Natalie Choate addresses investors' dilemmas in light of today's tax code uncertainty.
2012 is drawing to a close, and no one knows what tax rates and rules will prevail in 2013. Is there anything clients can do, now, with their retirement benefits that might help minimize taxes?
Question: Steve is over age 70½ and owns an IRA. For the last several years, he has used his required minimum distribution (his will be about $40,000 this year) to fund a charitable gift via direct transfer from the IRA to our city's Community Foundation. However, these so-called "qualified charitable distributions" (QCDs) are no longer part of the Tax Code, since the applicable section (allowing direct IRA-to-charity transfers of up to $100,000 for individuals over age 70½) expired at the end of 2011.
Steve is waiting to see whether Congress will renew QCDs again for 2012, but he is getting nervous about missing his required 2012 distribution. He doesn't want to owe the IRS a 50% penalty (for failing to take the minimum required distribution--that would happen if he waits too long to take his 2012 distribution), but he also does not want to waste a tax-planning opportunity by taking his required distribution in cash, and then finding out if he had waited just a little longer, he could have satisfied the RMD with a QCD if Congress decides to renew that provision at the last minute--as they did in 2010, for example. What should he do?
Answer: I would recommend that Steve instruct his IRA provider, right now, to send the $40,000 2012 minimum distribution amount directly from the IRA to the Community Foundation. By doing so he will have satisfied his 2012 required minimum distribution, so he can stop worrying about incurring a penalty.
If Congress does finally renew the QCD option for 2012 very late in the year, they will almost certainly make it retroactive to the beginning of the year, as they did when they originally created QCDs in 2006, and again when they renewed them in 2008 and 2010. Assuming Congress does renew the QCD option and make it retroactive, Steve will be in good shape because he has already done his QCD for the year.
If Congress does not extend QCDs for 2012, then Steve is no worse off than if he had withdrawn the funds and then contributed them to the Community Foundation: He will have a taxable distribution of $40,000 plus a charitable contribution of the same amount that should be at least partly deductible, subject to the usual rules and limitations regarding charitable contributions.
Question: Vinny is very concerned that tax rates are going to increase substantially after 2012. He is retired, with a large IRA, and has over $250,000 a year of investment income in addition to taxable minimum required distributions that he doesn't need for his living expenses, but that, of course, he receives anyway from his substantial IRA. He is looking for a way to keep his income under $250,000 a year for future years in view of the potentially higher tax brackets that may well apply to income over that amount. But just when he thinks he should "pull the trigger" and do something to accelerate distribution of his IRA into the 2012 year (when at least he knows what the taxes will be), he gets cold feet thinking about the fact that Congress might roll back all the expected tax increases and let today's rates continue for another year or even longer. What can he do to get out of this dilemma?
Answer: This sounds like an ideal situation for a Roth conversion of Vinny's entire IRA in 2012: