Readers weigh issues of money, accessibility, and proximity to friends and family when deciding whether to move to a smaller home.
PrintCommentRecommend (-)
Bookmark and Share
By Christine Benz | 08-19-12 | 06:00 AM | Email Article

The financial crisis taught many individuals a harsh lesson about casting their financial lots with a single, illiquid asset: their homes. Median household net worth dropped by 35% between 2005 and 2010, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, driven largely by declining property values.

Christine Benz is Morningstar's director of personal finance and author of 30-Minute Money Solutions: A Step-by-Step Guide to Managing Your Finances and the Morningstar Guide to Mutual Funds: 5-Star Strategies for Success. Follow Christine on Twitter: @christine_benz.

Yet home equity still makes up the greatest percentage of net worth in most households, accounting for more than $50,000 of the median household's net worth of $66,740 in 2010. And unlocking that home equity by downsizing is clearly part of the financial plan for many retirees and pre-retirees.

I recently asked participants in the Investing During Retirement forum on Morningstar.com to share their own strategies for home ownership during retirement. Did they plan to relocate to a smaller or more affordable home during retirement, or sit tight in their current abode?

Their responses showcased a range of approaches. Many posters noted that downsizing is very much part of their retirement plans, not just because moving makes good financial sense but also because they'd like to simplify, move to a different part of the country, and/or find a more senior-friendly home. Other readers noted that they plan to stay put at their current residences, even very large homes, because they can't part with their amenities or they love their locations. Still others noted that they don't need to downsize during retirement because they never "upsized" in the first place.

To read the complete thread, or share your own take on the downsizing-during-retirement debate, click here.

'We Wanted to Limit the Financial Bite in Retirement'
A number of posters in the thread said that they had already made the shift to a smaller home. Financial factors weren't the sole motivator for most of these moves, but they were definitely in the mix.

NormanR and his spouse, like many posters, said a little number-crunching--combined with desired lifestyle changes--pointed to the wisdom of scaling back their home space. "We [moved to a condo] because we wanted to limit the financial bite in retirement. Our evaluations included utilities, real estate taxes, and maintenance costs of a home versus a condo."

PaulT53 and his spouse have found that moving to a more modest abode helped free up cash for other pursuits. "We retired three years ago and downsized within a year. When we did the math, it was clear, and we said, 'What are we waiting for?' Our big house was $4,300 a month with taxes, utilities, repairs, insurance, mortgage, and so on. Its sale paid off its remaining mortgage and bought a beautiful new two-bedroom, two-bath, 1,500-square-foot penthouse condo with a 500-square-foot terrace. Our monthly costs are now around $1,500. This, and no more setting money aside for retirement (which we did while working), has given us more discretionary income in retirement than we had during our working years!"

Markyarts and his spouse have also seen a pickup in their discretionary income since they decided to downsize. "[We] sold the large house in northern New Jersey and moved to our small condo on the east coast of central Florida. The condo has no mortgage and the overall carrying costs (taxes, utilities, insurance, and homeowner association fees) are less than $10,000 per year. We paid more than that in real estate taxes alone on the house up north. This low housing cost has given us more discretionary money, and we've been using it for travel."

Markyarts wasn't the only one citing lower property taxes as an advantage of relocation and downsizing. Many posters noted that their homes were long since paid off, but the taxes just keep on coming. Jhamlin wrote, "I already downsized and never looked back. I live in Florida in a gated over-55 community in a ranch type home about 1,200 square feet. Property taxes being a homesteader are about $800 a year--a big difference from New Hampshire where they were $7,000 a year."

Lkosl3 and spouse also expect to see tax savings when they relocate from Long Island. "Taxes and insurance for our small home is approximately $1,000 per month. Thankfully our mortgage is paid. As part of our retirement saving, [we plan to sell] the house and downsize either to an inexpensive rental or co-op down in Florida where we have friends presently living. In Florida, [there is] no state income tax, and the cost of living is reasonable. Our retirement investments will go a lot further."

For Jenny and her husband, the decision to move was driven by a desire to remain on their own for as long as possible. "We recently downsized from a two-story house to an one-story house. Saving money is not the reason in this decision since we do not have mortgage on the old house, and selling the old house will result in capital gains tax. [Editor's Note: You'll only pay capital gains tax on a home sale if your individual gain is greater than $250,000 or $500,000 for couples, provided your sale meets other conditions.] The main reason is to prepare for the old age to be able to live independently as long as possible. An easier maintained home, a safer structure for elderly (no stairs), near shopping, and so on are desirable."

Several posters noted that they weren't just looking to downsize; they were also seeking a home with a floor plan and amenities that fit the way they live now.

Jmat58 wrote, "We want the 'big small house' spacious kitchen and family rooms, bedroom with master bath, and a guest room with bath. No living room, formal dining room, or study."

Less upkeep has been a gift that has kept on giving since SlowMoe and spouse relocated to an apartment in the city. "Anytime we took a trip while we were living in the single-family home I was always worried about the sump pump, the roof, burglars, did my friend mow the lawn, et cetera. The first trip we took after we moved into the apartment it was so nice not to have any concerns about our home. When we walked in the door after our trip [my loving wife] and I looked at each other and smiled; there was nothing that had to be done."

PaulT53 has felt a similar sense of relief. "Another important point to condo ownership is that the monthly fee pays for a very long list of chores and expenses we had with single-family home ownership. Such as lawn mowing/maintenance, landscaping work, snow removal, gutter cleaning, roof repair, water heater issues, plumbing, exterior painting, and so on. We now enjoy extensive travel care-free, relieved of all the home maintenance we once had to do."

Reducing the burden of ongoing upkeep is also a big motivator for ColonelDan and his spouse. "In pursuit of simplicity, increased free time and reduced expense, we'll downsize as yard work on an acre and maintenance of a 3,500 house becomes more than we want to bother with."

Dorameg is thinking about safety, in addition to lower maintenance. " I don't want to be stuck taking care of a large home. Safety is also a big consideration for me. I feel I would be an easy target for burglars and scam artists living alone in my home as I age." 
Securities mentioned in this article

Ticker

Price($)

Change(%)
Morningstar Rating Morningstar Analyst Report
With Morningstar Analyst reports you can get our expert Buy/Sell opinions on over 3,900 Stock and Funds
Christine Benz does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar's editorial policies.
Sponsored Links
Buy a Link Now
Sponsor Center
Content Partners
Morningstar - 2012/08/19 - Is Downsizing Part of Your Retirement Plan? - <a href="http://www.morningstar.com/articles/author/30-christine-benz.aspx">Christine Benz</a>
Name |  Ticker |  Star Rating |  Market Cap |  Stock Type |  Sector |  Industry Star Rating |  Investment Style |  Total Assets |  Category |  Top Holdings |  Top Sectors |  Symbol |  Title Star Rating |  Category |  Total Assets |  Top Holdings |  Top Sectors |  Symbol |  Name Topic |  Sector |  Key Indicators |  User Interest |  Market Cap |  Industry Name |  Ticker |  Star Rating |  Market Cap |  Stock Type |  Sector |  Industry Star Rating |  Investment Style |  Total Assets |  Category |  Top Holdings |  Top Sectors |  Symbol / Ticker |  Title Star Rating |  Category |  Total Assets |  Symbol / Ticker |  Name Title |  Date |  Author |  Collection |  Popularity |  Interest Title |  Date |  Company |  Symbol |  Interest |  Popularity Title |  Date |  Company |  Symbol |  Interest |  Popularity Topic |  Sector |  Key Indicators |  User Interest |  Market Cap |  Industry Name |  Ticker |  Popularity |  Our Choices Title |  Date |  Author |  Collection |  Interest |  Popularity

Previous: Is ApplePay vulnerable to an iHack?  |  Next: Is Facebook doomed to fly too high?