Video Reports

Embed this video

Copy Code

Link to this video

Get LinkEmbedLicenseRecommend (-)Print
Bookmark and Share

By Jeremy Glaser and Greggory Warren, CFA | 04-28-2014 03:00 PM

Plenty of Gas Left in Berkshire's Acquisition Tank

Despite high stock valuations and the lack of a marquee buyout recently, Buffett and Munger are willing to be creative to put cash to work.

Jeremy Glaser: For Morningstar, I'm Jeremy Glaser. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has been mostly making smaller bolt-on acquisitions recently instead of some of the larger deals that they've done in the past. Does this mean they're finding it hard to deploy their giant cash hoard? I'm here today with Gregg Warren, our analyst for Berkshire to see what the state of capital allocation is within the businesses.

Gregg, thanks for joining me today.

Gregg Warren: Thanks for having me.

Glaser: Like we mentioned, there haven't been any huge acquisitions this past year. We had Heinz and NV Energy recently and, obviously BNSF in the not-so-distant past. Why do you think that is? Is it just that these deals have become too expensive for Buffett?

Warren: I think in a lot of ways, with the market running up since early 2009--it's over 100% at this point--it's made it a lot more difficult. Valuations are certainly a lot higher. When we looked at the NV Energy deal last year, it was at the higher end of valuations overall. It wasn't that small of a deal, but it certainly wasn't enough to put a dent in Berkshire's cash.

The same thing with Heinz. It was an interesting deal; it was structured differently than a lot of the deals we've seen from Berkshire in the past. Berkshire took a 50% equity stake with a private equity firm, and then invested $8 billion into preferred stock in Heinz and that sort of guaranteed an income stream from that business.

But overall, there haven't been, say, Burlington Northern-size deals in the last few years, and that meant, in a lot of ways these guys have had to go out and do a lot of bolt-on acquisitions. You've had Lubrizol doing a lot of deals over the past year, you had McLane doing deals over the past year. Marmon's been involved in some restructuring and some other deals. Even MidAmerican, aside from Nevada Energy, they've done a lot of stuff where they've bought some solar assets out of bankruptcy and have been making some heavier investments in renewables.

There's definitely money being put to work. It's just not a big, single deal.

Glaser: When you are the size of Berkshire, you need to put a lot of money to work in order to keep all of that cash productive. Do you think that they actually can do that these days? Should they be returning more of it to shareholders?

Warren: I think the biggest conundrum for Berkshire here is what do they do with the excess cash on the books? And when we look back over the last, say, eight or 10 calendar quarters, they've probably been carrying about $40 billion to $50 billion in cash on the books.

Now, you subtract out about $20 billion that they'd like to keep as a backstop for the insurance business--and we don't disagree with that; we think that's good, sound business practice--but you still are looking at anywhere from $20 billion-$30 billion in cash sitting there earning nothing in a low-interest-rate environment. Technically, it is sort of dry powder for investments; it's also capital that's available for share repurchases. The problem is the shares have not gotten down to the level at which Berkshire is willing to buy them.

And when we look at the environment out there for big deals, Buffett's talked about looking at some deals here and there, looking at some big elephants, but not really being able to pull the trigger. And the question in our regard is, "What's the opportunity cost of that cash just sitting there?" It becomes problematic for them in the long run.

I think this is probably one of those topics that's going to come up at the meeting again this year. If you're retaining earnings but you're not doing anything with it, doesn't it make sense to give it to shareholders. And if you don't think that the stock is attractively enough priced to buy back shares, then maybe a special dividend or one-time dividend as a solution--I'm not saying to initiate a dividend and then commit to one longer term--but maybe returning some of that excess cash to shareholders in a special dividend might be the best way to go.

Read Full Transcript
{0}-{1} of {2} Comments
{0}-{1} of {2} Comment
  • This post has been reported.
  • Comment removed for violation of Terms of Use ({0})
    Please create a username to comment on this article