Why some funds with lousy five-year records still have Gold ratings for now.
If you only look at recent past performance, some of Morningstar's Analyst Ratings don't add up. There are a handful of Gold-rated funds whose trailing five-year returns rank in the bottom fourth of their respective categories.
That's because our Analyst Ratings are based on more than performance. A fund's performance is only one of the five pillars of the Analyst Rating. In many cases, the other rating pillars--People, Process, Parent, and Price--can be more indicative of a fund's long-term prospects than past performance. They can, for example, help investors determine whether a fund is as bad or good as its past record suggests. A fund's Analyst Rating could change at any time, but here's a look at why some funds in the midst of five-year slumps still had Gold ratings as of mid-July 2012.
Been There, Done That
Longleaf
Partners LLPFX, which
trailed 88% of its large-blend peers and the S&P 500 by more than 3
percentage points with a 3.8% loss for the five-year period ending July 13,
2012, has been here before and likely will be here again. Several times in its
25-year history it has lagged its peers and the broader stock market due to
deeply contrarian positions. Two of the culprits this time are Chesapeake
Energy CHK and
long-suffering Dell
DELL. Longleaf, however,
remains an intensely independent firm whose veteran managers have a long history
of success with a consistent, albeit sometimes hard to watch, brand of value
investing. From April 8, 1987, to July 13, 2012, the fund gained nearly 1,200%
cumulatively, versus 500% for the average large-blend fund and about 730% for
S&P 500 Index. The fund's high marks for its people, parent, uncompromising
process, and still-strong long-term returns outweigh the recent struggles.
It's Academic
A simple, well-executed idea explains our
high regard for DFA US
Small Cap Value DFSVX
despite its current ranking behind 78% of its small-value peers for the
five-year period through July 13. The fund bases its passive approach on
academic research that shows small-cap and value stocks tend to outperform over
time. It tracks a section of the market--any stock smaller than the market's
1,000th largest with low book value/price ratios--rather than an index. That
gives the fund the flexibility to trade when it is most advantageous rather than
during benchmark rebalancings, which can distort share prices. It also infuses
the fund with a purer shot of small-value stocks, including micro-caps, than
most peers, while making it more volatile than most, too. Bearish markets, such
as in 2007, 2008, and 2011, can weigh on this fund's results temporarily, but
over time its low costs and laserlike focus will help it deliver what it
promises.
Regrets, They've Had a Few
Things have not gone in Davis
Selected Advisors' favor in recent years. The firm's three most prominent
funds--the broker-sold Davis New
York Venture NYVTX,
no-load Selected
American SLADX, and
focused Clipper
CFIMX--got caught with big
helpings of AIG AIG and Merrill Lynch during the
financial crisis and then turned in mixed results after a smart 2009 rebound due
in part to disappointing picks, such as Hewlett
Packard HPQ and
Sino-Forest. This is the longest performance drought in managers Chris Davis and
Ken Feinberg's roughly 15 years together at New York Venture and Selected
American, which also have had to contend with significant outflows in recent
years. The funds face challenges, but Davis and Feinberg have longer tenures
than more than 95% of large-blend fund managers, charge low fees, invest
millions alongside their shareholders, and adhere to the same bottom-up,
low-turnover approach that has delivered index- and peer-beating results over
their careers.
Proved its Mettle
Vanguard
Precious Metals and Mining VGPMX hasn't been itself recently either. Though
volatile in absolute terms, the fund has been known for being less variable and
more broadly diversified across commodities as well as individual stocks than
the typical equity precious-metals fund. The fund has been hit in recent years
with a double-whammy of gold mining shares lagging the price of gold and
generally lower commodity prices since 2007. Nevertheless, manager Graham French
has been at this longer than more than 80% of his peers and has the lowest
expense hurdle to clear. He also was named one of Morningstar Europe's 2011 fund managers of the year for his work on another overseas
fund. It's still the best of a volatile lot in the equity precious metals
category.
Quantifiable Improvement
Bogle
Small Cap Growth Institutional BOGIX suffered like a lot of quantitative strategies in
2007 and 2008. But veteran manager John Bogle Jr. avoided the temptation to
completely overhaul his computer models, opting instead for tweaks that pay
closer attention to short-term volatility signals and could tip the fund off to
trading opportunities. Essentially, the fund still relies on the same valuation
and earnings momentum models responsible for its strong long-term record. Though
the fund's five-year returns still trailed more than 80% of its peers on July
13, performance has improved since 2008.
Finding Equilibrium
Big helpings of financials and
corporate bonds during the financial crisis ravaged what had been up to then Dodge
& Cox Balanced's DODBX
remarkably consistent record. A nearly 75% equity stake and a short-duration,
mostly corporate bond portfolio has made for somewhat erratic returns since.
However, the fund still has one of the deepest and most experienced crews of
value-oriented stock and bond managers in the business and a low expense ratio.
Its huge equity stake, which the managers contend is justified given the low
bond yields and reasonably priced stocks they're seeing, will make the fund more
volatile than it's been in the past. However, it's still capable of delivering
superior returns over the long term.