• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Research & Insights>Investment Insights>Trouble With the (Yield) Curve

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. Measuring Moats in Social Media

    Twitter , Facebook , LinkedIn , and Google each have moats, but there are some interesting distinctions among their competitive advantages.

  2. Facebook a Future Advertising Force

    Morningstar's Rick Summer sees Facebook and Google dominating the Internet advertising market as Facebook finds better ways to monetize its massive user base.

  3. Facebook's $100 Billion Valuation May Not Be Heroic

    It will be a volatile ride, but Facebook's strong competitive advantages and growth opportunities could be the recipe for a hefty valuation, says Morningstar's Rick Summer.

  4. Why Twitter Can't Be Facebook

    With lower user time spent on its platform and user data collected, Twitter's ad revenue has constraints versus Facebook , and investors should moderate their expectations.

Trouble With the (Yield) Curve

Because interest rates do not always move in tandem, investors need to pay close attention to the yield curve and spreads to gauge risk.

Thomas Boccellari, 05/27/2015

A version of this article was originally published on Oct. 8, 2014.

The term "interest rate" continues to strike fear into the hearts of bond investors. These fears have only intensified as the timing of an increase to the federal-funds rate has (supposedly) drawn nearer. After all, as interest rates rise, most bonds' prices decline.

Investors often use duration to estimate a bond's interest-rate sensitivity. It approximates the change in a bond's price for an incremental interest-rate change. For example, a bond with a duration of five years might lose 5% of its value for a 1% increase in interest rates--holding all else equal. However, this approximation is only accurate for small and parallel changes in interest rates across the yield curve.

The yield curve, in its simplest form, shows interest rates at a point in time for U.S. Treasuries with differing maturities.


 

In normal markets, as the time to maturity increases so does the yield. This is intuitive because interest-rate risk tends to increase with maturity, and investors demand compensation for this risk. Investors' expectations of future short-term rates also influence the shape of the yield curve. If investors believe short-term rates will fall in the near term, the yield curve may become flat, or even inverted, where long-term interest rates are lower than short-term rates. A flattening or inverted yield curve is often interpreted as a sign that the economy is starting to cool and that the Fed may start to lower short-term rates. In contrast, a steepening yield curve usually points to a strong economy with increased inflation expectations.

With all of these variables at work, interest-rate changes are rarely linear. We can break changes in the yield curve into three components: changes in the level of rates (which is usually the most important), slope of the yield curve, and its curvature. The slope of the yield curve measures the difference between short- and long-term yields. When there is a twist in the yield curve, it is becoming flatter or steeper. The curvature of the yield curve can change when short- and long-term rates move more than intermediate-term rates, or vice versa.

In the chart above, the yield curve is considered steep because of the large difference between long- and short-term interest rates. This is partially due to the Fed's decision to keep the federal-funds rate near zero. With fear that the Fed may begin to increase the federal-funds rate, investors should pay close attention to how the yield curve moves.

For example, during the last increase in the federal-funds rate in June 2004, the curve began to flatten. During the next two years, the yield curve continued to flatten and eventually inverted.

This is an important concept because it shows that short-term bond funds are not always the safest investment in a rising interest-rate environment. It is possible that short-term interest rates rise while long-term rates remain the same or even fall. For instance, from February through September 2014, the five-year Treasury yield increased to 1.78% from 1.44%, and the 30-year Treasury yield decreased to 3.21% from 3.55%. During this time period, iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond IEI (4.6-year duration) lost 0.41% while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond TLT (17.1-year duration) gained 6.36%.

The table below shows that the price performance of a bond fund depends on the interest-rate change of comparable maturity. When a fund's comparable Treasury yield increased, like the two- and five-year Treasury, its price declined. Conversely, when a fund's comparable Treasury yield decreased, like the 10-, 20-, and 30-year Treasury, those funds' prices increased. It's not enough to know interest rates might rise--investors must know what interest rate will move, and by how much.

Corporate Bonds and Mortgages
Corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities add an additional layer of complexity to interest-rate sensitivity because, in addition to interest-rate risk, investors' tolerance for credit risk also affects their interest rates. These bonds must offer higher yields than duration-matched Treasuries to compensate investors for the risk that the borrower might default. This is known as the credit risk premium.

Much like the Treasury yield curve, corporate-bond and MBS spreads are not always consistent and can move differently across different credit qualities and maturities. For instance, the spreads between the yields of Aaa and Baa corporate bonds during the past 20 years, as measured by the difference between the Moody's Seasoned Aaa Corporate Bond and Moody's Seasoned Baa Corporate Bond indexes' yields relative to the 20-year Treasury, has varied between 0.5% and 3.4%.

Investors might have expected iShares Intermediate Credit Bond's CIU price (4.7-year average maturity) to decline like iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond as the five-year Treasury yield increased. However, CIU appreciated as corporate credit spreads continued to tighten relative to Treasuries. While corporate bonds of similar maturity to Treasury bonds generally have smaller durations because of their higher yields, it is possible that they could lose more value if the risk-premium widens. Click here for Morningstar's David Sekera's latest bond market outlook.

Options for Rising Rates
Ultra-short-term bond investors will be protected from most interest-rate changes. While the chance for principal loss is small, investors should pay attention to yield to maturity and costs, which can erode most--if not all--of an investor's returns. For example, SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF BIL takes virtually no credit and interest-rate risk. However, its 0.1368% expense ratio is greater than its yield to maturity (0.01%), which virtually guarantees a negative return.

Short-term bond investors should consider investment-grade floating-rate bond funds like iShares Floating Rate Bond FLOT. While traditional fixed-coupon bonds pay a consistent income stream, their prices adjust down when interest rates rise. In contrast, floating-rate bonds' payments adjust with interest rates, so their prices don't have to.

Investors may want to avoid funds in the intermediate-term bond Morningstar Category, like iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond AGG, because of their sensitivity to rising rates. While they have less sensitivity to interest rates than long-term bond funds, intermediate-term interest rates have historically increased more in rising interest-rate environments as the yield curve flattens.

While long-term interest rates have historically had little sensitivity to short-term interest-rate increases, long-term bonds still have great sensitivity to even small changes in long-term interest rates. Investors who need access to their capital in the short- to intermediate-term should avoid long-term bonds because of the increased risk of principal loss. They may still be appropriate for long-term investors because the higher coupon payment can help offset principal losses and provide greater total returns in the long run.


Disclosure: Morningstar, Inc.'s Investment Management division licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. Please click here for a list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its investment management division markets, sells, or makes any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.

 

is an ETF Analyst with Morningstar.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Upcoming Events
Conferences
Webinars

©2014 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.