Home>Video>Will the Recent Supreme Court Decision Improve 401(k)s?

Will the Recent Supreme Court Decision Improve 401(k)s?

Fri, 5 Jun 2015

Investors stand to benefit from recent 401(k) fee litigation, says Morningstar's Scott Cooley.


Video Transcript

Jeremy Glaser: For Morningstar, I'm Jeremy Glaser. I'm joined today by Scott Cooley--he is our director of policy research. We'll look at the recent Supreme Court case that found that plan sponsors have a continuing obligation to look at 401(k) fee levels. Scott, thanks for joining me.

Scott Cooley: Thank you.

Glaser: Let's start by taking a look at what this court case actually entailed. What was in front of the court?

Cooley: The case was Tibble v. Edison International. Edison is a 401(k) plan sponsor, so it provides a 401(k) to its employees. It had a number of funds in its 401(k) plan that were retail share classes, even though it qualified for institutional share classes. So, the plaintiffs alleged that the employer had a continuing obligation to monitor the funds and make sure that the employees were benefiting from the lowest-cost share class. Edison's defense was that these funds were picked many years ago and that, essentially, the statute of limitations had expired. The court actually sided with the plaintiffs.

Glaser: Now that they have this decision, what impact is it going to have on plan sponsors? Is this kind of an immediate thing or more of a long-term issue to watch out for?

Cooley: There's been a lot of fee litigation around 401(k) plans, so I think this is just kind of another step in those sorts of cases. So, yes, plan sponsors have to be very vigilant about making sure that employees are benefiting from the lowest-cost share classes. Now, what the long-term implications are, we'll have to see. First of all, the court didn't really decide anything other than that the case could proceed. The gist of it was that it couldn't be knocked down on a technicality. We'll see what the ultimate finding is [as the litigation continues]. I think there could be a few other consequences. For one thing, some plan sponsors might tend to favor lower-cost index funds just to protect themselves from this kind of litigation.

Glaser: [Zooming out] from this case to the 401(k) landscape, do you think this is a step in the right direction to making plan sponsors have more responsibility to think about fee levels?

Cooley: I think it's probably a step in the right direction. We'll have to see exactly how this is implemented. Theoretically, a plan sponsor could shift the employees into all of the lowest-cost share classes and then just make up the difference in fees by assessing a per-participant fee or something like that. So, we need to track this over time and make sure that the employees really are benefiting from the lower costs.

Glaser: Are there any unintended consequences that you could see here other than maybe a new fee stream?

Cooley: Some people have speculated that plan sponsors might be quicker to kick out underperforming active funds. They have this continuing obligation to monitor the funds--not just on the expenses but on the performance side, too--and there are some concerns that, potentially, funds could be kicked out of 401(k) plans for kind of transient reasons because employers want to show that they are being vigilant. That might not be the best long-term solution for investors.

Glaser: But overall, do you think that, generally, this is a win for investors and that this should force maybe some of the higher-cost funds out of these plans?

Cooley: Yes, I think, most likely, it's a win for investors. We know that fees can be very corrosive of long-term returns. So, it seems like if this really does result in lower costs for investors, it's a good thing.

Glaser: Scott, I certainly appreciate your take on this case today.

Cooley: Thank you.

Glaser: For Morningstar, I'm Jeremy Glaser. Thanks for watching. 

  1. Related Videos
  2. Related Articles
  1. What You Can Do About a Lousy 401 (k ) Plan

    If your plan has high fees, no company match, or poor investment choices, let the data do the talking and be politely persistent, says Morningstar's Christine Benz.

  2. Union Pacific: A Good Bet for the Long Haul

    Coal headwinds should only be temporary for wide-moat Union Pacific, which gives it an advantage over other rail companies, says Morningstar's Matt Coffina.

  3. 7 Habits of Successful Investors

    Special presentation: Learn how 'cheaping out,' building in discipline, and other simple steps help successful investors get it done.

  4. Hasenstab: Flexibility Key in Global Bonds

    The Templeton Global manager discusses recent Europe bond volatility, the outlook for the dollar and emerging markets, plus the need for a dynamic approach to international bonds.

  5. Dividend Investors: Time to Rethink Tech Stocks ?

    Although companies such as IBM and Apple have been increasing return to shareholders, the long -term resilience of these businesses remains uncertain, says Morningstar's Josh Peters.

  6. Is Dividend Investing Right for You?

    The predictable income and total return of a dividend-stock portfolio is suitable for retirees and savers alike, says Morningstar's Josh Peters.

  7. New Fiduciary Rule More Pro-Investor Than Previous Iteration

    The Department of Labor's final rule should be easier to implement and drive more dollars to low-cost investments, says Morningstar's Scott Cooley .

  8. How to Make the Most of Your 401 (k )

    In this special presentation, get the answers to key questions about the quality of your plan, whether your savings are on track with your goals, how to allocate assets, and what to do with assets when you leave your job.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.