• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Alternative Investments>Alternatives Investing>New Alternative Analyst Ratings

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. Grantham Keynote: Investing in a Slower-Growth World

    The GMO chief strategist highlights the factors behind the market's bullish bias, abnormally high corporate earnings, current valuation levels, a slowdown in productivity, and the great paradigm shift in natural resources.

  2. Bond Investing in a Teeter-Totter Economy

    Following a first quarter that saw riskier assets outperform, and a second quarter marked by a flight to Treasuries, investors would do well to review the suitability of their current portfolio allocations, says Morningstar's director of fixed-income research.

  3. Tackling the Retirement-Income Challenge

    Premium Member Video: Financial experts John Ameriks, Sue Stevens, and Bill Bernstein address how to allocate fixed-income assets, the importance of total return, the role of annuities, retirement distribution rates, and more in this special panel discussion hosted by Christine Benz.

  4. Investors Haven't Left Equities for Dead

    Equity funds have experienced outflows over the last five years, but the exodus is not as extreme as it's portrayed.

New Alternative Analyst Ratings

What investors can glean from the 40 new alternative Morningstar Analyst Ratings.

Josh Charney, 06/26/2012

Last week, Morningstar launched 40 qualitative ratings on alternative mutual funds. While the jury is still out on a number of key issues surrounding the use of alternative mutual funds--for instance, the allocation question--the launch shines more light on this once relatively obscure space. Investors somewhat acclimated with alternatives will find the ratings quite handy in pinpointing best-of-breed funds. Because Morningstar's alternative categories are extremely granular, these new forward-looking ratings can add substantial value for investors.

Determining Coverage
When selecting the coverage list, Morningstar primarily focused on assets and relative interest. For instance, although The Collar COLLX (Bronze) has only $36 million in assets, it’s the only long-short fund available that collars all its holdings (by buying puts and shorting calls) and selects stocks based solely on option skews. Morningstar also didn't go out of its way to cover bad funds. Of the 40 funds now rated, six were assigned a Negative, 17 were assigned a Neutral, and 17 are Positive medalists (Gold, Silver, or Bronze).

Somewhat Relative
Just as our trademark Morningstar Rating for funds, or “star ratings,” are calculated using risk-adjusted performance rankings relative to the category, the analyst ratings are also determined relative to a fund's peer group. However, comparing alternative funds within the same category isn't as cut and dried as, for example, analyzing funds within the large-cap growth category. Long-short equity is arguably the most homogeneous alternative category, but its constituents are by no means similar (the fund's betas range from 1.7 to negative 0.4). Thus, for some of the more unique funds, Morningstar must first determine if an investor would benefit from the fund's unique strategy and then evaluate how its risk-adjusted performance has stood up to the category. Marketfield MFLDX (Bronze), for instance, employs its macro research to determine overall exposure. Its process, though unique, has proved to protect investors in dark times, and it has handsomely beaten its category since inception.

There are also distinct strategy subsets within certain categories that aid in the comparison process. In the multialternative category, for instance, there are three hedge fund replicators--Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker GARTX (Negative), Natixis ASG Global Alternatives GAFAX (Neutral), and IQ Alpha Hedge Strategy IQHIX (Bronze). Because hedge replication represents a niche subset within the multialternative category, the three were analyzed within the context of each other. IQ Alpha Hedge Strategy is Morningstar's only positive hedge fund replicator because of what we believe is a superior process of overweighting winning hedge fund strategies. Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker received a Negative because the other two were leaps and bounds ahead in terms of their replication techniques. But it wasn't necessary to give one of the replicators a medal. In terms of the ratings distribution, Morningstar doesn't have a preset number of Negatives or medalists.

Why Only One Gold
TFS Market Neutral TFSMX was the sole Gold-rated fund in the entire alternative fund lunch. This is not to say there aren't plenty of great options--a Bronze, Silver, or Gold all represent a recommended fund. It also doesn't suggest that TFS Market Neutral is the best alternative fund, only that it is the best option within the market-neutral category. The evidence supporting TFS Market Neutral was overwhelmingly strong: Management is a proven steward, it has actively closed the fund when the strategy reached capacity, and the fund exhibits a superb track record (the fund is rated 5 stars).

Rating a fund Gold implies all its stars are aligned, while a Bronze or a Silver, though still positive, mean there are some areas that could use improvement. Key areas of concern for alternative offerings, for instance, lie with the fund's Price and People. It is no secret that alternative funds are generally more expensive than traditional funds (because they are smaller and have more-complicated strategies). Absolute Strategies ASFAX (Silver), for instance, lost points for its above-average fees. When evaluating alternative managers, it's very important to see short-selling experience, but this skill may sometimes be lacking. Diamond Hill Long-Short DIAMX (Neutral) applies its long process to its shorts, which can be a recipe for trouble. Indeed, its short positions have hurt the portfolio several times in its history.

Is Market-Neutral the Best?
The big winner from last week's rating launch, by far, was the market-neutral category. Of the eight market-neutral funds rated, one received Gold, three earned Silvers, and two scored Bronzes. So, is market-neutral the best alternative category? Not necessarily. There are 34 funds in the market-neutral category, and of the eight included in last week's launch, six were pretty good. The other reason six funds were recommended is partially because of the poor performance of the category, which has exhibited negative performance on the whole for the past four years. The funds awarded Silver and above all had either 4 or 5 stars. This metric is slightly diminished once the category's weak performance is accounted for because the star rating is based solely on comparing a fund with its category.

Relative strength aside, the market-neutral category truly exhibits many well-designed and -managed funds. Arbitrage ARBFX (Silver) and Merger MERFX (Silver) were both awarded a positive, in part, for their strong People and Process scores. Both are leaders in the merger arbitrage space. The category also has some of the oldest and experienced funds in the alternatives space. Calamos Market Neutral Income’s CVSIX (Bronze) inception was in 1990, and the same lead managers have been with the fund since. Another long-standing fund, JPMorgan Research Market Neutral JPMNX (Bronze), had its inception in late 1998. It employs a strong knowledge base of 23 senior analysts. Overall, there are many worthy players in this category.

Josh Charney is an alternative investments analyst at Morningstar.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.