• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Model Portfolios for January 2013

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. 2012 Tide Lifts Vanguard's Boats

    Although some Vanguard funds underperformed their peers during the market rally, the firm had more portfolios in the top quartile of their categories than in the bottom quartile.

  2. 2012 Tide Lifts Vanguard's Boats

    Although some Vanguard funds underperformed their peers during the market rally, the firm had more portfolios in the top quartile of their categories than in the bottom quartile.

  3. The Picks Panel: Best Ideas From Morningstar Analysts

    Whether you need to fill a hole in your retirement portfolio or want to find a world-class company at a bargain-basement stock price, a trio of Morningstar specialists share their shopping lists of topnotch candidates.

  4. Why Vanguard Was Hard to Beat in 2014

    It was tough for active managers to outpace Vanguard's low-cost index funds in 2014, and many of its active funds also outperformed.

Model Portfolios for January 2013


Now that the final day of 2012 has come and gone, we can confidently pass judgment on how long-term investors in both stock and bond funds have fared. And, likely, for most, there has been a myriad of opportunities to be successful, as I will point to below. But more importantly, I will focus on how I recommend investors might set up a Model Portfolio for the year ahead.

In short, it has been almost nothing short of a terrific year for long-term investors. Of course, there were, as always, short-term considerations that might have suggested not staying invested to the maximum of one’s “ideal” asset allocation, which for many people could be as easy as constructing, and continuing to maintain, a simple 60/40% split between stocks and bonds.

No matter how many times it’s been said before, however, many people still ignore the dictum of “don’t try to time the markets” (and, I would add, try to outguess how it may react to specific events). Otherwise, every time something might arise such as the now infamous “fiscal cliff,” some market followers will choose to adhere to conventional thinking and use the event as an excuse to either pull back from existing investments or merely sit on the sidelines, afraid to invest.

Of course, scary events can indeed impact the markets, reinforcing the belief that market timing can be successful. But such fear-induced drops are usually short-lived, with not much accomplished for the pulled-back or pulled-out investor. Realistically, unless you are willing to become a trader focusing on these relatively short-term down (or up) movements, the investor who attempts to sidestep potential potholes will more than likely be missing out when the blip disappears, as it so often does.

Such up and down movements of stocks and bonds can often mask the bigger picture. For example, try to suppose you had never heard of the term “fiscal cliff” along with its potential for a big downdraft for the stock market. If the fearful premise had proven correct, surely you would now be able to recognize its existence in the following five year graph of the S&P 500 Index:

There have been a few drops big enough to stand out over the past five years but the effect of the fiscal cliff over the period is not one of them. In fact, the S&P 500 instead rose over 5% between Nov. 15th and year end, a period of high drama for the fiscal cliff negotiations.

Of course, some may argue that when events such as the fiscal cliff seem to be dominant, they are not trying to time the market, just to be prudent in the face of the real possibility of losses. But, in truth, whenever one tries to jump out, jump in, avoid the market, or embrace it based on events that are likely be a factor for perhaps only 6 months or less, they may risk missing the bigger picture which frequently dominates an investment cycle, lasting from anywhere between 1 and 5 years, or even more.

So clearly, long-term investors should feel good about where they are at the start of 2013 in spite of having just traveled down what might have appeared from a shorter-term perspective as a treacherous course. (The extent to which investors in well-chosen funds have profited over 2012 may be seen in my Jan. 2013 Newsletter at my web site.) It all seems to suggest that investors should mainly focus on picking quality funds from undervalued categories, rather than being influenced by the vagaries of public opinion, fears stirred up by politicians and even some economists, as well as overly simplified predictions of where stocks and/or bonds may be headed.

With this in mind, let’s turn to what my research now suggests are good choices looking forward.

January 2013 Model Portfolios
My overall allocations to stocks, bonds, and cash remain unchanged from last quarter (see our 4th quarter 2012 Model Portfolios). However, there are some significant changes in my recommended allocations to specific funds to reflect changing prospects for specific stock and bond categories which we feel offer the best prospects going forward.

For Moderate Risk Investors

Asset Current (Last Qtr.)
Stocks 67.5% (67.5%)
Bonds 27.5 (27.5)
Cash 5 (5)

For Aggressive Risk Investors

Asset Current (Last Qtr.)
Stocks 85% (85%)
Bonds 10 (10)
Cash 5 (5)

For Conservative Investors

Asset Current (Last Qtr.)
Stocks 47.5% (47.5%)
Bonds 45 (45)
Cash 7.5 (7.5)

Model Stock Fund Portfolio
The most significant change from our 4th quarter Model Portfolios is a somewhat lesser emphasis on funds/ETFs with either a Growth or a Small/Mid-Cap orientation, and, an increase in our International allocation. While there is no fundamental reason to expect the two former categories to do less well than before, we simply think the remaining categories in the portfolio are currently showing better prospects, especially our International choices, than the two with lowered allocations.

Our Specific Stock
Fund Recommendations

Fund Category

Recommended Weighting
Now (vs Last Qtr.)
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock (FLPSX)
12.5% (15%)
Tweedy Brown Global Value (TBGVX) (see Note 1)
Vanguard Internat. Growth (VWIGX) (see Note 2)
Putman Europe Equity Y (PEUYX) (see Note 3)
27.5 (22.5)
Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX) or ETF (VOO)
Yacktman (YACKX)
Large Blend
17.5 (17.5)
Vanguard Growth Index (VIGRX) or ETF (VUG)
Fidelity Contra (FCNTX)
Large Growth 12.5 (15%)
Vanguard Windsor II (VWNFX)
Large Value
15 (15)
Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) (A)
Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ) or Fund (VGSIX) (M)
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) (A)
15 (15)
Notes: 1. TBGVX is currently one of our favorite managed funds (see this article from my website for details)
2. VWIGX provides a moderate allocation to Emerging markets and to Asia, areas we expect to do well in 2013.
3. The European region is highly undervalued; PEUYX has done better than Vanguard Europe and has been more tax-efficient.

Model Bond Fund Portfolio
We continue to expect subdued returns for “traditional” bond funds and therefore recommend continuing to invest in funds that have a better chance of doing well than funds which customarily invest in treasuries, mortgage, or short-term bonds.

Our Specific Bond
Fund Recommendations

Fund Category

Recommended Weighting Now
Now (vs Last Qtr.)
PIMCO Total Return Instit (PTTRX) or Harbor Bond Fund (HABDX)






Vang. Total Bond Mkt. (VBMFX) (C) (see Note 1)
35% (35%)
PIMCO Real Return Instit (PRRIX) or Harbor Real Return (HARRX)
12.5 (15)
Vang. Intermed. Term Tax-Ex. (VWITX) (see Note 2) Intermed. Term Muni 15 (12.5)
Vang. Long-Term Inv. Gr. (VWESX)
Loomis Sayles Retail (LSBRX) (A)
Long-Term Corporate and/or Multisector
15 (12.5)
T. Rowe Price High-Yield (PRHYX)
High Yield
15 (15)
PIMCO Foreign Bond (Hedged) Adm (PFRAX)
T Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond (PREMX) (A)
7.5 (5)
Notes: 1. (C) indicates Conservative Risk; (A) indicates Aggressive Risk; we believe it will likely hardly pay to be conservative in  this extremely low rate environment. Therefore, we are also eliminating our prior 5% recommendation for Vanguard GNMA Fund in the Intermediate Govt. bond category.
Note 2: Instead, if available, select a muni fund that has your own state’s bonds for double-tax exemption.

About Mutual Fund Research Newsletter

Mutual Fund Research Newsletter is a free newsletter which began publication in 1999. It has become one of the most popular mutual fund newsletters on the Internet, as shown on the Alexa.com “Top Sites” page for Mutual Funds News and Media Newsletter websites. Tom Madell, the Publisher, is a researcher and writer, as well as a long-term investor, whose investing articles have appeared on hundreds of websites, including the Wall Street Journal and USA Today, Morningstar, and in the international media.

Since we began publishing our Newsletter’s quarterly Model Portfolios, the great majority of our Stock Portfolios have outperformed the S&P 500 Index over the following year, 3 years, and 5 years. Ours is one of the most consistent track records anywhere.

The site is unique in that it takes an empirical, technical analysis approach to forecasting which specific mutual funds will likely outperform the major stock indices, along with an economic, fundamental analysis.

You can become a free subscriber to the site, receiving occasional email notification as soon as new articles or investing alerts become available, by emailing funds-newsletter@att.net using “free subscription” as the subject. You can also reach me using the same address.


©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.