Investors in IRAs often need a reality check when it comes to these common misconceptions.
The reviews are in for the new edition of Natalie Choate's best-selling book Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits (7th ed. 2011): "Your book has been a tremendously valuable resource to our firm." "I have found this book extremely helpful." "We have read and used it in many cases already." "I love the 7th edition!" "It's paid for itself already by answering several questions." "I ordered these for our company last week, and everyone loves it!" "GREAT BOOK!" To find out why your colleagues (and competitors) are raving about the new edition of Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits, visit www.ataxplan.com.
It's time to drive a stake through the heart of some widely held but very mistaken beliefs about planning for retirement benefits.
The Myth: By leaving your IRA to a perpetual or "dynasty" trust that also qualifies as a "see-through trust" under the Internal Revenue Service's minimum distribution trust rules, you can obtain a perpetual stretch-out for your IRA, or (even better) a perpetual tax-free family investment pool with a Roth IRA.
The Reality: It's true that certain states now permit clients to establish perpetual or 1,000-year trusts. But leaving your IRA or Roth IRA to such a trust in no way lengthens the maximum payout period permitted under the Tax Code's minimum distribution rules--even if the trust does manage to qualify as a "see-through trust" under the IRS' "minimum distribution trust rules." The minimum distribution rules require that all benefits be distributed, beginning the year after the participant's death, in annual installments over the life expectancy of the designated beneficiary. The longest payout period possible under that rule is about 81 years (the life expectancy of a one-year-old beneficiary). So if the perpetual trust qualifies as a see-through, and the oldest beneficiary of the trust is a newborn baby, the payout period for the benefits will be about 81 years. The trust can last forever, but the IRA (or Roth IRA) payable to that trust cannot last beyond the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary.
The Myth: We can get a perpetual stretch-out of our IRA death benefits by leaving them to an individual (say the participant's child), who at his later death leaves the account to a next-generation beneficiary (say the participant's grandchild), who at his later death leaves the account to the next younger generation (the participant's great-grandchild), and so on.
The Reality: Well, it's true that the original beneficiary can name a successor beneficiary for the account, and thus pass it on to, say, the original beneficiary's own child. And it's even true that each successor beneficiary can leave what's left of the account on such beneficiary's death to still another successor beneficiary. But no matter how many successor beneficiaries there are, the account will still have to be distributed over the life expectancy of the FIRST beneficiary--he is the original "designated beneficiary," and his life expectancy is the payout period for the inherited IRA regardless of whether he survives for that entire life expectancy or dies prematurely and passes the account on to a successor beneficiary. So you can see it is unlikely that the account will even exist past the life expectancy of the first beneficiary (because he will probably survive to his life expectancy and therefore he will withdraw 100% of the account). It is extremely unlikely that the account will exist for multiple generations--that would require that each successive generation of beneficiaries dies within the life expectancy of the original beneficiary.
The Myth: The client can leave his retirement accounts to a "conduit see-through" trust for the benefit of his surviving spouse. During the surviving spouse's overlife, the applicable distribution period will be the surviving spouse's life expectancy. When the spouse ultimately later dies, the remaining benefits can be paid to the children over the life expectancy of the oldest child.
The Reality: No they can't. When retirement benefits are paid to a trust, if the trust qualifies as a see-through trust, the applicable distribution period is the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary (the surviving spouse in this example). Even if the trust is the special type of see-through trust known as a "conduit" trust, there is no way for the trust to "flip" over to using the children's life expectancies as the applicable distribution period for benefits remaining in the plan at the surviving spouse's later death. By the way, it's very unlikely there will even be anything left in the retirement plan at that point--that would happen only if the spouse did not survive for her entire life expectancy.