Video Reports

Embed this video

Copy Code

Link to this video

Get LinkEmbedLicenseRecommend (-)Print
Bookmark and Share

By Christine Benz | 06-14-2013 11:00 AM

Bruno: 4% Rule a Good Starting Point, but Mind Allocation

Many retirees are creating hybrid withdrawal plans--with ceilings and floors--to adjust for market volatility, but a balanced portfolio is key amid fluctuating rates, says Vanguard's Maria Bruno.

Christine Benz: Hi. I’m Christine Benz for How to find a sustainable withdrawal rate is a hot topic in retirement-planning circles. Joining me to discuss it is Maria Bruno. She is senior investment analyst with Vanguard.

Maria, thank you so much for being here.

Maria Bruno: Thank you. Good to be here.

Benz: Maria, there has been a lot of talk about whether that old 4% rule is perhaps too high, given that bond yields are so low and bonds are supposed to be a key ingredient in retiree portfolios. Let's talk about Vanguard’s take on that question. I know that you and your team have done a lot of research on withdrawal rates. Do you think that 4% is perhaps too high?

Bruno: We have [done a lot of research], Christine. We’ve looked at this much like other organizations have, as well. We do believe 4% is still a good starting point, and it’s a reasonable starting point. But you really need to think about the factors that come into play into that formula. A couple of things that come into mind is the portfolio composition. If you think about the premise of this rule and what is baked into that rule of thumb--and we really think of that in terms of it being a rule of thumb--the asset allocation. So it assumes that the portfolio is balanced. So there is some level of equities within that portfolio.

The thought behind it is that it produces a somewhat stable income stream over 30-plus years with a high probability of not depleting your portfolio during that time frame. The big consideration in today’s environment is the low-interest-rate environment. What does this mean? Does that still resonate, or what are the challenges? It is certainly a consideration, and that’s a struggle for retirees today with the interest rates being so low. But if you think about it in terms of not investing for income, but investing for total return--again, this notion of being in a balanced portfolio, so you’re drawing from the income flows, but also the capital appreciation that the equities can offer--finding that right balance really is client-specific, but some level of equities will help with that, as well.

If you look at 2012, for instance, a balanced portfolio using just benchmark returns--for instance, 50% total stock, 50% total bond--it was about a 10% return. So if you think about that in the context of someone who is spending, certainly that’s not coming all from income. But it does afford potentially the opportunity to take from appreciation, as well, and those two components come together in terms of trying to provide a somewhat steady income stream.

Benz: So that’s a shift in mind-set for a lot of retired investors. They maybe are thinking, "Well, if I can just earn a 5% yield on this portfolio, I’ll be set." They’re really quite averse to the idea of tapping their principal. Do you do any work in terms of educating people about how to get comfortable with potentially tapping principal if in fact you’ve seen a great appreciation in your equities?

Bruno:  Yeah. I’ve worked with clients through the years, and this conversation always has to be had, which is really "Where is this income flow, the distributions, coming from?" This wasn’t an issue prior to 2000. For instance, yields were high. So retirees were used to taking income from the portfolio, and quite possibly they could have been net accumulators reinvesting the surpluses. So it’s really become more of an issue as the interest rates have come down. 

So it’s really talking about this balance, and rather than investing for income, because there is danger there in terms of portfolio diversification and portfolio longevity, it’s trying to get back to the basics of having a diversified portfolio and setting up the mechanics. You can do it systematically, like a systematic withdrawal program, where you have income flows that are both the dividends, but also potentially withdrawals. The key there is just to make sure that there are prudent spending levels because certainly if you are spending too high, or not monitoring the spending, you need to really consider the portfolio as a whole. That’s where the danger signs are. But with modest spending both from the income flows and potential appreciation, the two can come together to try and provide that steady income.

Read Full Transcript

{0}-{1} of {2} Comments
{0}-{1} of {2} Comment
  • This post has been reported.
  • Comment removed for violation of Terms of Use ({0})
    Please create a username to comment on this article