the IRC), generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards and associated built-in losses that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone certain changes in stock ownership. The Companys ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses may be limited, under this section or otherwise, by the Companys issuance of common stock or by other changes in stock ownership. Upon completion of the Companys analysis of IRC Section 382, the Company has determined that aggregate changes in stock ownership have triggered an annual limitation of net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses available for utilization. To the extent the Companys use of net operating loss carryforwards and associated built-in losses is significantly limited in the future due to additional changes in stock ownership, the Companys income could be subject to U.S. corporate income tax earlier than it would if the Company were able to use net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses without such limitation, which could result in lower profits and the loss of benefits from these attributes.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company has $435 of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would have a favorable impact on income tax expense. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. The Company has accrued interest and penalties of $149 as of June 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $417, of which $131 represented accrued interest and penalties.
NOTE 11 SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Overview of Share-Based Compensation Plans
2007 Equity Incentive Plan
The Company grants incentive stock options and other equity awards pursuant to the Amended and Restated Broadwind Energy, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2007 EIP), which was approved by the Companys Board of Directors in October 2007 and by the Companys stockholders in June 2008. The 2007 EIP has been amended periodically since its original approval. Specifically, (i) the 2007 EIP was amended by the Companys stockholders in June 2009 to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2007 EIP, (ii) the 2007 EIP was further amended and restated in March 2011 by the Companys Board of Directors to limit share recycling under the 2007 EIP, to include a minimum vesting period for time-vesting restricted stock awards and restricted stock units (RSUs) and to add a clawback provision, and (iii) the 2007 EIP was further amended at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 4, 2012 to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2007 EIP to provide sufficient authorized shares to settle certain awards granted in December 2011.
The 2007 EIP reserved 6,910,510 shares of the Companys common stock for grants to officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors upon whose efforts the success of the Company and its affiliates will depend to a large degree. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had reserved 1,234,136 shares for issuance upon the exercise of stock options outstanding and 4,516,446 shares for issuance upon the vesting of RSU awards outstanding. As of June 30, 2012, 704,722 shares of common stock reserved for stock options and RSU awards under the 2007 EIP have been issued in the form of common stock.
2012 Equity Incentive Plan
On March 8, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors approved the Broadwind Energy, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2012 EIP; together with the 2007 EIP, the Equity Incentive Plans), and at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 4, 2012, the Companys stockholders approved the adoption of the 2012 EIP. The purposes of the 2012 EIP are (i) to align the interests of the Companys stockholders and recipients of awards under the 2012 EIP by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Companys growth and success; (ii) to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining officers, other employees, non-employee directors, and independent contractors; and (iii) to motivate such persons to act in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Under the 2012 EIP, the Company may grant (i) non-qualified stock options; (ii) incentive stock options (within the meaning of IRC Section 422); (iii) stock appreciation rights; (iv) restricted stock and RSUs; and (v) performance awards.
The 2012 EIP reserves 12,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock for grants to officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors upon whose efforts the success of the Company and its affiliates will depend to a large degree. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had reserved 1,650,000 shares for issuance upon the exercise of stock options outstanding, 2,164,705 shares for issuance upon the vesting of RSU awards outstanding, and 8,185,295 additional shares for future awards under the 2012 EIP. As of June 30, 2012, no shares of common stock reserved for stock options and RSU awards under the 2012 EIP have been issued in the form of common stock.
Stock Options. The exercise price of stock options granted under the Equity Incentive Plans is equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. Stock options generally become exercisable on the anniversary of the grant date, with vesting terms that may range from one to five years from the date of grant. Additionally, stock options expire ten years after the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is expensed ratably over their vesting term.
Restricted Stock Units. The granting of RSUs is provided for under the Equity Incentive Plans. RSUs generally vest on the anniversary of the grant date, with vesting terms that may range from one to five years from the date of grant. The fair value of each RSU granted is equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant and is generally expensed ratably over the vesting term of the RSU award.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2012 under the Equity Incentive Plans, as follows:
The following table summarizes RSU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2012 under the Equity Incentive Plans, as follows:
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determination of the fair value of each stock option is affected by the Companys stock price on the date of grant, as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the expected life of the awards and actual and projected stock option exercise behavior. The weighted average fair value per share of stock option awards granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the assumptions used to value these stock options, are as follows:
Dividend yield is zero as the Company currently does not pay a dividend.
Risk-free rate is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the award.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, the Company utilized a standard volatility assumption of 99.98% and 96.09%, respectively, for estimating the fair value of stock options awarded based on comparable volatility averages for the energy related sector.
The expected life of each stock option award granted is derived using the simplified method for estimating the expected term of a vanilla-option in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, Share-Based Payment, as amended by SAB No. 110, Share-Based Payment. The fair value of each unit of restricted stock is equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock as of the date of grant.
The Company utilized a forfeiture rate of 25% during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for estimating the forfeitures of stock options granted.
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense included in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, as follows:
(1) Income tax benefit is not illustrated because the Company is currently operating at a loss and an actual income tax benefit was not realized for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The result of the loss situation creates a timing difference, resulting in a deferred tax asset, which is fully reserved for in the Companys valuation allowance.
(2) Diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 does not include common stock equivalents due to their anti-dilutive nature as a result of the Companys net losses for these respective periods. Accordingly, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share are identical for all periods presented.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company estimates that pre-tax compensation expense for all unvested share-based awards, including both stock options and RSUs, in the amount of approximately $3,794 will be recognized through 2016. The Company expects to satisfy the exercise of stock options and future distribution of shares of restricted stock by issuing new shares of common stock.
NOTE 12 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On February 11, 2011, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against the Company and certain of its current or former officers and directors. The lawsuit is purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of the Companys common stock between March 17, 2009 and August 9, 2010. A lead plaintiff has been appointed and an amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2011. The amended complaint names as additional defendants certain of the Companys current and former directors, certain Tontine entities, and Jeffrey Gendell, a principal of Tontine. The complaint seeks to allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and/or Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by issuing or causing to be issued a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements concerning the Companys financial results, operations, and prospects, including with respect to the January 2010 secondary public offering of the Companys common stock. The plaintiffs allege that the Companys statements were false and misleading because, among other things, the Companys reported financial results during the class period allegedly violated generally accepted accounting principles because they failed to reflect the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, and the Company allegedly failed to disclose known trends and other information regarding certain customer relationships at Brad Foote. In support of their claims, the plaintiffs rely in part upon six alleged confidential informants, all of whom are alleged to be former employees of the Company. On November 18, 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss. On April 19, 2012, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion. The Court dismissed all claims with prejudice against each of the named current and former officers except for J. Cameron Drecoll and held that the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim for any alleged misstatements made after March 19, 2010. In addition, the Court dismissed all claims with prejudice against the named Tontine entities and Mr. Gendell. The Court denied the motion with respect to certain of the claims asserted against the Company and Mr. Drecoll. The Company filed its answer and affirmative defenses on May 21, 2012 and intends to vigorously defend the remaining claims asserted against it. Between February 15, 2011 and March 30, 2011, three putative shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division against certain of the Companys current and former officers and directors, and certain Tontine entities, seeking to challenge alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment, including in connection with the January 2010 secondary public offering of the Companys common stock. One of the lawsuits also alleges that certain directors violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act in connection with the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Two of the matters pending in the federal court were subsequently consolidated, and on May 15, 2012, the Court granted defendants motion to dismiss the consolidated cases and also entered an order dismissing the third case. The Company has received a request from the Tontine defendants for indemnification in the derivative suits and the class action lawsuit and may receive additional requests for indemnification from Tontine and/or Mr. Gendell pursuant to various agreements related to shares owned by Tontine. The Company maintains directors and officers liability insurance; however, the costs of indemnification for Mr. Gendell and/or Tontine would not be covered by any Company insurance policy. Because of the preliminary nature of these lawsuits, the Company is not able to estimate a loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter at this time.
In August 2011, the Company received a subpoena from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeking documents and other records related to certain accounting practices at Brad Foote. The subpoena was issued in connection with an informal inquiry that the Company received from the SEC in November 2010 arising out of a whistleblower complaint received by the SEC related to revenue recognition, cost accounting and intangible and fixed asset valuations at Brad Foote. The Company has been providing information to the SEC in response to the informal inquiry and subpoena. The Company cannot currently predict the outcome of this investigation. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company has received a request from Tontine for indemnification of expenses incurred in connection with an SEC subpoena and may receive additional requests for indemnification from Tontine and/or Mr. Gendell pursuant to various agreements related to shares owned by Tontine. No estimate regarding the loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter is possible at this time.
The Company is aware of a grand jury investigation commenced by the United States Attorneys Office, Northern District of Illinois, for potential violation of federal environmental laws. On February 15, 2011, pursuant to a search warrant, officials from the United States Environmental Protection Agency entered and conducted a search of one of Brad Footes facilities in Cicero, Illinois, in connection with the alleged improper disposal of industrial wastewater to the sewer. Also on or about February 15, 2011, in connection with the same matter, the Company received two grand jury subpoenas requesting testimony and the production of certain documents relating to the Brad Foote facilitys past compliance with certain environmental laws and regulations relating to the generation, discharge and disposal of wastewater from certain of its processes between 2004 and the present. On or about February 23,
2011, the Company received another grand jury subpoena relating to the same investigation, requesting testimony and the production of certain other documents relating to certain of the Brad Foote facilitys employees, environmental and manufacturing processes, and disposal practices. The Company has produced e-mails, reports and correspondence as requested, and completed its response to these subpoenas on August 17, 2011. The Company does not currently have information as to when the investigation may be concluded, and is also conducting an internal investigation of any possible non-compliance. The Company has also voluntarily instituted corrective measures at the Brad Foote facility, including changes to its wastewater disposal practices. At this time, the Company has been advised that Brad Foote is a target of the investigation, but no fines or penalties have been suggested. There can be no assurances that the conclusion of the investigation will not result in a determination that applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations were violated at the Brad Foote facility. Any violations found, or any criminal or civil fines, penalties and/or other sanctions imposed could be substantial and materially and adversely affect the Company. The Company had recorded a liability of $675 at December 31, 2010, which represented the low end of its estimate of remediation-related costs and expenses; as of June 30, 2012, those initial costs have been incurred, and additional costs have been expensed as incurred. No additional remediation related expenses are anticipated or have been accrued; however, the outcome of the investigation, the liability in connection therewith, and the impact to the Companys operations cannot be predicted at this time. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. No estimate regarding the loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter is possible at this time.
The Company is also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial position or liquidity. It is possible that if one or more of the matters described above were decided against the Company, the effects could be material to the Companys results of operations in the period in which the Company would be required to record or adjust the related liability and could also be material to the Companys cash flows in the periods the Company would be required to pay such liability.
NOTE 13 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Company reviews new accounting standards as issued. Although some of these accounting standards issued or effective after the end of the Companys previous fiscal year may be applicable to the Company, the Company has not identified any new standards that it believes merit further discussion. The Company believes that none of the new standards will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 14 SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company is organized into reporting segments based on the nature of the products and services offered and business activities from which it earns revenues and incurs expenses for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the Companys chief operating decision maker. The Companys segments and their product and service offerings are summarized below:
Towers and Weldments
The Company manufactures towers for wind turbines, specifically the large and heavier wind towers that are designed for 2 megawatt (MW) and larger wind turbines. Production facilities, located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Abilene, Texas, are situated in close proximity to the primary U.S. domestic energy and equipment manufacturing hubs. The two facilities have a combined annual tower production capacity of approximately 500 towers, sufficient to support turbines generating more than 1,200 MW of power. This product segment also encompasses the manufacture of specialty fabrications and specialty weldments for mining and other industrial customers. Consistent with the Companys diversification strategy, during 2012 a portion of the Companys tower capacity has been shifted to support the growing demand for specialty weldments.
The Company engineers, builds and remanufactures precision gears and gearing systems for oil and gas, wind, mining and other industrial applications. The Company uses an integrated manufacturing process, which includes machining and finishing processes in Cicero, Illinois, and heat treatment in Neville Island, Pennsylvania.
The Company offers a comprehensive range of services, primarily to wind farm developers and operators. The Company specializes in non-routine maintenance services for both kilowatt and megawatt turbines. The Company also offers comprehensive field services to the wind industry. The Company is increasingly focusing its efforts on the identification and/or development of product and service offerings which will improve the reliability and efficiency of wind turbines, and therefore enhance the economic benefits to its customers. The Company provides wind services across the U.S., with primary service locations in South Dakota and Texas. In February 2011, the Company put into operation its dedicated drivetrain service center in Abilene, Texas, which is focused on servicing the growing installed base of MW wind turbines as they come off warranty and, to a limited extent, industrial gearboxes requiring precision repair and testing.
Corporate and Eliminations
Corporate includes the assets and selling, general and administrative expenses of the Companys corporate office. Eliminations is comprised of adjustments to reconcile segment results to consolidated results.
Summary financial information by reportable segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:
(1) Intersegment revenues generally include a 10% markup over costs and primarily consist of sales from Gearing to Services. Gearing sales to Services totaled $617 and $25 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
NOTE 15 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company completed construction of the Brandon Facility in the first quarter of 2010, but has not commenced production at this Facility. During 2010 the Company concluded that it would be difficult or impossible to operate the Brandon Facility in a profitable or cost-effective manner in light of the expected mid-term demand for wind towers. In connection with this determination, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $13,326 to reduce the carrying value of the Brandon Facility assets to fair value. The Company currently has purchase commitments totaling approximately $360 outstanding related to the Brandon Facility. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company initiated a process to sell the Brandon Facility and reclassified the Brandon Facility, and the related indebtedness, to Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities Held for Sale, respectively (see Note 17, Restructuring of these financial statements).
Environmental Compliance and Remediation Liabilities
The Companys operations and products are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates and sells products governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the use, handling and disposal of hazardous materials, soil and groundwater contamination, employee health and safety, and product content, performance and packaging. Certain environmental laws can impose the entire cost or a portion of the cost of investigating and cleaning up a contaminated site, regardless of fault, upon any one or more of a number of parties, including the current or previous owners or operators of the site. These environmental laws can also impose liability on any person who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at a contaminated site. Third parties may also make claims against owners, operators and/or users of disposal sites for personal injuries and property damage associated with releases of hazardous substances from those sites.
The Company provides warranty terms that range from one to seven years for various products and services supplied by the Company. In certain contracts, the Company has recourse provisions for items that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid to customers under warranty provisions. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, estimated product warranty liability was $762 and $897, respectively, and is recorded within accrued liabilities in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The changes in the carrying amount of the Companys total product warranty liability for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Based upon past experience and judgment, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts with respect to accounts receivable. The Companys standard allowance estimation methodology considers a number of factors that, based on its collections experience, the Company believes will have an impact on its credit risk and the realizability of its accounts receivable. These factors include individual customer circumstances, history with the Company and other relevant criteria.
The Company monitors its collections and write-off experience to assess whether or not adjustments to its allowance estimates are necessary. Changes in trends in any of the factors that the Company believes may impact the realizability of its accounts receivable, as noted above, or modifications to its credit standards, collection practices and other related policies may impact the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts and its financial results. The activity in the accounts receivable allowance liability for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following:
In select instances, the Company has pledged specific inventory and machinery and equipment assets to serve as collateral on related payable or financing obligations.
In certain customer contracts, the Company has agreed to pay liquidated damages in the event of qualifying delivery or production delays. These damages are typically limited to a specific percentage of the value of the product in question.
As of June 30, 2012, approximately 21% of the Companys employees were covered by two collective bargaining agreements with United Steelworkers local unions in Cicero, Illinois and Neville Island, Pennsylvania, which are scheduled to remain in effect through February 2014 and October 2012, respectively. The Company considers its union and employee relations to be satisfactory.
The sale price from the sale of the Companys Badger subsidiary to BTI Logistics is subject to final working capital adjustments, certain contingencies and indemnifications.
On July 20, 2011, the Company executed a strategic financing transaction (the NMTC Transaction) involving the following third parties: AMCREF Fund VII, LLC (AMCREF), a registered community development entity; COCRF Investor VIII, LLC (COCRF); and Capital One, National Association (Capital One). The NMTC Transaction allows the Company to receive below market interest rate funds through the federal New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) program, see Note 16, New Markets Tax Credit Transaction of these consolidated financial statements. Pursuant to the NMTC Transaction, the gross loan and investment in the Companys Abilene, Texas gearbox refurbishment facility (the Gearbox Facility) of $10,000 will generate $3,900 in tax credits over a period of seven years, which the NMTC Transaction makes available to Capital One. The Gearbox Facility must operate and be in compliance with the terms and conditions of the NMTC Transaction during the seven year compliance period, or the Company may be liable for the recapture of $3,900 in tax credits to which Capital One is otherwise entitled. The Company does not anticipate any credit recaptures will be required in connection with the NMTC Transaction.
NOTE 16 NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT TRANSACTION
On July 20, 2011, the Company received $2,280 in proceeds via the NMTC Transaction. The NMTC Transaction qualifies under the NMTC program and included a gross loan from AMCREF to Broadwind Services in the principal amount of $10,000, with a
term of fifteen years and interest payable at the rate of 1.4% per annum, largely offset by a gross loan in the principal amount of $7,720 from the Company to COCRF, with a term of fifteen years and interest payable at the rate of 2.5% per annum.
The NMTC regulations permit taxpayers to claim credits against their federal income taxes for up to 39% of qualified investments in the equity of community development entities. The NMTC Transaction could generate $3,900 in tax credits, which the Company has made available under the structure by passing them through to Capital One. The proceeds have been applied to the Companys recent investment in the Gearbox Facility assets and operating costs, as permitted under the NMTC program.
The Gearbox Facility must operate and be in compliance with various regulations and restrictions for seven years to comply with the terms of the NMTC Transaction, or the Company may be liable under its indemnification agreement with Capital One for the recapture of tax credits. The NMTC program tax credits are subject to 100% recapture for a period of seven years as provided in the IRC. The Company does not anticipate that any tax credit recapture events will occur or that it will be required to make any payments to Capital One under the indemnification agreement.
The Capital One contribution has been included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2012. The NMTC Transaction includes a put/call provision whereby the Company may be obligated or entitled to repurchase Capital Ones interest. Capital One may exercise an option to put its investment and receive $130 from the Company. If Capital One does not exercise its put option, the Company can exercise a call option at the then fair market value of the call. The Company believes that Capital One will exercise the put option in 2018 at the end of the tax credit recapture period. The Capital One contribution other than the amount allocated to the put obligation will be recognized as income only after the put/call is exercised and when Capital One has no ongoing interest. However, there is no legal obligation for Capital One to exercise the put, and the Company has attributed only an insignificant value to the put option included in this transaction structure.
The Company has determined that two pass-through financing entities created under this transaction structure are variable interest entities (VIEs). The ongoing activities of the VIEscollecting and remitting interest and fees and complying with NMTC program requirementswere considered in the initial design of the NMTC Transaction and are not expected to significantly affect economic performance throughout the life of the VIEs. Management also considered the contractual arrangements that obligate the Company to deliver tax benefits and provide various other guarantees under the transaction structure, Capital Ones lack of a material interest in the underlying economics of the project, and the fact that the Company is obligated to absorb losses of the VIEs. The Company has concluded that it is required to consolidate the VIEs because the Company has both (i) the power to direct those matters that most significantly impact the activities of each VIE and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of each VIE.
The $262 of issue costs paid to third parties in connection with the NMTC Transaction are recorded as prepaid expenses, and are being amortized over the expected seven year term of the NMTC arrangement. Capital Ones net contribution of $2,280 is included in Long Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities in the consolidated balance sheet. Incremental costs to maintain the transaction structure during the compliance period will be recognized as they are incurred.
NOTE 17 RESTRUCTURING
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company conducted a review of its business strategies and product plans based on the outlook for the economy at large, the forecast for the industries it serves, and its business environment. The Company concluded that its manufacturing footprint and fixed cost base are too large and expensive for its medium-term needs and has begun restructuring its facility capacity and its management structure to consolidate and increase the efficiencies of its operations.
The Company is executing a plan to reduce its facility footprint by approximately 40% through the sale and/or closure during the next twelve months of facilities comprising a total of approximately 600,000 square feet. The Company believes the remaining locations will be sufficient to support its Towers and Weldments, Gearing, Services and general corporate and administrative activities, while allowing for growth for the next several years.
As part of this plan, in the third quarter of 2011, the Company determined that the Brandon Facility should be sold, and as a result the Company has reclassified the land, building and fixtures valued at $8,000 from Property and Equipment to Assets Held for Sale. In addition, the related indebtedness associated with the Brandon Facility of $4,583 was reclassified in the third quarter of 2011 from Long-Term Debt Net of Current Maturities and Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt to Liabilities Held for Sale. The Company expects that this sale will be completed in the next twelve months. The Company had previously recorded an impairment charge of $13,326 in the fourth quarter of 2010 to bring these assets to fair value; no further impairment charges were recorded.
Additional restructuring plans were approved in the fourth quarter of 2011. To date, the Company has incurred $2,756 of costs in conjunction with its restructuring plan. Including costs incurred to date, the Company expects that a total of approximately $11,600 of costs will be incurred to implement this restructuring plan. Of the total projected expenses, the Company anticipates that a
total of approximately $3,400 will consist of non-cash expenditures. The Company expects the remaining cash expenditures will be funded substantially by net proceeds from asset sales of $7,200. The table below details the Companys total restructuring charges incurred to date and the total expected restructuring charges as of June 30, 2012:
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in Item 1, Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The discussion below contains forward-looking statements that are based upon our current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances including, but not limited to, those identified in Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements at the end of Item 2. Actual results may differ materially from these expectations due to inaccurate assumptions and known or unknown risks and uncertainties.
(Dollars are presented in thousands except per share data or unless otherwise stated)
Second Quarter Overview
During the second quarter of 2012, we continued to execute our strategy in an improving, but still challenging, economic climate. We anticipate that economic conditions within the wind industry will stay strong for the third quarter, but will weaken significantly in the latter part of 2012 and into 2013 due to the scheduled expiration of the Production Tax Credit that supports the wind industry. Since October 2010, we have been focused on diversifying our revenue stream, and for the first six months of 2012, only 63% of our sales were associated with products produced to support new U.S. wind energy installations. Despite the success of our diversification efforts, the towers business in particular is largely linked to new wind installations and is expected to be impacted by the potential delay or expiration of the Production Tax Credit. We are focused on further diversifying this business, both through expansion of the weldments activity and through entry into North American export markets. However, to the extent that we are unable to secure sufficient wind tower orders, we may need to scale back our operations in this segment. We cannot provide assurances that improved market conditions within the wind industry will occur or that we will be able to capitalize on these opportunities. In addition, a continued or prolonged economic slowdown in the wind industry or other unfavorable market factors, including pressures in the natural gas production markets caused by current oversupply and historically low prices, could result in further revisions to our expectations with respect to future financial results and cash flows. In response to these conditions, we have made a strategic decision
to diversify our business into oil, gas, mining, and other industries, particularly within gearing and industrial weldments. These factors have required management to reassess its estimates of the fair value of some of our reportable segments and could result in further review of our intangible assets and fixed assets, although no additional impairment to the carrying value of these assets was indicated by our second quarter 2012 testing.
During the third quarter of 2011 we conducted a review of our business strategies and product plans given the outlook for the economy at large, the forecast for the industries we serve, and our own business environment. As a result, we have begun to execute a restructuring plan to rationalize our facility capacity and our management structure, and to consolidate and increase the efficiencies of our operations. We have concluded that our wind manufacturing footprint and fixed cost base is too large and expensive for our medium-term needs. We are executing a plan to reduce our facility footprint by nearly 40% through the sale and/or closure of facilities comprising a total of approximately 600,000 square feet during the next twelve months. We believe the remaining locations will be sufficient to support our Towers and Weldments, Gearing, Services and general corporate and administrative activities while allowing for growth for the next several years.
To date, we have incurred $2,756 of costs in conjunction with our restructuring plan. Including costs incurred to date, we expect to incur restructuring costs associated with the consolidation totaling an estimated $11,600. Costs are expected to include approximately $4,200 in capital expenditures and $7,400 in expenses, of which approximately $3,400 is anticipated to be non-cash expenses and $4,000 is anticipated to be cash expenses. Net proceeds from associated asset sales, estimated to be approximately $7,200, will be used to fund cash costs. We anticipate annual cost savings of approximately $5,500 related to the restructuring.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012, Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
The summary of selected financial data table below should be referenced in connection with a review of the following discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Revenues increased by $16,979, from $39,332 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $56,311 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. We experienced increased revenue in each of our business segments. In our Gearing segment, we continue to experience sales increases to our industrial customers as our expanded sales force gains traction. Towers and Weldments revenues increased 51%, despite a 4% decrease in the volume of wind tower sections sold in the second quarter of 2012 compared to
2011. In the current year significant steel costs were included in all of our towers sales, while in the prior year period, fabrication-only tower sections represented 50% of our volume. Our Services segment revenues increased 141% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to 2011.
Gross profit decreased by $1,273, from $2,932 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $1,659 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in gross profit was primarily attributable to a decline in Towers and Weldments gross profit due to the lack of higher margin fabrication-only towers in the current quarter and restructuring costs at Gearing, partially offset by improved volume and margins in both Services and Gearing, as compared to the same period in the prior year. As a result, our gross margin decreased from 7.5% during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to 3.0% during the three months ended June 30, 2012. Gross profit excluding restructuring charges declined by $857, and the resulting gross margin percentage would have been 3.7% in the absence of those restructuring charges.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1,450, from $7,028 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $5,578 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was attributable to lower selling expenses, bad debt expense, professional fees and employee compensation as part of general cost containment efforts. Operating expenses as a percentage of sales decreased dramatically, from 18% in the prior year quarter to 10% in the current year.
Intangible amortization expense of $215 was unchanged compared with the prior year period. Restructuring expense of $25 was incurred in the current quarter, compared to zero in the prior year period. The provision for income taxes was not significant in either period.
Net loss decreased from $4,458 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $4,231 during the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily as a result of the factors described above.
Towers and Weldments Segment
The following table summarizes the Towers and Weldments segment operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Towers and Weldments segment revenues increased by $12,500, from $24,495 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $36,995 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The 51% increase in revenues is due to a heavy mix of fabrication-only tower sections in the prior year quarter and growth in weldment sales. Revenues increased despite a 4% decrease in the volume of wind tower sections sold in the second quarter of 2012 compared to 2011. In the current year significant steel costs were included in all of our towers sales, while in the prior year period, fabrication-only tower sections represented 50% of our volume. We estimate that the impact of the reduced share of fabrication-only tower sections accounted for approximately $10,500 of the increase in Towers and Weldment revenues from the prior year quarter.
Towers and Weldments segment operating income decreased by $2,212, from $2,773 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $561 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to a lower margin mix of tower sales, the decrease in wind tower sections manufactured, and operating inefficiencies related to new tower and weldments design production start-up in the current year quarter. Operating margin decreased from 11.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to 1.5% during the three months ended June 30, 2012.
The following table summarizes the Gearing segment operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Gearing segment revenues increased by $1,554, from $12,509 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $14,063 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The 12% increase in total revenues was attributable to a 51% increase in industrial sales, partially offset by a 44% decrease in wind gearing sales as compared to the prior year quarter. Gearing sales related to new wind installations was 2% in the three months ended June 30, 2012.
Gearing segment operating loss decreased by $1,215, from $2,847 during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $1,632 during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in operating loss was primarily due to the 12% increase in sales volume and associated increases in margins, lower legal and employee compensation expenses, partially offset by higher restructuring expenses. As a result of the factors described above, operating margin improved from (22.8%) during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to (11.6%) during the three months ended June 30, 2012.