Video Reports

Embed this video

Copy Code

Link to this video

Get LinkEmbedLicenseRecommend (-)Print
Bookmark and Share

By Christine Benz and Russel Kinnel | 10-08-2014 04:00 PM

Active or Passive: A Matter of Expectations?

With the right mind-set, fundholders can succeed with well-run, low-cost active or passive funds, says Morningstar's Russ Kinnel.

Christine Benz: Hi, I'm Christine Benz for What should investors expect from active management? Joining me to discuss that topic is Russ Kinnel. He is director of manager research for Morningstar. Russ, thank you so much for being here.

Russ Kinnel: Good to be here.

Benz: Russ, you look at data on fund performance on a daily basis. When you monitor this question of active versus index, do any trends emerge in terms of where investors should choose index funds and where they should definitely go active?

Kinnel: I think only sort of. I think in small caps and some foreign-market areas, yes. It's true that historically active has done a little better there than, say, in large cap. But I think it's not nearly as dramatic in one direction or the other as people suspect.

Benz: So, when should investors automatically think indexing is a good idea?

Kinnel: I guess I would come at it from a couple of angles. The most important thing is low cost. A low-cost index fund is almost always a good idea. On the other hand, I think you can go at it from a completely different angle and say, "Where can I find some really good, low-cost active funds and use low-cost passive funds to fill in those different spots?"

I don't think it's that important where you go one way or the other. It's a little different, I guess, in intermediate bonds, where passive means a very Treasury, government-heavy portfolio, and active typically means more corporates, maybe some mortgages, maybe some overseas exposure. So, from a planning standpoint, that's also part of the equation as well.

Benz: You maybe get a little more diversification with that actively managed bond portfolio versus buying that Barclays Aggregate Bond Index tracker.

Kinnel: Right, you're really doing some sector- and overall-portfolio positioning when you choose active versus passive in bonds. So, you kind of have two levers going at the same time.

Benz: When we look at the trends in fund flows certainly over the past couple of years--but really five years now--we've seen this strong investor preference for index funds at the expense of active products. Does some of that trade seem a little overdone to you? Do you think perhaps investors are being too black and white about the index-versus-active debate?

Kinnel: Definitely. I think if you go back to '08, which is what everyone's touchstone is on this, both active and passive equity funds get crushed. It's not that active did much worse than passive, but I think there are good funds in both camps. I think you want to be careful either way; you want to get a low-cost fund. You could buy a higher-cost index fund, which doesn't make sense, either. There are a lot of good active funds that are in redemptions right now, and that doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. I think you want to find a good, well-run, low-cost fund and, to me, active versus passive is not the most important part of that equation.

Read Full Transcript
{0}-{1} of {2} Comments
{0}-{1} of {2} Comment
  • This post has been reported.
  • Comment removed for violation of Terms of Use ({0})
    Please create a username to comment on this article