• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Practice Management>Retiring With Natalie Choate>Ins and Outs of Taking Required Minimum Distributions From Multiple Plans

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. The Friday Five

    Five stats from the market and the stories behind them. This week: Samsung enters a new Galaxy, Yum serves improved China sales, inflows continue into bonds, and more.

  2. Apple's Core Business Remains Solid

    New hit products could provide some upside for Apple but aren't needed to support the current valuation, says Morningstar's Brian Colello.

  3. Paying Up and Paying Out

    News this week showed market players paying up for media assets, paying out for tax relief, and more.

  4. Apple's Valuation Still Compelling

    Despite a mixed bag in the tech giant's fiscal first quarter, the firm's growing earnings power makes Apple shares attractive, says Morningstar's Brian Colello.

Ins and Outs of Taking Required Minimum Distributions From Multiple Plans

From a distance, taking required minimum distributions looks easy, but up close it's more complicated.

Natalie Choate, 07/11/2014

Question: I'm turning 70 1/2 this year, so I know I have to start taking required minimum distributions. I have a self-employed profit-sharing plan ("Keogh plan") for my business (I'm the sole owner) and two IRAs--my own IRA plus an IRA I inherited from my father. Can I take the RMD for all these accounts from my dad's IRA? 

Answer: No, you cannot. 

Generally speaking each retirement plan or account must distribute its own RMD, and you cannot take a distribution from one plan that counts toward your RMD from another plan. 

In the case of the profit-sharing plan, for example, that is a "qualified plan," so it must pay you your RMD from that plan or risk losing its IRS qualified status. If you had two profit-sharing plans, each one would have to pay its own RMD. Taking a distribution from one profit-sharing plan does not give you any credit toward your RMDs from any other plan. 

With IRAs, there is more flexibility: Generally you can take your IRA distributions from whichever IRA you want (see the next question). But that flexibility does not extend to inherited IRAs. If you are holding an IRA as beneficiary, you must take RMDs attributable to that inherited IRA from that account. A distribution from in inherited IRA cannot be used to fulfill the distribution requirement for your own IRA and vice versa. 

And there's more! If you inherit multiple IRAs from your father, you could total your RMDs for all of them and take the combined amount from any one or more of them. But you cannot not use distributions from an IRA inherited from your father to satisfy the distribution requirement for your own IRA or for the distribution requirement applicable to IRAs you inherited from someone else. 

So if you inherited one IRA from your mother and another IRA from your father, you would have to take the RMDs for the IRA inherited from each parent only from IRAs inherited from that parent. Even if you cashed out the entire IRA you inherited from your father you would still have to take that year's distribution from the IRA you inherited from your mother! 

Question: I am turning age 75 this year, so, as usual, I have to take an RMD. I have five IRAs. They are all my own IRAs; I don't have any inherited IRAs. Your book says that I don't have to take the RMDs for each IRA separately. Rather, I should compute the RMD separately for each IRA, but once I get the combined total, I can take that total from any one or more of the five accounts. Why can't I just add up the combined prior year-end value of the five accounts then compute the 2014 RMD once, based on that combined total? Why do I have to first compute it separately for each account? 

Answer: You can usually do it either way. In most cases you will get the same result. There are two (unusual) situations where the RMDs from one of a person's IRA will be computed in a different manner than the rest of his IRAs. Because of that unusual possibility, the formula states that you compute the RMD for each IRA separately and then take the combined total from whichever IRA or IRAs you want. Here are the two situations: 

  1. Much younger spouse beneficiary. If the participant's spouse is more than 10 years younger than the participant, and is the sole beneficiary of the IRA, the participant's RMDs for that IRA are computed using the IRS' Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table (based on joint age of the participant and spouse) rather than the usual Uniform Lifetime Table everybody else uses. If the participant has a spouse who is more than 10 years younger and named as a sole beneficiary of one of his IRAs, but that participant has other IRAs with other beneficiaries, the RMD formula for the spouse-beneficiary IRA will be different from the RMD formula for the others.
  2. Large losses in one IRA. The RMD for an IRA is actually the usual amount computed according to the formula, or, if less, the entire value of the account on the date of distribution. For example, suppose Jimmy, age 75, has three IRAs. On Dec. 31 of the prior year, each IRA was worth $100,000. In March of this year, before Jimmy had taken any distributions, one of the IRAs suddenly became worthless because of investment losses. The minimum distribution for the now-worthless IRA is zero, which is the lesser of the RMD as computed by the usual formula and the value of the account on the date of distribution.

As you can see, computing the RMD separately for each IRA produces a different result in these two situations than would computing the RMD based on the combined total of all the accounts. That's why the formula says, compute the RMD for each IRA separately. But for most people most of the time, the result is the same whether you compute the distribution separately for each account or just add up all the values from before Dec. 31 and compute the minimum distribution based on the combined total. 

Where to read more: For more detail on how to compute and pay minimum required distributions, see Chapter 1 of the author's book Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits (Ataxplan Publications; 7th ed. 2011).

Natalie Choate will be speaking at a location near you if you live in Portland, Maine (Sept. 16, 2014); Florham Park, NJ (Sept. 18, 2014); St. Louis (Sept. 22, 2014); Minneapolis (Oct. 1, 2014); Atlanta (Oct. 13, 2014); Springfield, MA (October 8, 2014); Plymouth, Mich. (Nov. 18, 2014); or Washington, D.C. (Dec. 4, 2014). See all of Natalie's upcoming speaking events at http://www.ataxplan.com/seminars/schedule.cfm.

Natalie Choate practices law in Boston with Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, specializing in estate planning for retirement benefits. Her book, Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits, is a leading resource for professionals in this field.

The author is not an employee of Morningstar, Inc. The views expressed in this article are the author's. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Morningstar. The author is a freelance contributor to MorningstarAdvisor.com. The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect the views of Morningstar.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Upcoming Events
Conferences
Webinars

©2014 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.