Many readers want to know how much effective leverage is in their closed-end fund. Although such information is on our site, these do-it-yourselfers want to go to the source. We show them how.
A recent article I wrote about PIMCO Strategic Global Government RCS engendered quite a discussion about leverage transparency among readers. Many readers agreed with me that the fund should be more transparent about its use of non-1940 Act leverage. This is the type of leverage that arises from modern-day financial flexibility within the portfolio, as compared to when a fund issues debt, draws on a line of credit, or has outstanding preferred shares. My point was not that the fund was overleveraged (that's a matter for individual investors to decide, in my opinion) or that anything untoward was going on, but rather that PIMCO should be more transparent about the fund's use of non-1940 Act leverage.
Other readers, longtime discussion-board contributor capecod in particular, disagreed. In their view, the leverage is disclosed in the annual and semiannual reports and, to paraphrase, investors who don't understand where to find that information should probably not invest in the fund in the first place.
I do believe that we all should understand what we invest our money in. It’s the 10-minute rule: If you can't figure out how any fund is operating and generating total returns and distributions within 10 minutes, move on to another fund. If too many red flags pop up or you feel like your digging is leading to more questions than answers, likewise, move on to another fund.
However, this process can be tricky. After all, more often than not, we don't know what we don't know. And developing an investment paradigm for closed-end funds, or CEFs, takes time and effort. I don't believe that investing should require a background in advanced finance or accounting--though I have both. Our job as analysts at Morningstar is to dig through the information and present it to you in a distilled form. For example, on Morningstar.com, you can find the total leverage ratio, the 1940 Act leverage ratio, and the non-1940 Act leverage ratio for every CEF traded in the United States. We believe that this information, along with other data points offered free-of-charge on our website, gives you the information you need to make informed investment decisions.
Still, given the heated discussion that cropped up after my article on RCS, I think a deeper delve is in order. Some readers wanted to know how to find this information in the annual report and, in our recent CEF Survey, many participants also asked for more hands-on type instruction. For this exercise, we'll stick with RCS, which as I noted has had terrific risk-adjusted performance, and we'll look at how to find the fund's leverage in its most recently published annual report, dated Jan. 31, 2011 and available on the fund family's website.
Leverage is disclosed in two places in an annual report. It's in both the schedule of investments and in the balance sheet. If you click on the link above, then go to the "Documents" tab, and then click on the Annual Report, you can see this for yourself. Though the data are over a year old, they still suit our purpose.
On Page 9 of the annual report, the schedule of investments begins. This schedule is a list of all of the fund's holdings as of Jan. 31, 2011. It's a snapshot in time, just as the balance sheet will be. Scrolling through the list, you see what the portfolio was invested in on that date. That's interesting in and of itself. But to find the leverage, you need to go to the end of the schedule on Page 26. There you will see that the value of the portfolio's total investments was $1,188,636,118. Liabilities (here a synonym for leverage) were $793,941,305, leaving net assets of $394,694,813. In other words, on Jan. 31, 2011, the fund had roughly $2.01 in liabilities for every $1.00 in net assets in the portfolio. That doesn't include the effective leverage from the options or convertible securities positions.
The balance sheet will tell a similar, though slightly different story. That's because the schedule of investments total of $1,188,636,118 is simply one of the assets listed on the balance sheet. This is true of every fund, as CEFs typically have assets outside of the portfolio. However, the portfolio value is always the largest asset on the balance sheet. Page 28 of the annual report shows the fund's balance sheet. Total assets were $1,405,610,128. You can see that, in addition to the portfolio value, the fund had cash on hand, a few receivables, and other assets.