Recent developments mean good news for the firms' institutional clients.
Capital Group, the parent company to American Funds, recently announced a series of changes designed to mitigate branding confusion while also shoring up the firm's institutional business. The firm is reorganizing its sales and services teams, with clients now interacting with a single point of contact versus multiple ones that were previously organized by distribution channels. Capital also unveiled a new branding plan, consolidating numerous sister company monikers in favor of just two: Capital Group and American Funds by Capital Group.
The changes are more noteworthy for Capital's institutional clients than for its mutual fund investors, as the changes appear to be partly driven by performance challenges and outflows in the firm's institutional business. That's largely apparent in the firm's reorganization of its equity investment teams, a process first started in mid-2012 (and covered last summer in a Fund Times article you can view here). Whereas the firm's mutual fund and institutional accounts have been split into legally distinct and independent entities since 1998, that hard-line distinction will go away.
While Capital's mutual fund and institutional equity teams were producing research independently from one another, the strengths conferred by their common organizational culture--including Capital's long-term investing orientation and highly stable and experienced investment professionals--theoretically should have resulted in investment teams with comparable skills. Results of similar strategies across various offerings have sometimes left room for doubt, though. For example, while American Funds Growth Fund of America
Institutional investors now will be able to access mutual fund strategies (and their investment teams) through separate accounts and collective investment trusts. To facilitate this, the firm has continued to shuffle a few of its portfolio managers and analysts between the equity teams. Managers for a few of the mutual funds now draw their investment ideas from the team previously dedicated to institutional mandates.
These changes occur following years of substantial asset outflows; investors pulled out $62 billion in mutual fund assets in 2012, for example, and there have been numerous high-profile client defections that particularly have affected the firm's institutional business. By many accounts, the investment teams remain unruffled by those flows, and their strong culture helped to ensure that things remained business as usual. But these changes suggest that even Capital can be swayed to adapt in the face of a declining institutional business and weak performance.
Putnam Broadens Fund Lineup
Putnam Investments is expanding its mutual fund lineup. The Boston-based firm announced that it will launch six new funds: Putnam Low Volatility Equity PLVEX, Putnam Strategic Volatility Equity PSVEX, Putnam Global Dividend PGDEX, Putnam Emerging Markets Income PEMWX, Putnam Short-Term Municipal Income PSMEX, and Putnam Intermediate-Term Municipal Income PIMEX. Some of the launches reflect a familiar trend of Putnam bringing to the retail market strategies that have been running in institutional or other accounts. For example, Global Dividend manager Darren Jaroch will implement a strategy that largely mirrors the one he runs that is sold to Japanese clients. (Jaroch also manages Putnam Equity Income
JPMorgan Value Funds to Merge
JPMorgan is planning to merge JPMorgan Value Opportunities JVOIX into JPMorgan Large Cap Value HLQVX, pending the approval of Value Opportunities' shareholders. The merger makes sense. While the funds have different histories, both have been run by Aryeh Glatter using the same strategy since 2011 and the portfolios are virtually identical. While each fund on its own has more than $600 million in assets, a combined asset base would not be excessive given Glatter's large-cap focus.
Value Opportunities shareholders will receive Large Cap Value shares of the same class. (Institutional shareholders will receive R5 shares.) While the acquired class has lower net expenses than the acquiring class, JPMorgan will maintain the net expense level in effect prior to the merger until Oct. 31, 2014.