Larger asset bases could curtail flexibility.
PIMCO may be starting to wonder whether it planted two of its trees too close to the house. The funds in question, PIMCO All Asset
Of course, this isn't a proper comparison because the two All Asset funds, both managed by industry veteran Rob Arnott, are funds of funds. More specifically, they're funds of PIMCO funds. So, any inflows that the All Asset funds receive ultimately pass through to the 40 or so underlying PIMCO funds Arnott employs in his absolute return strategies. Nevertheless, while only 11% of PIMCO's $573 billion in mutual fund assets can be traced to these two funds, their nearly $17 billion in inflows over the past 12 months accounted for close to a fourth of the firm's total inflows and about 30% of January 2013's estimated $9 billion in new money. Their popularity and impact on the firm are clearly growing.
Their appeal is obvious, especially these days. In some ways, they seem like perfect antidotes to the current anxiety-inducing, low-yield environment. That's particularly true for income-seeking investors who would rather keep equity exposure to a minimum. The two funds have delivered robust income streams and equitylike returns without equitylike volatility. In fact, through January both funds have beaten the world-allocation category average and the MSCI AC World Index by more than a percentage point annualized since their respective 2002-2003 inceptions. That's particularly impressive considering that equity exposure has rarely been much more than 20% of assets for either. That partly explains why they've also been among the category's least-volatile options. What's not to love?
Impact of One Customer
One potential problem with the funds' increasing size and popularity is the impact on the underlying PIMCO funds. As the two All Asset funds continue to grow, they become a larger share of the underlying funds' asset bases. While positions in individual underlying funds rarely consume more than 14% or so of the All Asset portfolios, even a 10% position across the two funds would claim more than $6 billion of a PIMCO fund's underlying asset base. That would be at least a fourth of assets of every PIMCO fund, with Total Return the sole exception.
But even that understates the impact. That's because of the leverage used by All Asset All Authority. Arnott uses leverage in that fund in an effort to add 1.5 percentage points of return over the long term. However, while leverage typically means more volatility, Arnott has used it responsibly thus far as All Asset All Authority has actually been the steadier of the two funds. That's partly due to the fact that he allocates a portion of the leverage to PIMCO StocksPlus Short Strategy PSSDX (9.9% of assets as of Sept. 30, 2012) as an offsetting hedge against the fund's equity exposure. Arnott used that fund to presciently take All Asset All Authority's net equity exposure to negative 5% of assets heading into 2011's tumultuous third quarter.
Nevertheless, All Asset All Authority's leverage increases its investable assets, adding to the potential strain on the underlying funds. At the end of January 2013, gross leverage stood at 24.6% of that fund's $31 billion in assets. This took the fund's investable asset base to $38.7 billion and the two funds' combined assets to $71.6 billion.
That's $8.5 billion more than the funds collectively held as recently as September 2012, the latest month for which PIMCO has disclosed individual positions. At that time there were 41 underlying funds between the two portfolios. The two All Asset funds accounted for more than 25% of assets for 26 of the funds. More strikingly, the duo claimed 75% or more of assets for 10 of the funds. (See the table.) This includes notable offerings such as PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency