Home>Video>Fund Flows Not Always Written in the Stars

Fund Flows Not Always Written in the Stars

Thu, 15 May 2014

Although 4- and 5-star funds see strong inflows, funds that have yet to receive a Morningstar Rating have attracted the most assets.

+

Video Transcript

Mike Rawson: Investors tend to put their money in funds that have had good performance. So when we look at fund flows by star rating, we see that the 4- and 5-star funds attract a lot of assets, while there are actually outflows from 1- and 2-star funds.

It's important to remember that the star rating is a past risk-adjusted measure of performance. It's not an opinion about how well the fund is going to do in the future. This pattern of investors choosing funds that have had good recent performance, it really indicates a couple of things. First of all, it indicates that investors maybe have an easier time buying into a fund that has had good performance. If you're going to a financial advisor, it might be easier for him to sell a fund that has had good performance. That's the downside. The positive side is that funds that have had good past performance tend to be lower-cost. So investors may also be picking funds that have low costs, and those low-cost funds are more likely to have good performance in the future.

Another noticeable feature about fund flows is that funds that do not yet have a star rating actually received the strongest flows overall. These are funds which have not been around for three years, so we can't yet assign a star rating to them. So it's important to remember that if a fund doesn't have a track record that often it's those funds that have poor performance, the 1- and 2-star-rated funds, which are shut down and may be replaced by a new fund. So when assessing funds to invest in, investors should try to understand why a fund maybe does not have a star rating. If it's a new fund, these are the kind of funds which are often heavily marketed toward investors.

It's important to remember that the star rating is just one measure of performance. There are other metrics that investors should analyze before picking a fund. 4- and 5-star funds have had good past performance, but that's no guarantee that they are going to have good performance in the future. Meanwhile, a fund that does not yet have a star rating basically means that the fund has not been around for three years, so it has not yet had a performance track record on which to judge it.

  1. Related Videos
  2. Related Articles
  3. Comments
  1. Benz: My Favorite Boring Funds

    Boring investments tend to keep people in their seats, which leads to better outcomes, says Morningstar's director of personal finance .

  2. Signs Pointing to Better Jobs Report

    Recent data are suggesting slightly improving employment conditions, which bodes well for the April report, says Morningstar's Bob Johnson.

  3. The Friday Five

    Draghi drops a hint, Whole Foods takes a hit, and Alibaba's impending IPO raises questions for Yahoo.

  4. Berkshire Solidly on Track

    Morningstar's Gregg Warren, who posed questions at Berkshire's annual meeting this year, says Buffett's and Munger's answers underscored our confidence in the company's moat.

  5. The Friday Five

    Two-speed recovery complications in Europe, Wal-Mart's woes, and questions about a different beat at Apple.

  6. Value Runs Deep at Loomis Sayles Bond

    The Gold-rated fund's strong research team and patient, flexible approach with the portfolio are some of the secrets to its success, says Morningstar's Sarah Bush.

  7. Burning Questions for Buffett

    Coke's compensation package and Berkshire's new specialty insurance business are just some of the topics that will come up at this year's Woodstock for Capitalists.

  8. The Friday Five

    Still gas in the tank for Apple, Facebook gets mobile mojo, a possible wide-moat combination, and more.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Upcoming Events
Conferences
Webinars

©2014 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.